6 research outputs found
Peripheral organ equivalent dose estimation procedure in proton therapy
The aim of this work is to present a reproducible methodology for the evaluation of total equivalent doses in organs during proton therapy facilities. The methodology is based on measuring the dose equivalent in representative locations inside an anthropomorphic phantom where photon and neutron dosimeters were inserted. The Monte Carlo simulation was needed for obtaining neutron energy distribution inside the phantom. The methodology was implemented for a head irradiation case in the passive proton beam of iThemba Labs (South Africa). Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD)-600 and TLD-700 pairs were used as dosimeters inside the phantom and GEANT code for simulations. In addition, Bonner sphere spectrometry was performed inside the treatment room to obtain the neutron spectra, some relevant neutron dosimetric quantities per treatment Gy, and a percentual distribution of neutron fluence and ambient dose equivalent in four energy groups, at two locations. The neutron spectrum at one of those locations was also simulated so that a reasonable agreement between simulation and measurement allowed a validation of the simulation. Results showed that the total out-of-field dose equivalent inside the phantom ranged from 1.4 to 0.28 mSv/Gy, mainly due to the neutron contribution and with a small contribution from photons, 10% on average. The order of magnitude of the equivalent dose in organs was similar, displaying a slow reduction in values as the organ is farther from the target volume. These values were in agreement with those found by other authors in other passive beam facilities under similar irradiation and measurement conditions
A proposal for a Geant4 physics list for radiotherapy optimized in physics performance and CPU time
Precise dosimetric comparison between GAMOS and the collapsed cone convolution algorithm of 4D DOSE accumulated in lung SBRT treatments
Background: It is widely accepted that Monte Carlo dose calculations offers a higher precision that the
commercially available dose calculation algorithms. This advantage may be especially relevant for lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT), as this is a precise technique applied to an area of big inhomogeneity.
Purpose: We conducted a comparative study to reveal the differences between the doses calculated using the
Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm and the GAMOS/Geant4 Monte Carlo calculation for lung cancer patients
treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on an Elekta Versa HD linac.
Methods: For this study a set of ten patient treatments carried out at the Clínica Universidad de Navarra was
selected. Theanalysis is based on the comparison of several dosimetric quantities for the Gross Tumor Volume
(GTV) and several OrgansAt Risk (OARs), and also a gamma index calculation with distance-to-agreement set to
2 mm and dose difference to 3%, as recommended by ICRU to assess clinical impact. In order to guarantee a small
uncertainty in the Monte Carlo calculation of the dosimetric quantities, we studied in detail the validity of
different methods that may be used to determine this uncertainty.
To compensate for lung movements, a 4D-Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) was acquired before
treatment, whichallowed us to identify eight respiratory phases using a temporal binning. Using commercial
MIM software®, we performed a deformable image registration between the eight CT respiration phases to
construct the 4D doses. The same procedure was applied for the Treatment Planning System (TPS) dose files and
for the Monte Carlo dose files.
Results: The differences between the two algorithms reveal the known weaknesses of the Collapsed Cone
Convolution (CCC) algorithm for the calculation of lateral doses and in regions of large density change. The
comparison between the two algorithms for individual phase doses shows differences up to 5% of the GTV D95 or
3–4 Gy in some OARs, which may have a clinical impact. Nevertheless these differences are reduced for the 4D
dose in most quantities under study.
Conclusions: Comparing the dose calculated with a Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm with GAMOS/Geant4
for ten patients and eight respiratory phases, we found some differences that could have a clinical impact. When
combining the eight temporal phases into a 4D dose using the MIM Deformable Image Registration software, the
differences diminished substantially.
Our statistical analysis concludes that dose uncertainty in the voxels with a maximum dose below a given
percentage guarantees uncertainty in the dosimetric quantities below that figure
Peripheral organ equivalent dose estimation procedure in proton therapy
The aim of this work is to present a reproducible methodology for the evaluation of total equivalent doses in organs during proton therapy facilities. The methodology is based on measuring the dose equivalent in representative locations inside an anthropomorphic phantom where photon and neutron dosimeters were inserted. The Monte Carlo simulation was needed for obtaining neutron energy distribution inside the phantom. The methodology was implemented for a head irradiation case in the passive proton beam of iThemba Labs (South Africa). Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD)-600 and TLD-700 pairs were used as dosimeters inside the phantom and GEANT code for simulations. In addition, Bonner sphere spectrometry was performed inside the treatment room to obtain the neutron spectra, some relevant neutron dosimetric quantities per treatment Gy, and a percentual distribution of neutron fluence and ambient dose equivalent in four energy groups, at two locations. The neutron spectrum at one of those locations was also simulated so that a reasonable agreement between simulation and measurement allowed a validation of the simulation. Results showed that the total out-of-field dose equivalent inside the phantom ranged from 1.4 to 0.28 mSv/Gy, mainly due to the neutron contribution and with a small contribution from photons, 10% on average. The order of magnitude of the equivalent dose in organs was similar, displaying a slow reduction in values as the organ is farther from the target volume. These values were in agreement with those found by other authors in other passive beam facilities under similar irradiation and measurement conditions
Neutron spectra around a tandem linear accelerator in the generation of 18F with a bonner sphere spectrometer
International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium report, data summary of 50 countries for 2010-2015: Device-associated module
•We report INICC device-associated module data of 50 countries from 2010-2015.•We collected prospective data from 861,284 patients in 703 ICUs for 3,506,562 days.•DA-HAI rates and bacterial resistance were higher in the INICC ICUs than in CDC-NHSN's.•Device utilization ratio in the INICC ICUs was similar to CDC-NHSN's.
Background: We report the results of International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) surveillance study from January 2010-December 2015 in 703 intensive care units (ICUs) in Latin America, Europe, Eastern Mediterranean, Southeast Asia, and Western Pacific.
Methods: During the 6-year study period, using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC-NHSN) definitions for device-associated health care-associated infection (DA-HAI), we collected prospective data from 861,284 patients hospitalized in INICC hospital ICUs for an aggregate of 3,506,562 days.
Results: Although device use in INICC ICUs was similar to that reported from CDC-NHSN ICUs, DA-HAI rates were higher in the INICC ICUs: in the INICC medical-surgical ICUs, the pooled rate of central line-associated bloodstream infection, 4.1 per 1,000 central line-days, was nearly 5-fold higher than the 0.8 per 1,000 central line-days reported from comparable US ICUs, the overall rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia was also higher, 13.1 versus 0.9 per 1,000 ventilator-days, as was the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection, 5.07 versus 1.7 per 1,000 catheter-days. From blood cultures samples, frequencies of resistance of Pseudomonas isolates to amikacin (29.87% vs 10%) and to imipenem (44.3% vs 26.1%), and of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates to ceftazidime (73.2% vs 28.8%) and to imipenem (43.27% vs 12.8%) were also higher in the INICC ICUs compared with CDC-NHSN ICUs.
Conclusions: Although DA-HAIs in INICC ICU patients continue to be higher than the rates reported in CDC-NSHN ICUs representing the developed world, we have observed a significant trend toward the reduction of DA-HAI rates in INICC ICUs as shown in each international report. It is INICC's main goal to continue facilitating education, training, and basic and cost-effective tools and resources, such as standardized forms and an online platform, to tackle this problem effectively and systematically