1,172 research outputs found
'Seeing' the Difference: The Importance of Visibility and Action as a Mark of 'Authenticity' in Co-production ; Comment on āCollaboration and Co-production of Knowledge in Healthcare: Opportunities and Challengesā
The Rycroft-Malone paper states that co-production relies on āauthenticā collaboration as a context for action. Our
commentary supports and extends this assertion. We suggest that āauthenticā co-production involves processes where
participants can āseeā the difference that they have made within the project and beyond. We provide examples including:
the use of design in health projects which seek to address power issues and make contributions visible through iteration
and prototyping; and the development of āactionable outputsā from research that are the physical embodiment of coproduction.
Finally, we highlight the elements of the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care
(CLAHRC) architecture that enables the inclusion of such collaborative techniques that demonstrate visible co-production.
We reinforce the notion that maintaining collaboration requires time, flexible resources, blurring of knowledge produceruser
boundaries, and leaders who promote epistemological tolerance and methodological exploration
Keywords: Co-production, Knowledge Mobilisation, Design Approaches in Healthcare, Research Impact, Actionable
Tool
Innovating access to the nurse-led hepatitis C clinic using co-production
Background
Many reasons for missed appointments are given by people who inject drugs and it is suggested that one solution cannot solve this complex issue (Poll et al., 2017). Increasingly, nurses and other health professionals are expected to actively involve patients and service users in developing innovative, effective and accessible services. This project used co-production as the approach to address this challenge.
Aims
This paper describes how a co-production method was used to develop accessible nurse-led hepatitis C virus services for people who inject drugs.
Methods
Using research evidence from a study conducted by the lead author as a starting point, a series of co-production workshops were run using creative co-design methods to identify the barriers to engagement with clinics. Potential solutions were then co-produced.
Results
The solutions included myth-busting posters, peer-support, a mobile clinic van and the offer of incentives and enablers (travel costs or a reward for attendance).
Conclusions
The service-development project illustrates how, with the right methods, it is possible to successfully engage with hard-to-access groups to co-produce innovative solutions for an important clinical challenge
How was it for you? Experiences of participatory design in the UK health service
Improving co-design methods implies that we need to understand those methods, paying attention to not only the effect of method choices on design outcomes, but also how methods affect the people involved in co-design. In this article, we explore participants' experiences from a year-long participatory health service design project to develop āBetter Outpatient Services for Older Peopleā. The project followed a defined method called experience-based design (EBD), which represented the state of the art in participatory service design within the UK National Health Service. A sample of participants in the project took part in semi-structured interviews reflecting on their involvement in and their feelings about the project. Our findings suggest that the EBD method that we employed was successful in establishing positive working relationships among the different groups of stakeholders (staff, patients, carers, advocates and design researchers), although conflicts remained throughout the project. Participants' experiences highlighted issues of wider relevance in such participatory design: cost versus benefit, sense of project momentum, locus of control, and assumptions about how change takes place in a complex environment. We propose tactics for dealing with these issues that inform the future development of techniques in user-centred healthcare design
- ā¦