Survey of medical staff performing intubation/extubation with enclosure on mannequins (n = 39).

Survey of medical staff performing intubation/extubation with enclosure on mannequins (n = 39).</p

Fig 3 -

Aerosol particle concentrations as a function of distance from enclosure: Outside particle concentration compared to inside particle number concentration as a function of distance for enclosure (A) without plastic coverings vs. (B) enclosure with dual coverings of furniture wrap and Steri-Drape.</p

Complete survey results of medical professionals that had used the enclosure for simulated intubation/extubation procedures on mannequins at two different hospitals.

(DOCX)</p

Summary of statistical result for cover comparison.

(DOCX)</p

Comparison of fraction of particle escape during enclosure agitation.

(DOCX)</p

Effectiveness of different enclosure covering approaches and materials: Ratio of the maximum aerosol number concentration measured inside vs. measured outside the enclosure for particles larger than 0.1 micrometers when various types of one-layer of plastic covering with or without an added Steri-Drape layer were placed over the front and side holes in the enclosure.

Effectiveness of different enclosure covering approaches and materials: Ratio of the maximum aerosol number concentration measured inside vs. measured outside the enclosure for particles larger than 0.1 micrometers when various types of one-layer of plastic covering with or without an added Steri-Drape layer were placed over the front and side holes in the enclosure.</p

Images of fluorescent particle settling and escape visualization experiment.

(DOCX)</p

Comparison of total particle concentration generated from real and simulated coughs.

(DOCX)</p

Sampling intake locations for enclosure.

(DOCX)</p

Small particle size distribution from nebulizers.

(DOCX)</p