Epidermal Neural Crest Stem Cell (EPI-NCSC)—Mediated Recovery of Sensory Function in a Mouse Model of Spinal Cord Injury

Here we show that epidermal neural crest stem cell (EPI-NCSC) transplants in the contused spinal cord caused a 24% improvement in sensory connectivity and a substantial recovery of touch perception. Furthermore we present a novel method for the ex vivo expansion of EPI-NCSC into millions of stem cells that takes advantage of the migratory ability of neural crest stem cells and is based on a new culture medium and the use of microcarriers. Functional improvement was shown by two independent methods, spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (SpSEP) and the Semmes-Weinstein touch test. Subsets of transplanted cells differentiated into myelinating oligodendrocytes. Unilateral injections of EPI-NCSC into the lesion of midline contused mouse spinal cords elicited bilateral improvements. Intraspinal EPI-NCSC did not migrate laterally in the spinal cord or invade the spinal roots and dorsal root ganglia, thus implicating diffusible factors. EPI-NCSC expressed neurotrophic factors, angiogenic factors, and metalloproteases. The strength of EPI-NCSC thus is that they can exert a combination of pertinent functions in the contused spinal cord, including cell replacement, neuroprotection, angiogenesis and modulation of scar formation. EPI-NCSC are uniquely qualified for cell-based therapy in spinal cord injury, as neural crest cells and neural tube stem cells share a higher order stem cell and are thus ontologically closely related

Desenvolvimento motor de crianças prematuras e a termo: uso da Alberta Infant Motor Scale Desarrollo motor de niños prematuros y a término: uso de la Alberta Infant Motor Scale Motor development of preterm and term infants: using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale

OBJETIVOS: Comparar o desenvolvimento motor de crianças nascidas pré-termo e a termo aos quatro e seis meses de idade, aplicando a Alberta Infant Motor Scale-AIMS na versão brasileira. MÉTODOS: Estudo longitudinal, comparativo, realizado em Fortaleza-Ceará, entre novembro/ 2009 e maio/2010. amostragem por conveniência, foi constituída por 24 crianças pré-termo e 24 a termo. RESULTADOS: Nas crianças de quatro meses, verificou-se diferença estatisticamente significante na posição em pé (p=0,014) e, nas de seis meses, em todas as posições (prono, supina, sentada, em pé) e escores totais. Quanto ao percentil, aos quatro e seis meses, respectivamente, 37,5% das crianças pré-termo mostraram desempenho excelente e 54,2%, normais. CONCLUSÃO: A análise estatística do desempenho motor grosso entre os grupos de crianças estudadas mostrou diferenças no desenvolvimento e evolução dos percentis da AIMS.<br>OBJETIVOS: Comparar el desarrollo motor de niños nacidos pretérmino y a término a los cuatro y seis meses de edad, aplicando la Alberta Infant Motor Scale-AIMS en la versión brasileña. MÉTODOS: Estudio longitudinal, comparativo, realizado en Fortaleza-Ceará, entre noviembre/2009 y mayo/2010. La muestra por conveniencia, estuvo constituída por 24 niños pretérmino y 24 a término. RESULTADOS: En los niños de cuatro meses, se verificó una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en la posición podálica (p=0,014) y, en las de seis meses, en todas las posiciones (prona, supina, sentada, podálica) y scores totales. En cuanto al percentil, a los cuatro y seis meses, respectivamente, el 37,5% de los niños pretérmino mostraron desempeño excelente y el 54,2%, normales. CONCLUSIÓN: El análisis estadístico del desempeño motor grueso entre los grupos de niños estudiados mostró diferencias en el desarrollo y evolución de los percentiles de la AIMS.<br>OBJECTIVES: To compare the motor development of infants born preterm and term at four and six months of age, applying the Alberta Infant Motor Scale AIMS-Brazilian version. METHODS: Longitudinal, comparative study, conducted in Fortaleza, Ceara, between November/2009 and May/2010. A convenience sample was used, consisting of 24 preterm and 24 term infants. RESULTS: In children aged four months, there was a statistically significant difference in the standing position (p = 0.014) and in six months in all positions (prone, supine, sitting, standing) and total scores. In terms of the percentile, at four and six months respectively, 37.5% of preterm infants showed excellent performance and 54.2%, normal performance. CONCLUSION: Statistical analysis of gross motor performance between groups of children studied showed differences in the development and evolution of the percentiles of AIMS

