28 research outputs found

    Introducing a new ICRU report: Prescribing, recording and reporting electron beam therapy

    Get PDF
    The ICRU published several Reports about volumes and doses specifications for radiotherapy, such as the Report 29 (1978), devoted to photon and electron beam therapy. This report 29 becoming absolete, a new Report was published in 1993 for external photon beam radiotherapy, the Report 50, recommending new definitions and more accurate specifications. With electran beams specific problems are raised, and the ICRU considered suitable to prepare a special Report for them, to be published in the near future.The main features of the present draft are as follows:1.Volumes specifications in agreement with the ICRU Report 50,•Volumes to be determined before treatment planning: gross tumour volume (GTV), c1inical target volume (CTV), organs at risk volumes (OR).•Volume to be determined during treatment planning: Planning target volume (PTV).•Volumes resulting fram the treatment plan chosen: treatment volume (TV), irradiated volume (IV).In the future Report on electron beams, an additional volume is defined, the internal target volume (ITV) geometrical concept representing the volume en-compassing the c1inical target volume, taking into consideration margins due to the variations of the clinical target volume in position, shape an size. A similar concept has been extended to organs at risk, the planning organ at risk volume.2.Dose specificationThe general statements for photon beams apply:•dose at a reference point (ICRU point) situated at or near the center of the planning target volume and, when possible, near or on the central axis of the electron beam at the depth of the peak dose.•Minimal and maximal doses in the planning target volume•Dose delivered to the organs at risk•Additional information is recommended, when possible (e.g. DVH).With electron beams, the dose homogeneity expected within the PTV (± 5 to ± 10 %) requires an adaptation of the terapeutic range concept, such that the value of the isodose surface encompassing the PTV be situated between 85 % and 95 % of the reference dose. The peak absorbed dose on the beam axis should always been specified, even if it is different fram the reference dose.At last, as in Report 50, three levels of dose evaluation for reporting are considered, depending on the aim of the treatment and the data available

    Oxford Textbook of Oncology

    No full text

    The influence of the use of CT-planning on the irradiated boost volume in breast conserving treatment.

    No full text
    Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of CT-based delineation and planning on the irradiated boost volume. For this specific purpose we used the data as derived from 2 prospective phase III randomised trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 1331 patients (<or=50 years) were analyzed with a reported boost volume from a simulation-based treatment plan (EORTC boost vs no boost trial, n=922), and a CT-scan-based treatment plan (Young Boost Trial, n=409) group. Tumour diameter, irradiation technique (photons vs electrons), lumpectomy size, and age were used as covariates. RESULTS: Median V(95%) in the conventional simulation-based treatment plans was 99 cc (range 9-628) for photons and was 98 cc (13-651) for electrons, whereas in the CT-planned patients, these figures were 178 cc (37-2699) and 150 cc (43-1272), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed an association of the irradiated boost volume with tumour size (p<0.0067), lumpectomy size (p<0.0002), and boost technique (p<0.0004). The use of a CT-scan for volume delineation and treatment planning remained significant (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a CT-scan for delineation and treatment planning led to a significant increase of the irradiated boost volume by a factor of 1.5-1.8, compared to conventional simulator-based plans
    corecore