Methyl bromide alternatives in fresh tomato: First experiences

2 tab. 7 ref.Desde principios de la d?cada de los 90, la Universidad de Florida ha conducido centenares de estudios en b?squeda de alternativas al uso del bromuro de metilo (BrM) en vegetales, frutales y ornamentales. Debido a que el BrM va a usarse restringidamente a partir del a?o 2005, se condujeron estudios exploratorios para determinar posibles alternativas para reemplazar el BrM en tomate de mesa (Lycopersicon esculentum) producido en camas planas con coberturas pl?sticas (mulch). Dichas camas recibieron aplicaciones de fumigantes de suelo para combatir malezas, nematodos y enfermedades de suelo. El estudio examin? la eficacia de cloropicr?n (Pic), dazomet, 1,3-dicloropropeno (1,3-D), 1,3-D + Pic (C-17), metam sodio (MNa), C-17 + Pic, C-17 + MNa, y C-17 + pebulato para el control de malezas, nematodos y enfermedades de suelo en tomate de mesa. Los resultados indicaron que la aplicaci?n de C-17 en dosis de 250 kg/ha, combinado con pebulato a 4,5 kg/ha, mantuvo rendimientos similares a los del BrM y redujo consistentemente las densidades de la maleza Cyperus rotundus, as? como la incidencia del hongo de suelo Fusarium oxysporium f. sp. lycopersici, y el nematodo Meloidogyne spp. Since the beginning of the 90s, the University of Florida has conducted hundreds of trials searching for methyl bromide (MBr) alternatives in vegetables, ornamentals and fruit crops. Because the use of this fumigant will be restricted in 2005, preliminary studies were conducted to determine possible alternatives to replace MBr in mulched fresh tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Planting beds were applied with soil fungicides, nematicide and herbicide treatments. The studies examined the efficacy of chloropicrin (Pic), dazomet, 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D), 1,3-D + Pic (C-17), metam sodium (MNa), C-17 + Pic, C-17 + MNa, and C-17 + pebulate for weed, nematode, and soilborne disease control. The results indicated that the application of C-17 (250 kg/ha) combined with pebulate (4.5 kg/ha) consistently produced similar yield to that of MBr, and reduced Cyperus rotundus densities, and Fusarium oxysporium f. sp. lycopersici and Meloidogyne spp. incidence

Microbial Populations and Enzyme Activities in Soils Fumigated with Methyl Bromide Alternatives

Methyl bromide (MeBr; CH3Br) use for soil fumigation will be banned in 2005 due to its ozone depleting properties. Potential alternative chemicals to replace MeBr include chloropicrin (CP; CCl3NO2), 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D; C3H4Cl2), iodomethane (IM; CH3I), and propargyl bromide (PrBr; C3H3Br). The goal of this research was to assess changes in soil fungal populations, microbial biomass C (MBc) and respiration, nitrification potential, and enzyme activities after fumigation with MeBr and alternative fumigants. Four formulations of alternative fumigants (CP, InLine [61% 1,3-D plus 33% CP], Midas [50% IM plus 50% CPJ, and PrBr) were applied at commercial rates through drip irrigation systems to two field plots located in main strawberry production areas in California, USA. Soil samples (0-15 cm) were taken at 1, 4, and 30 or 37 wk after fumigant application. Fumigation with MeBr plus CP and the alternative chemicals eliminated soil-borne fungal pathogens in soil and reduced culturable fungal populations up to 4 wk post fumigation. Soil microbial respiration decreased with fumigant application and was the least (>40% reduction relative to the control) in the PrBr treatment I wk after fumigation, while soil MBc was not affected by fumigation. The activities of acid phosphatase and arylsulfatase were generally lower in fumigated soils over the 30-or 37-wk study, and those of P-glucosidase and dehydrogenase were lower up to 4 wk past fumigation. Potential nitrification rates were substantially reduced (>55% reduction relative to the control) by the fumigants, but rates recovered toward the end of this study. Results of this study suggested that fungal populations and the activities of acid phosphatase and arylsulfatase were more sensitive to fumigation with the tested MeBr and the alternative fumigants than total microbial biomass, microbial respiration, nitrification, and the activities of dehydrogenases and P-glucosidase. Short-term impacts of MeBr and its alternative fumigants on microbial activities and enzymatic processes suggest that all the tested fumigants have the potential to alter important microbial and enzymatic functions such as nutrient cycling