13 research outputs found

    The effects of a 6-month Tai Chi Qigong training program on temporomandibular, cervical and shoulder joint mobility and sleep problems in nasopharyngeal cancer survivors

    Get PDF
    Introduction. Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) survivors often sustain head–neck–shoulder impairments from conventional treatments, which could disturb sleep. This novel study aimed to examine the efficacy of Tai Chi (TC) Qigong in optimizing temporomandibular joint (TMJ), cervical, and shoulder joint mobility and reducing sleep problems in NPC survivors. Methods. Fifty-two NPC survivors participated in the study. The experimental group (n = 25) received 6 months of TC Qigong training (1.5 h/session; 4 sessions/wk including self-practice) while the control group (n = 27) received no training. Cervical side flexion and rotation, shoulder flexion and horizontal flexion range of motion (ROM), mouth opening capacity (interincisor distance), and sleep problems (Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale) were assessed at baseline, mid-intervention (3 months), immediately after TC Qigong training, and at 6-month follow-up. Results. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed improvement in cervical side flexion ROM only (P .008) after the TC Qigong training. Deterioration was observed in shoulder flexion ROM and mouth opening capacity in the no-training controls over time (P < .008). Sleep problems also decreased in the TC Qigong group (P < .008), and this effect was most profound during the follow-up period. In addition, improvement in cervical side flexion ROM was associated with a reduction in sleep problems in the experimental group after TC Qigong training (P < .05). Conclusions. The 6-month TC Qigong intervention improved neck mobility, maintained TMJ and shoulder joint mobility, and reduced sleep problems for NPC survivors. TC Qigong could be an effective nonpharmacological intervention for managing progressive trismus, chronic neck and shoulder hypomobility, and reducing sleep problems among NPC survivors.postprin

    Significance of circulating endothelial progenitor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma

    No full text
    This study evaluated the significance of circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a solid tumor with rich neovasculature. Eighty patients with HCC were recruited for the study, and 16 patients with liver cirrhosis and 14 healthy subjects were also included for comparison. Blood samples were taken before treatment. Total mononuclear cells were isolated from peripheral blood, preplated to eliminate mature circulating endothelial cells, and colony-forming units (CFUs) formed by circulating EPCs were counted. To validate the CFU scores, FACS quantification of EPCs using CD133, VEGFR2, and CD34 as markers was performed in 30 cases. Our study showed significantly higher mean CFU scores in patients with HCC compared to patients with cirrhosis and healthy controls (P = .001 and .009, respectively). Furthermore, the CFU scores of patients with HCC positively correlated with levels of serum α-fetoprotein (r = .303, P = .017), plasma VEGF (r = .242, P = .035), and plasma interleukin-8 (IL-8) (r = .258, P = .025). Patients with unresectable HCC had higher CFU scores than patients with resectable tumors (P = .027). Furthermore, for those who underwent curative surgery, higher preoperative CFU scores were observed in patients with recurrence within 1 year compared with those who were disease-free after 1 year (P = .013). In conclusion, higher circulating levels of EPCs are seen in patients with advanced unresectable HCC as compared to patients with resectable HCC or those with liver cirrhosis. Our evidence supports the potential use of circulating level of EPCs as a prognostic marker in patients with HCC. Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.link_to_subscribed_fulltex

    Musculoskeletal strength, balance performance, and self-efficacy in elderly Ving Tsun Chinese martial art practitioners : implications for fall prevention

    No full text
    2014-2015 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalVersion of RecordPublishe

    Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Flourishing Novel Approaches in the Era of Biological Therapy

    No full text
    The progress in the development of systemic treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) has been slow. The main stream treatment remains using chemotherapy including gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX, and nab-paclitaxel. Erlotinib is the only approved biological therapy with marginal benefit. Studies of agents targeting epidermal growth factor receptor, angiogenesis, and RAS signaling have not been satisfying, and the usefulness of targeted therapy in APC is uncertain. Understanding in molecular processes and tumor biology has opened the door for new treatment strategies such as targeting insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, transforming growth factor β, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, and Notch pathway. New directions also include the upcoming immunotherapy and many novel agents that act on the microenvironment. The practice of personalized medicine using predictive biomarkers and pharmacogenomics signatures may also enhance the effectiveness of existing treatment. Future treatment approaches may involve comprehensive genomic assessment of tumor and integrated combinations of multiple agents to overcome treatment resistance. ©AlphaMed Press 2014

