Goodness of Fit Statistics for Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results for Fully Correlated Four and Five Factor Models for the ESI-R for Korean and Polish Samples.

<p>Note.</p><p>***p<.001.</p><p>GFI = Goodness of Fit Index; AGFI = Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index; NFI = Normed Fit Index; RFI = Relative Fit Index; IFI = Incremental Fit Index; TLI = Tucker Lewis Index; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR = Standardized Root Mean Residual. For Koreans, Δdf from 4 to 5 factor = 4; Δχ² from 4 to 5 factor = 342.14, p<.001. For Polish, Δdf from 4 to 5 factor = 4; Δχ² from 4 to 5 factor = 68.97, p<.001. Though not reported, all regression weights for all models significant at p<.05 or lower.</p><p>Goodness of Fit Statistics for Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results for Fully Correlated Four and Five Factor Models for the ESI-R for Korean and Polish Samples.</p

ESI-R Item Descriptive and Reliability Statistics for Combined Sample (N = 4004).

<p><i>Note</i>. CISr = Corrected item-to-scale total correlation. Numbers accompanying ESI-R item content reflects item number on test. (-) = Reverse worded and scored. ESI-R Items reprinted with permission of the test author.</p><p>ESI-R Item Descriptive and Reliability Statistics for Combined Sample (N = 4004).</p

Goodness of Fit Statistics for Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results for Fully Correlated Four and Five Factor Models for the ESI-R for American and Canadian Samples.

<p>Note.</p><p>***p<.001.</p><p>GFI = Goodness of Fit Index; AGFI = Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index; NFI = Normed Fit Index; RFI = Relative Fit Index; IFI = Incremental Fit Index; TLI = Tucker Lewis Index; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR = Standardized Root Mean Residual. For Americans, Δdf from 4 to 5 factor = 4; Δχ² from 4 to 5 factor = 94.24, p<.001. For Canadians, Δdf from 4 to 5 factor = 4; Δχ² from 4 to 5 factor = 545.46, p<.001. Though not reported, all regression weights for all models significant at p<.05 or lower.</p><p>Goodness of Fit Statistics for Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results for Fully Correlated Four and Five Factor Models for the ESI-R for American and Canadian Samples.</p

One-way ANOVA Results for ESI-R Items as a Function of Country.

<p><i>Note</i>. All ANOVAs significant at p<.001. COS = Cognitive Orientation toward Spirituality, EPD = Experiential/Phenomenological Dimension, EWB = Existential Well-Being, PAR = Paranormal Beliefs, REL = Religiousness For country, A = American, C = Canadian, I = Indian, J = Japanese, K = Korean, P = Polish, S = Slovakian, U = Ugandan.</p><p>One-way ANOVA Results for ESI-R Items as a Function of Country.</p

Goodness of Fit Statistics for Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results for Fully Correlated Four and Five Factor Models for the ESI-R for Slovakian and Ugandan Samples.

<p>Note.</p><p>***p<.001.</p><p>GFI = Goodness of Fit Index; AGFI = Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index; NFI = Normed Fit Index; RFI = Relative Fit Index; IFI = Incremental Fit Index; TLI = Tucker Lewis Index; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR = Standardized Root Mean Residual. For Slovakians, Δdf from 4 to 5 factor = 4; Δχ² from 4 to 5 factor = 84.76, p<.001. For Ugandans, Δdf from 4 to 5 factor = 4; Δχ² from 4 to 5 factor = 46.57, p<.001. Though not reported, all regression weights for all models significant at p<.05 or lower.</p><p>Goodness of Fit Statistics for Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results for Fully Correlated Four and Five Factor Models for the ESI-R for Slovakian and Ugandan Samples.</p

Goodness of Fit Statistics for Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results for Fully Correlated Four and Five Factor Models for the ESI-R for Indian and Japanese Samples.

