63 research outputs found
The impact of Participatory Budgeting on health and wellbeing:A scoping review of evaluations
Background: Participatory budgeting (PB), citizens deliberating among themselves and with officials to decide how
to allocate funds for public goods, has been increasingly implemented across Europe and worldwide. While PB is
recommended as good practice by the World Bank and the United Nations, with potential to improve health and
wellbeing, it is unclear what evaluations have been conducted on the impact of PB on health and wellbeing.
Methods: For this scoping review, we searched 21 databases with no restrictions on publication date or language.
The search term âparticipatory budgetâ was used as the relevant global label for the intervention of interest. Studies
were included if they reported original analysis of health, social, political, or economic and budgetary outcomes of
PB. We examined the study design, analysis, outcomes and location of included articles. Findings are reported
narratively.
Results: From 1458 identified references, 37 studies were included. The majority of evaluations (n = 24) were of PB
in South America, seven were in Europe. Most evaluations were case studies (n = 23) conducting ethnography and
surveys, focussing on political outcomes such as participation in PB or impacts on political activities. All of the
quantitative observational studies analysing population level data, except one in Russia, were conducted in South
America.
Conclusion: Despite increasing interest in PB, evaluations applying robust methods to analyse health and
wellbeing outcomes are scarce, particularly beyond Brazil. Therefore, implementation of PB schemes should be
accompanied by rigorous qualitative and quantitative evaluation to identify impacts and the processes by which
they are realised
Control of urea hydrolysis and nitrification in soil by chemicals - Prospects and problems
A review is made of the recent work to assess the prospects of regulating urea hydrolysis and nitrification processes in soils by employing chemicals that can retard urea hydrolysis and nitrification. The possible benefits from control of nitrogen transformations in terms of conserving and enhancing fertilizer nitrogen efficiency for crop production and the problems associated with their use with regard to N metabolism of plants have also been discussed with examples. Prospects of using cheap and effective indigenous materials and chemicals for control of urea hydrolysis and nitrification under specific soil situations appear eminent in improving the fertilizer nitrogen efficiency. Urease inhibitors may be helpful in reducing problems associated with ammonia volatilization if this is not offset by leaching of urea. On the other hand retardation of nitrification appears useful in reducing losses that accompany nitrification due to leaching and denitrification, and with the plants that metabolize equally well with relatively higher amounts of NH4âN may be more effective in improving the utilization of fertilizer N under these situation
- âŠ