2 research outputs found
Acid–Base Equilibriums of Lumichrome and its 1-Methyl, 3-Methyl, and 1,3-Dimethyl Derivatives
Lumichrome photophysical properties at different pH were
characterized
by UV–vis spectroscopy and steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence
techniques, in four forms of protonation/deprotonation: neutral form,
two monoanions, and dianion. The excited-state lifetimes of these
forms of lumichrome were measured and discussed. The results were
compared to those obtained for similar forms of alloxazine and/or
isoalloxazine, and also to those of 1-methyl- and 3-methyllumichrome
and 1,3-dimethyllumichrome. The absorption, emission, and synchronous
spectra of lumichrome, 1-methyl- and 3-methyllumichrome, and 1,3-dimethyllumichrome
at different pH were measured and used in discussion of fluorescence
of neutral and deprotonated forms of lumichrome. The analysis of steady-state
and time-resolved spectra and the DFT calculations both predict that
the N(1) monoanion and the NÂ(1,3) dianion of lumichrome have predominantly
isoalloxazinic structures. Additionally, we confirmed that neutral
lumichrome exists in its alloxazinic form only, in both the ground
and the excited state. We also confirmed the existence and the alloxazinic
structure of a second N(3) monoanion. The estimated values of p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> = 8.2 are for the equilibrium between neutral
lumichrome and alloxazinic and isoalloxazinic monoanions, with proton
dissociation from N(1)–H and N(3)–H groups proceeding
at the almost the same pH, while the second value p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> = 11.4 refers to the formation of the isoalloxazinic
dianion in the ground state
Variational Calculation of Highly Excited Rovibrational Energy Levels of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>
Results are presented for highly
accurate ab initio variational
calculation of the rotation–vibration energy levels of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in its electronic ground state. These results
use a recently computed potential energy surface and the variational
nuclear–motion programs WARV4, which uses an exact kinetic
energy operator, and TROVE, which uses a numerical expansion for the
kinetic energy. The TROVE calculations are performed for levels with
high values of rotational excitation, <i>J</i> up to 35.
The purely ab initio calculations of the rovibrational energy levels
reproduce the observed levels with a standard deviation of about 1
cm<sup>–1</sup>, similar to that of the <i>J</i> =
0 calculation, because the discrepancy between theory and experiment
for rotational energies within a given vibrational state is substantially
determined by the error in the vibrational band origin. Minor adjustments
are made to the ab initio equilibrium geometry and to the height of
the torsional barrier. Using these and correcting the band origins
using the error in <i>J</i> = 0 states lowers the standard
deviation of the observed–calculated energies to only 0.002
cm<sup>–1</sup> for levels up to <i>J</i> = 10 and
0.02 cm<sup>–1</sup> for all experimentally known energy levels,
which extend up to <i>J</i> = 35