7 research outputs found
Identification of Novel Adenosine A<sub>2A</sub> Receptor Antagonists by Virtual Screening
Virtual screening was performed against experimentally
enabled
homology models of the adenosine A<sub>2A</sub> receptor, identifying
a diverse range of ligand efficient antagonists (hit rate 9%). By
use of ligand docking and Biophysical Mapping (BPM), hits <b>1</b> and <b>5</b> were optimized to potent and selective lead molecules
(<b>11</b>–<b>13</b> from <b>5</b>, p<i>K</i><sub>I</sub> = 7.5–8.5, 13- to >100-fold selective
versus adenosine A<sub>1</sub>; <b>14</b>–<b>16</b> from <b>1</b>, p<i>K</i><sub>I</sub> = 7.9–9.0,
19- to 59-fold selective)
Controlling the Dissociation of Ligands from the Adenosine A<sub>2A</sub> Receptor through Modulation of Salt Bridge Strength
The
association and dissociation kinetics of ligands binding to
proteins vary considerably, but the mechanisms behind this variability
are poorly understood, limiting their utilization for drug discovery.
This is particularly so for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) where
high resolution structural information is only beginning to emerge.
Engineering the human A<sub>2A</sub> adenosine receptor has allowed
structures to be solved in complex with the reference compound ZM241385
and four related ligands at high resolution. Differences between the
structures are limited, with the most pronounced being the interaction
of each ligand with a salt bridge on the extracellular side of the
receptor. Mutagenesis experiments confirm the role of this salt bridge
in controlling the dissociation kinetics of the ligands from the receptor,
while molecular dynamics simulations demonstrate the ability of ligands
to modulate salt bridge stability. These results shed light on a structural
determinant of ligand dissociation kinetics and identify a means by
which this property may be optimized
Biophysical Fragment Screening of the β<sub>1</sub>‑Adrenergic Receptor: Identification of High Affinity Arylpiperazine Leads Using Structure-Based Drug Design
Biophysical fragment screening of
a thermostabilized β<sub>1</sub>-adrenergic receptor (β<sub>1</sub>AR) using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) enabled the identification
of moderate affinity, high ligand efficiency (LE) arylpiperazine hits <b>7</b> and <b>8</b>. Subsequent hit to lead follow-up confirmed
the activity of the chemotype, and a structure-based design approach
using protein–ligand crystal structures of the β<sub>1</sub>AR resulted in the identification of several fragments that
bound with higher affinity, including indole <b>19</b> and quinoline <b>20</b>. In the first example of GPCR crystallography with ligands
derived from fragment screening, structures of the stabilized β<sub>1</sub>AR complexed with <b>19</b> and <b>20</b> were
determined at resolutions of 2.8 and 2.7 Å, respectively
Structure-Based Optimization Strategies for G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) Allosteric Modulators: A Case Study from Analyses of New Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 (mGlu<sub>5</sub>) X‑ray Structures
Two
interesting new X-ray structures of negative allosteric modulator
(NAM) ligands for the mGlu<sub>5</sub> receptor, M-MPEP (<b>3</b>) and fenobam (<b>4</b>), are reported. The new structures
show how the binding of the ligands induces different receptor water
channel conformations to previously published structures. The structure
of fenobam, where a urea replaces the acetylenic linker in M-MPEP
and mavoglurant, reveals a binding mode where the ligand is rotated
by 180° compared to a previously proposed docking model. The
need for multiple ligand structures for accurate GPCR structure-based
drug design is demonstrated by the different growing vectors identified
for the head groups of M-MPEP and mavoglurant and by the unexpected
water-mediated receptor interactions of a new chemotype represented
by fenobam. The implications of the new structures for ligand design
are discussed, with extensive analysis of the energetics of the water
networks of both pseudoapo and bound structures providing a new design
strategy for allosteric modulators
Structure-Based Optimization Strategies for G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) Allosteric Modulators: A Case Study from Analyses of New Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 (mGlu<sub>5</sub>) X‑ray Structures
Two
interesting new X-ray structures of negative allosteric modulator
(NAM) ligands for the mGlu<sub>5</sub> receptor, M-MPEP (<b>3</b>) and fenobam (<b>4</b>), are reported. The new structures
show how the binding of the ligands induces different receptor water
channel conformations to previously published structures. The structure
of fenobam, where a urea replaces the acetylenic linker in M-MPEP
and mavoglurant, reveals a binding mode where the ligand is rotated
by 180° compared to a previously proposed docking model. The
need for multiple ligand structures for accurate GPCR structure-based
drug design is demonstrated by the different growing vectors identified
for the head groups of M-MPEP and mavoglurant and by the unexpected
water-mediated receptor interactions of a new chemotype represented
by fenobam. The implications of the new structures for ligand design
are discussed, with extensive analysis of the energetics of the water
networks of both pseudoapo and bound structures providing a new design
strategy for allosteric modulators
Fragment and Structure-Based Drug Discovery for a Class C GPCR: Discovery of the mGlu<sub>5</sub> Negative Allosteric Modulator HTL14242 (3-Chloro-5-[6-(5-fluoropyridin-2-yl)pyrimidin-4-yl]benzonitrile)
Fragment
screening of a thermostabilized mGlu<sub>5</sub> receptor
using a high-concentration radioligand binding assay enabled the identification
of moderate affinity, high ligand efficiency (LE) pyrimidine hit <b>5</b>. Subsequent optimization using structure-based drug discovery
methods led to the selection of <b>25</b>, HTL14242, as an advanced
lead compound for further development. Structures of the stabilized
mGlu<sub>5</sub> receptor complexed with <b>25</b> and another
molecule in the series, <b>14</b>, were determined at resolutions
of 2.6 and 3.1 Å, respectively
Fragment and Structure-Based Drug Discovery for a Class C GPCR: Discovery of the mGlu<sub>5</sub> Negative Allosteric Modulator HTL14242 (3-Chloro-5-[6-(5-fluoropyridin-2-yl)pyrimidin-4-yl]benzonitrile)
Fragment
screening of a thermostabilized mGlu<sub>5</sub> receptor
using a high-concentration radioligand binding assay enabled the identification
of moderate affinity, high ligand efficiency (LE) pyrimidine hit <b>5</b>. Subsequent optimization using structure-based drug discovery
methods led to the selection of <b>25</b>, HTL14242, as an advanced
lead compound for further development. Structures of the stabilized
mGlu<sub>5</sub> receptor complexed with <b>25</b> and another
molecule in the series, <b>14</b>, were determined at resolutions
of 2.6 and 3.1 Å, respectively