18 research outputs found

    Participative Leadership and Organizational Identification in SMEs in the MENA Region: Testing the Roles of CSR Perceptions and Pride in Membership

    Get PDF
    The aim of this research is to explore the process linking participative leadership to organizational identification. The study examines the relationship between participative leadership and internal CSR perceptions of employees and also investigates the role that pride in membership plays in the affiliation of CSR perceptions with organizational identification. By studying these relationships, the paper aspires to contemplate new presumed mediators in the association of participative leadership with organizational identification as well as determine a possible novel antecedent of employee CSR perceptions. Empirical evidence is provided from data that was collected through a survey distributed to employees working for small- and medium-sized enterprises in three countries in the Middle East and North Africa regions, particularly the United Arab Emirates, Lebanon, and Tunisia. Findings show that participative leadership leads to positive internal CSR perceptions of employees and that these CSR perceptions lead to pride in membership which, in turn, results in organizational identification. Implications of these findings are also discussed

    Avaliação do tratamento cirúrgico nos pacientes com metástase vertebral secundária ao carcinoma de mama Evaluación del tratamiento quirúrgico en pacientes con metástasis vertebrales secundarias a carcinoma de mama Evaluation of surgical treatment of patients with vertebral metastasis secondary to breast carcinoma

    No full text
    OBJETIVO: Avaliar os resultados cirúrgicos dos pacientes com metástase vertebral secundária ao carcinoma de mama. MÉTODOS: Vinte e duas pacientes operadas com doença metastática vertebral secundária ao carcinoma de mama foram avaliadas no pré-operatório, pós-operatório imediato e depois de 1 mês e 6 meses do procedimento cirúrgico, usando a escala numérica da dor e o índice de incapacidade de Oswestry (ODI). RESULTADOS: As medidas para dor produziram valor de p de 0,0001 para a diferença entre o pré-operatório e o pós-operatório imediato, 0,0005 entre o pós-operatório imediato e 1 mês de pós-operatório, e 0,0908 entre 1 mês de pós-operatório e 6 meses de pós-operatório, portanto, encontram-se evidências de diferenças entre o pré-operatório e o pós-operatório imediato, assim como entre o pós-operatório imediato e após o 1º mês, mas não há tal evidência entre o 1º e o 6º mês de pós-operatório. Quanto ao ODI, a diferença foi significativa em todos os períodos. CONCLUSÃO: A cirurgia melhora a dor e diminui a incapacidade dos pacientes com doença metastática secundária ao carcinoma de mama.<br>OBJETIVO: Evaluar los resultados quirúrgicos de los pacientes con metástasis vertebrales secundarias a carcinoma de mama. MÉTODOS: Veintidós pacientes operados con enfermedad metastásica espinal secundaria a carcinoma de mama fueron evaluadas antes de la cirugía, inmediatamente después de la operación y después de 1 mes y 6 meses de la cirugía, mediante la escala numérica del dolor y el índice de discapacidad de Oswestry. RESULTADOS: Las medidas para el dolor produjeron un valor de "p" de 0,0001 para la diferencia entre el pre y postoperatorio, 0,0005 entre el postoperatorio inmediato y un mes después de la operación, y 0,0908 entre 1 mes después de la cirugía y el postoperatorio de 6 meses, por lo tanto, son la evidencia de las diferencias entre el pre y postoperatorio, así como entre el postoperatorio inmediato y después de un mes, pero no hay evidencia de tales diferencias entre 1 y 6 meses después de la operación. En cuanto al ODI, la diferencia fue significativa en todas las épocas. CONCLUSIÓN: El procedimiento mejora el dolor y reduce la discapacidad en pacientes con enfermedad metastásica secundaria a carcinoma de mama.<br>OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of patients with spinal metastasis secondary to breast carcinoma. METHODS: Twenty-two patients operated spinal metastatic disease secondary to breast carcinoma were assessed preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and after 1 and 6 months of surgery, using the numerical scale of pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: The measures for pain produced a p-value of 0.0001 for the difference between the preoperative and postoperative, 0.0005 between the immediate postoperative period and 1 month postoperatively, and 0.0908 between 1 month and six months postoperatively, therefore, there is evidence of differences between the preoperative and postoperative periods, as well as between the immediate postoperative and after the 1st month, but there is no such evidence between 1st and 6th month postoperatively. As for the ODI, the difference was significant in all periods. CONCLUSION: The procedure improves pain and reduces disability in patients with metastatic disease secondary to breast cancer

    Analysis of orthopedic surgery of bone metastases in breast cancer patients

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of death in women. Because bone metastases are a common finding in patients with breast cancer, they are of major clinical concern.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In 115 consecutive patients with bone metastases secondary to breast cancer, 132 surgical procedures were performed. Medical records and imaging procedures were reviewed for age, treatment of the primary tumor, clinical symptoms, surgical treatment, complications, and survival.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The overall survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer was dependent on the site and the amount of the metastases. Age was not a prognostic factor for survival. If the result of the orthopaedic surgery was a wide resection (R0) survival was significantly better than in the R1 (marginal resection – tumor resection in sane tissue) or R2 (intralesional resection) situation. Concerning the orthopaedic procedures there was no survival difference.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In conclusion a wide (R0) resection and the absence of pathological fracture and visceral metastases were predictive for longer survival in univariate analysis. Age and the type of orthopaedic surgery had no impact on survival in multivariate analysis. The resection margins lost significance. The standard of care for patients with metastatic breast cancer to the bone requires a multidisciplinary approach.</p
    corecore