Predictive value of the pendulum test for assessing knee extensor spasticity

Abstract Background The pendulum test is commonly used to quantify knee extensor spasticity, but it is currently unknown to what extent common pendulum test metrics can detect spasticity in patients with neurological injury or disease, and if the presence of flexor spasticity influences the test outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 131 knees, from 93 patients, across four different patient cohorts. Clinical data included Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) scores for knee extensors and flexors, and years since diagnosis. BioTone™ measures included extensor strength, passive and active range of motion, and pendulum tests of most affected or both knees. Pendulum test metrics included the relaxation index (RI), 1st flexion amplitude (F1amp) and plateau angle (Plat), where RI=F1amp/Plat. Two-way ANOVA tests were used to determine if pendulum test metrics were influenced by the degree of knee flexor spasticity graded by the MAS, and ANCOVA was used to test for confounding effects of age, years since injury, strength and range of motion (ROM). In order to identify the best pendulum test metrics, Receiver Operator Characteristic analysis and logistic regression (LR) analysis were used to classify knees by spasticity status (none or any) and severity (low/moderate or high/severe). Results Pendulum test metrics for knee extensors were not influenced by degree of flexor spasticity, age, years since injury, strength or ROM of the limb. RI, F1amp and Plat were > 70% accurate in classifying knees by presence of clinical spasticity (from the MAS), but were less accurate (< 70%) for grading spasticity level. The best classification accuracy was obtained using F1amp and Plat independently in the model rather than using RI alone. Conclusions We conclude that the pendulum test has good predictive value for detecting the presence of extensor spasticity, independent of the existence of flexor spasticity. However, the ability to grade spasticity level as measured by MAS using the RI and/or F1amp may be limited. Further study is warranted to explore if the pendulum test is suitable for quantifying more severe spasticity

Functional hindrance due to spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury during inpatient rehabilitation and 1 year thereafter

Study design: Prospective cohort study. Objective: To assess functional hindrance due to spasticity during inpatient rehabilitation and 1 year thereafter in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to determine factors that influence the hindrance. Setting: Eight specialized rehabilitation centres in the Netherlands. Methods: A total of 203 patients with recent SCI rated the hindrance they perceived due to spasticity in daily living at the start of active rehabilitation (t1), 3 months later (t2), at discharge (t3) and 1 year after discharge (t4). Hindrance was dichotomized into absent or negligible and present. Multilevel regression analyses were performed to determine the course of functional hindrance due to spasticity and its associations with possible determinants-namely, age, gender, cause, lesion level, motor completeness, spasticity and anti-spasticity medication. Results: The percentage of individuals that indicated functional hindrance due to spasticity ranged from 54 to 62% over time and did not change significantly over time (Delta t3t1 odds ratio (OR)=0.85, P=0.44;Delta t3t2 OR=1.20, P=0.41;Delta t3t4 OR=0.91, P=0.67). The percentage of individuals who experienced a lot of hindrance due to spasticity during specific activities ranged from 4 to 27%. The odds for experiencing functional hindrance due to spasticity were significantly higher for individuals with tetraplegia (OR=2.17, P=0.0001), more severe spasticity (OR=5.51, P Conclusion: Functional hindrance due to spasticity occurred in the majority of persons with SCI and did not change significantly during inpatient rehabilitation and 1 year thereafter. Factors that influence hindrance were determined