    Efficacy and safety of single agent sunitinib in treating Sorafenib Refractory Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: a prospective, open-label, phase II study

    No full text
    Postal oral session: PO-32Conference Theme: A Bridge to a Consensus on HCC ManagementLink_to_subscribed_fulltex

    Next-Generation Sequencing with a 54-Gene Panel Identifies Unique Mutational Profile and Prognostic Markers in Chinese Patients with Myelofibrosis

    No full text
    634. Myeloproliferative Syndromes: Clinical: Poster I: no. 1638Introduction and objectives: Myelofibrosis (MF) has the worst outcome amongst various myeloproliferative neoplasms. Its prognosis is determined by clinicopathologic features and mutations in key driver genes. An increasing number of gene mutations involving various biological pathways in myeloid malignancies has been discovered. The prognostic significance of these mutations have not been clearly defined. In this study, we aim to describe the genomic characteristic in a large cohort of MF patients and identify clinical and molecular predictors of outcome. Methods: We evaluated the genetic profile of 101 patients with MF (primary, N=70; secondary, N=30) using next-generation sequencing with a 54-gene panel comprising: ABL1, ASXL1, ATRX, BCOR, BCORL1, BRAF, CALR, CBL, CBLB, CBLC, CDKN2A, CEBPA, CSF3R, CUX1, DNMT3A, ETV6, EZH2, FBXW7, FLT3, GATA1, GATA2, GNAS, HRAS, IDH1, IDH2, IKZF1, JAK2, JAK3, KDM6A, KIT, KMT2A, KRAS, MPL, MYD88, NOTCH1, NPM1, NRAS, PDGFRA, PHF6, PTEN, PTPN11, RAD21, RUNX1, SETBP1, SF3B1, SMC1A, SMC3, SRSF2, STAG2, TET2, TP53, U2AF1, WT1, ZRSR2. Multivariate cox regression analysis was used to determine prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS). Results: We identified mutations in 39 genes implicated in myeloid malignancies (Figure 1A). 96 patients (95%) with MF had a mutation in 1 or more genes: 14 patients (13.9%) had 1 mutation, 38 patients (37.6%) had 2 mutations, 18 patients (17.8%) had 3 mutations, 15 patients (14.9%) had 4 mutations, 7 patients (6.9%) had 5 mutations and 4 patients (4%) had 6 or more mutations. TET2/JAK2V617F (16 patients, 15.9%), ASXL1/JAK2V617F (12 patients, 11.9%) and ASXL1/CALR (10 patients, 9.9%) were the most frequently co-mutated genes (Figure 1B). Other JAK2 variants occurred concomitantly with JAK2V617F in 10 patients (9.9%) and CALR mutations in 4 patients (4%) mutations. Other frequently concomitant mutations included CUX1/JAK2V617F (6 patients, 5.9%), EZH2/JAK2V617F (6 patients, 5.9%), RUNX1/JAK2V617F (5 patients, 5%), SF3B1/JAK2V617F (5 patients, 5%), SETBP1/JAK2V617F (4 patients, 4%) and ZRSR2/JAK2V617F (4 patients, 4%). The median follow-up of the cohort was 49 (1-256) months. The 5-year and 10-year OS were 66.3% and 35.4%. The 5-year and 10-year LFS of were 84% and 63.3%. There were no statistically significant differences in OS and LFS between primary and secondary MF. Significant negative prognostic indicators were identified on multivariate analysis, including male gender (P=0.044), age > 65 years (P=0.044), Hb < 10g/dL (P=0.001), mutated CUX1 (P=0.003) and mutated TP53 (P=0.043) for OS, and Hb < 10g/dL (P=0.007), mutated TP53 (P=0.043) and mutated IDH2 (P=0.001) for LFS. In primary MF, inferior prognostic indicators included male gender (P=0.031), Hb < 10g/dL (P=0.002), platelet count < 100 x 109/L (P=0.021), mutated TET2 (P=0.011) and mutated CUX1 (P=0.011) for OS; and Hb < 10g/dL (P=0.027), mutated RUNX1 (P=0.019) and mutated DNMT3A (P=0.004) for LFS. In JAK2V617F positive MF, inferior prognostic indicators included mutated ASXL1 (P=0.006) and mutated SRSF2 (P<0.001) for OS; and mutated U2AF1 (P=0.037) for LFS. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated unique molecular profiles and prognostic predictors of outcome in Chinese patients with MF
    corecore