<p>Note.</p><p>***p<.001.</p><p>GFI = Goodness of Fit Index; AGFI = Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index; NFI = Normed Fit Index; RFI = Relative Fit Index; IFI = Incremental Fit Index; TLI = Tucker Lewis Index; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR = Standardized Root Mean Residual. For Indians, Δdf from 4 to 5 factor = 4; Δχ² from 4 to 5 factor = 157.93, p<.001. For Japanese, Δdf from 4 to 5 factor = 4; Δχ² from 4 to 5 factor = 112.98, p<.001. Though not reported, all regression weights for all models significant at p<.05 or lower.</p><p>Goodness of Fit Statistics for Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results for Fully Correlated Four and Five Factor Models for the ESI-R for Indian and Japanese Samples.</p

ESI-R Dimension Descriptive and Reliability Statistics for Combined Sample (N = 4004).

<p><i>Note</i>. Alpha = Cronbach’s Alpha</p><p>ESI-R Dimension Descriptive and Reliability Statistics for Combined Sample (N = 4004).</p

Standardized Regression Weights and Goodness-of-Fit Statistics for Both Four and Five Factor Models of the ESI-R Using the Total Combined Sample (N = 4004).

<p><i>Note</i>. Overall fit statistics for the models were as follows: Four factor model: χ² = 5804.96, df = 399, p<,001; χ²/df = 14.55; Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = .89; Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) = .87; Normed Fit Index (NFI) = .87; Relative Fit Index (RFI) = .86; Incremental Fit Index (IFI) = .88; Tucker Lewis Index (TLI) = .87; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = .88; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = .06, p<.001; Standardized Root Mean Residual (SRMR) = .0528. Five factor model: χ² = 3830.64, df = 395, p<.001; χ²/df = 9.70; GFI = .94; AGFI = .92; NFI = .92; RFI = .91; IFI = .92; TLI = .92; CFI = .92; RMSEA = .05, p>.05; SRMR = .0477. Δdf from 4 to 5 factor model = 4, Δ χ² from 4 to 5 factor = 1974.32, p<.001. All regression weights significant at p<.05 or lower.</p><p>Standardized Regression Weights and Goodness-of-Fit Statistics for Both Four and Five Factor Models of the ESI-R Using the Total Combined Sample (N = 4004).</p

Descriptive Statistics, Reliabilities, SAL Subscale Inter-correlations and Correlations with ESI-R Dimensions Across American, Indian, and Ugandan Samples.

<p><i>Note</i>. Mean CISr = Mean corrected item-to-scale total correlation. For SAL, REL = Religiousness comprised of items 8, 9, 10, 22, 23, 31, 37, and 40; EWB = Existential Well-Being comprised of items 3, 4, 5, 11, 12, 17, 35, and 39; PAR = Paranormal Beliefs comprised of items 13, 16, 24, and 27. ESIR-COS = ESI-R Cognitive Orientation toward Spirituality; ESIR-EPD = ESI-R Experiential/Phenomenological Dimension; ESIR-EWB = ESI-R Existential Well-Being; ESIR-PAR = ESI-R Paranormal Beliefs; ESIR-REL = ESI-R Religiousness. For sex, male coded 0, female coded 1.</p><p>*p<.05</p><p>**p<.01</p><p>***p<.001.</p><p>Descriptive Statistics, Reliabilities, SAL Subscale Inter-correlations and Correlations with ESI-R Dimensions Across American, Indian, and Ugandan Samples.</p

Varimax Rotated Factor Loadings from Principal Axis Factor Analyses of ESI-R Items Using Total Combined Sample and Combined Sample Minus Canadian Sample.

<p><i>Note</i>. COS = Cognitive Orientation toward Spirituality, EPD = Experiential/Phenomenological Dimension, EWB = Existential Well-Being, PAR = Paranormal Beliefs, REL = Religiousness Loadings .30 or higher are in bold font.</p><p>Varimax Rotated Factor Loadings from Principal Axis Factor Analyses of ESI-R Items Using Total Combined Sample and Combined Sample Minus Canadian Sample.</p