Three Sides of K orean Genetically Modified Food Controversies : Global Standards, Right-to-know and Counter-experts

??????????????? ???????????????????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ?????????????????? ??? ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ???????????????. ????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ??????????????? ???????????? ???????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ??????????????? ?????? ???????????? ????????????. ??? ????????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ??? ??????-?????? ?????????, ????????????, ?????? ?????????-??? ????????? ?????? ?????? ????????????????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ???????????????. ?????? ??????????????? '???????????? ????????? ??????'??? ???????????? ?????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ???????????????. ??? ????????? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ?????????, ????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ??? ????????? ????????? ????????????. The main issue in Korean debates over genetically modified (GM) foods have been government's responsibility to guarantee consumers' right-to-know and make informed choice. Counter-experts' critique over the current regulatory processes based upon substantial equivalence have not been widely publicized. Through interviews and textual analysis, this paper explored three groups' performances in Korean GM food controversies-regulatory scientists, civil society organizations, and counter-experts. Analytic focus was made upon how each of the groups interact with current GM food regulations. While making conflicts with regulatory scientists and their 'discourse of compliance with global standards,' counter-experts were excluded from regulatory processes. This article suggests that the processes and contexts in which counter-experts failed to form strong alliance with other groups need to be examined in order to further understand the specific contours of Korean GM food controversies.clos

Statistics of Underlying Factors.

<p>Statistics of Underlying Factors.</p

Fan-Loyalty Histogram with a Bin Size of 0.05 among the Users in Head Group.

<p>Fan-Loyalty Histogram with a Bin Size of 0.05 among the Users in Head Group.</p

User interface of Naver Baseball.

<p>①: Game list, ②: Chat button, ③: Favorite team selection button, ④: Chat input area, ⑤: Filter button to see chat messages on each team.</p

Statistics of the Amount of Chat Interactions.

<p>Statistics of the Amount of Chat Interactions.</p

Markov Chain state space.

<p>Markov Chain state space.</p

The User Distribution According to the Activity (# of Games a User Chatted).

<p>The User Distribution According to the Activity (# of Games a User Chatted).</p