Cauda equina syndrome treated by surgical decompression: the influence of timing on surgical outcome

A prospective longitudinal inception cohort study of 33 patients undergoing surgery for cauda equina syndrome (CES) due to a herniated lumbar disc. To determine what factors influence spine and urinary outcome measures at 3 months and 1 year in CES specifically with regard to the timing of onset of symptoms and the timing of surgical decompression. CES consists of signs and symptoms caused by compression of lumbar and sacral nerve roots. Controversy exists regarding the relative importance of timing of surgery as a prognostic factor influencing outcome. Post-operative outcome was assessed at 3 months and 1 year using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for leg and back pain and an incontinence questionnaire. Statistical analysis was used to determine the association between pre-operative variables and these post-operative outcomes with a specific emphasis on the timing of surgery. Surgery was performed on 12 (36%) patients within 48 h of the onset of symptoms including seven patients (21%) who underwent surgery within 24 h. Follow up was achieved in 27 (82%) and 25 (76%) patients at 3 and 12 months, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome between three groups of patients with respect to length of time from symptom onset to surgery- <24, 24–48 and >48 h. A significantly better outcome was found in patients who were continent of urine at presentation compared with those who were incontinent. The duration of symptoms prior to surgery does not appear to influence the outcome. This finding has significant implications for the medico-legal sequelae of this condition. The data suggests that the severity of bladder dysfunction at the time of surgery is the dominant factor in recovery of bladder function

Cauda equina syndrome: a review of the current clinical and medico-legal position

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare condition with a disproportionately high medico-legal profile. It occurs most frequently following a large central lumbar disc herniation, prolapse or sequestration. Review of the literature indicates that around 50–70% of patients have urinary retention (CES-R) on presentation with 30–50% having an incomplete syndrome (CES-I). The latter group, especially if the history is less than a few days, usually requires emergency MRI to confirm the diagnosis followed by prompt decompression by a suitably experienced surgeon. Every effort should be made to avoid CES-I with its more favourable prognosis becoming CES-R while under medical supervision either before or after admission to hospital. The degree of urgency of early surgery in CES-R is still not in clear focus but it cannot be doubted that earliest decompression removes the mechanical and perhaps chemical factors which are the causes of progressive neurological damage. A full explanation and consent procedure prior to surgery is essential in order to reduce the likelihood of misunderstanding and litigation in the event of a persistent neurological deficit

Lumbar spinal canal MRI diameter is smaller in herniated disc cauda equina syndrome patients

Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical features in cauda equina syndrome (CES) is unknown; nor is known whether there are differences in MRI spinal canal size between lumbar herniated disc patients with CES versus lumbar herniated discs patients without CES, operated for sciatica. The aims of this study are 1) evaluating the association of MRI features with clinical presentation and outcome of CES and 2) comparing lumbar spinal canal diameters of lumbar herniated disc patients with CES versus lumbar herniated disc patients without CES, operated because of sciatica.MRIs of CES patients were assessed for the following features: level of disc lesion, type (uni- or bilateral) and severity of caudal compression. Pre- and postoperative clinical features (micturition dysfunction, defecation dysfunction, altered sensation of the saddle area) were retrieved from the medical files. In addition, anteroposterior (AP) lumbar spinal canal diameters of CES patients were measured at MRI. AP diameters of lumbar herniated disc patients without CES, operated for sciatica, were measured for comparison.48 CES patients were included. At MRI, bilateral compression was seen in 82%; complete caudal compression in 29%. MRI features were not associated with clinical presentation nor outcome. AP diameter was measured for 26 CES patients and for 31 lumbar herniated disc patients without CES, operated for sciatica. Comparison displayed a significant smaller AP diameter of the lumbar spinal canal in CES patients (largest p = 0.002). Compared to average diameters in literature, diameters of CES patients were significantly more often below average than that of the sciatica patients (largest p = 0.021).This is the first study demonstrating differences in lumbar spinal canal size between lumbar herniated disc patients with CES and lumbar herniated disc patients without CES, operated for sciatica. This finding might imply that lumbar herniated disc patients with a relative small lumbar spinal canal might need to be approached differently in managing complaints of herniated disc. Since the number of studied patients is relatively small, further research should be conducted before clinical consequences are considered