Mapping the Anthocyaninless (anl) Locus in Rapid-Cycling Brassica rapa (RBr) to Linkage Group R9

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Anthocyanins are flavonoid pigments that are responsible for purple coloration in the stems and leaves of a variety of plant species. <it>Anthocyaninless </it>(<it>anl</it>) mutants of <it>Brassica rapa </it>fail to produce anthocyanin pigments. In rapid-cycling <it>Brassica rapa</it>, also known as Wisconsin Fast Plants, the anthocyaninless trait, also called non-purple stem, is widely used as a model recessive trait for teaching genetics. Although anthocyanin genes have been mapped in other plants such as <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it>, the <it>anl </it>locus has not been mapped in any <it>Brassica </it>species.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We tested primer pairs known to amplify microsatellites in <it>Brassicas </it>and identified 37 that amplified a product in rapid-cycling <it>Brassica rapa</it>. We then developed three-generation pedigrees to assess linkage between the microsatellite markers and <it>anl</it>. 22 of the markers that we tested were polymorphic in our crosses. Based on 177 F₂offspring, we identified three markers linked to <it>anl </it>with LOD scores ≥ 5.0, forming a linkage group spanning 46.9 cM. Because one of these markers has been assigned to a known <it>B. rapa </it>linkage group, we can now assign the <it>anl </it>locus to <it>B. rapa </it>linkage group R9.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This study is the first to identify the chromosomal location of an anthocyanin pigment gene among the <it>Brassicas</it>. It also connects a classical mutant frequently used in genetics education with molecular markers and a known chromosomal location.</p

Development of Useful Recombinant Promoter and Its Expression Analysis in Different Plant Cells Using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy

BACKGROUND: Designing functionally efficient recombinant promoters having reduced sequence homology and enhanced promoter activity will be an important step toward successful stacking or pyramiding of genes in a plant cell for developing transgenic plants expressing desired traits(s). Also basic knowledge regarding plant cell specific expression of a transgene under control of a promoter is crucial to assess the promoter's efficacy. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have constructed a set of 10 recombinant promoters incorporating different up-stream activation sequences (UAS) of Mirabilis mosaic virus sub-genomic transcript (MS8, -306 to +27) and TATA containing core domains of Figwort mosaic virus sub-genomic transcript promoter (FS3, -271 to +31). Efficacies of recombinant promoters coupled to GUS and GFP reporter genes were tested in tobacco protoplasts. Among these, a 369-bp long hybrid sub-genomic transcript promoter (MSgt-FSgt) showed the highest activity in both transient and transgenic systems. In a transient system, MSgt-FSgt was 10.31, 2.86 and 2.18 times more active compared to the CaMV35S, MS8 and FS3 promoters, respectively. In transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabaccum, var. Samsun NN) and Arabidopsis plants, the MSgt-FSgt hybrid promoter showed 14.22 and 7.16 times stronger activity compared to CaMV35S promoter respectively. The correlation between GUS activity and uidA-mRNA levels in transgenic tobacco plants were identified by qRT-PCR. Both CaMV35S and MSgt-FSgt promoters caused gene silencing but the degree of silencing are less in the case of the MSgt-FSgt promoter compared to CaMV35S. Quantification of GUS activity in individual plant cells driven by the MSgt-FSgt and the CaMV35S promoter were estimated using confocal laser scanning microscopy and compared. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: We propose strong recombinant promoter MSgt-FSgt, developed in this study, could be very useful for high-level constitutive expression of transgenes in a wide variety of plant cells

REGULATION OF PLANT GENE-EXPRESSION BY ANTISENSE RNA

Regulation of gene expression by antisense RNA was first discovered as a naturally-occurring phenomenon in bacteria. Recently natural antisense RNAs have been found in a variety of eukaryotic organisms; their in vivo function is, however, obscure. Deliberate expression of antisense RNA in animal and plant systems has lead to successful down-regulation of specific genes. We will review the current status of antisense gene action in plant systems. The recent discovery that 'sense' genes are able to mimic the action of antisense genes indicates that (anti)sense genes must operate by mechanisms other than RNA-RNA interaction. © 1990