8 research outputs found
Impact of H1N1 on Socially Disadvantaged Populations: Systematic Review
The burden of H1N1 among socially disadvantaged populations is unclear. We aimed to synthesize hospitalization, severe illness, and mortality data associated with pandemic A/H1N1/2009 among socially disadvantaged populations.Studies were identified through searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, scanning reference lists, and contacting experts. Studies reporting hospitalization, severe illness, and mortality attributable to laboratory-confirmed 2009 H1N1 pandemic among socially disadvantaged populations (e.g., ethnic minorities, low-income or lower-middle-income economy countries [LIC/LMIC]) were included. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, data abstraction, and quality appraisal (Newcastle Ottawa Scale). Random effects meta-analysis was conducted using SAS and Review Manager.Sixty-two studies including 44,777 patients were included after screening 787 citations and 164 full-text articles. The prevalence of hospitalization for H1N1 ranged from 17-87% in high-income economy countries (HIC) and 11-45% in LIC/LMIC. Of those hospitalized, the prevalence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality was 6-76% and 1-25% in HIC; and 30% and 8-15%, in LIC/LMIC, respectively. There were significantly more hospitalizations among ethnic minorities versus non-ethnic minorities in two studies conducted in North America (1,313 patients, OR 2.26 [95% CI: 1.53-3.32]). There were no differences in ICU admissions (n = 8 studies, 15,352 patients, OR 0.84 [0.69-1.02]) or deaths (n = 6 studies, 14,757 patients, OR 0.85 [95% CI: 0.73-1.01]) among hospitalized patients in HIC. Sub-group analysis indicated that the meta-analysis results were not likely affected by confounding. Overall, the prevalence of hospitalization, severe illness, and mortality due to H1N1 was high for ethnic minorities in HIC and individuals from LIC/LMIC. However, our results suggest that there were little differences in the proportion of hospitalization, severe illness, and mortality between ethnic minorities and non-ethnic minorities living in HIC
Image-Based Reporting for Bronchoscopy
Bronchoscopy is often performed for staging lung cancer. The recent development of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scanners and ultrathin bronchoscopes now enable the bronchoscopic biopsy and treatment of peripheral diagnostic regions of interest (ROIs). Because these ROIs are often located several generations within the airway tree, careful planning and interpretation of the bronchoscopic route is required prior to a procedure. The current practice for planning bronchoscopic procedures, however, is difficult, error prone, and time consuming. To alleviate these issues, we propose a method for producing and previewing reports for bronchoscopic procedures using patient-specific MDCT chest scans. The reports provide quantitative data about the bronchoscopic routes and both static and dynamic previews of the proper airway route. The previews consist of virtual bronchoscopic endoluminal renderings along the route and three-dimensional cues for a final biopsy site. The reports require little storage space and computational resources, enabling physicians to view the reports on a portable tablet PC. To evaluate the efficacy of the reporting system, we have generated reports for 22 patients in a human lung cancer patient pilot study. For 17 of these patients, we used the reports in conjunction with live image-based bronchoscopic guidance to direct physicians to central chest and peripheral ROIs for subsequent diagnostic evaluation. Our experience shows that the tool enabled useful procedure preview and an effective means for planning strategy prior to a live bronchoscopy