473 research outputs found

    Effects of 4-hydroxytamoxifen and a novel pure antioestrogen (ICI 182780) on the clonogenic growth of human breast cancer cells in vitro.

    Get PDF
    We have investigated the effects on breast cancer cell growth of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT), a conventional antioestrogen with agonist activity, and 7 alpha-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulphinyl)nonyl]oestra- 1,3,5,(10)- triene-3,17 beta-diol (ICI 182780), a novel, pure antioestrogen, using established human breast cancer cell lines and cancer cells obtained directly from breast cancer patients with malignant pleural effusions who had relapsed on tamoxifen. The effects of the two agents were assessed using the Courtenay-Mills clonogenic assay, which measures the growth of single cancer cells as colonies suspended in soft agar. The standard assay was modified by the use of defined serum- and phenol red-free growth medium. The growth of oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive MCF-7 cells in the assay was oestrogen responsive. Both antioestrogens inhibited the stimulatory effects of 1 nM oestradiol, but ICI 182780 caused significantly greater inhibition than 4OHT at 0.1-1.0 microM concentrations. In the absence of oestradiol, 4OHT but not ICI 182780 caused significant stimulation of colony formation at low (0.01-1.00 nM) concentrations. Neither antioestrogen had any effects on colony formation by the ER-negative Hs578T cell line. Successful colony formation was obtained in primary cultures from six out of eight malignant effusions. Colony formation was significantly stimulated by 0.1 nM oestradiol in four cases and by 10 nM 40HT in two cases. In contrast, ICI 182780 exhibited no intrinsic stimulatory activity and significantly inhibited both oestradiol- and 4OHT-stimulated cell growth. We conclude that the agonist activity of 4OHT and other conventional antioestrogens may cause treatment failure in some patients by stimulating breast cancer cell growth. The new, pure antioestrogen ICI 182780 is a more potent oestrogen antagonist than 4OHT and exhibits no growth-stimulatory activity. This agent may therefore offer therapeutic advantages over conventional antioestrogens in patients with advanced breast cancer and may be effective after conventional agents have failed

    Lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis in breast cancer

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>There have been few studies on lymphangiogenesis in the past due to the lack of specific lymphatic endothelial markers, and lymphatic-specific growth factors. Recently, these limitations have been relieved by the discovery of a small number of potential lymphatic-specific markers. The relationship between lymphangiogenesis and regional or distant metastasis has not previously been investigated in humans. Using these lymphatic markers, it is possible to explore the relationship between lymphangiogenesis and tumour metastasis. This study indirectly quantified lymphangiogenesis by measuring mRNA expression of all seven lymphatic markers described above in breast cancers and correlated these markers with lymphatic involvement and survival.</p> <p>The cDNA from 153 frozen archived breast samples were analysed with Q-PCR for all seven lymphangiogenic markers. This was correlated with various prognostic factors as well as patient survival.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was significantly greater expression of all 7 markers in malignant compared to benign breast tissue. In addition, there was greater expression in lymph node positive/grade 3 tumours when compared to lymph node negative/grade 1 tumours. In 5 of the markers, there was a greater expression in poor NPI prognostic tumours when compared to favourable prognostic tumours which was not statistically significant. There was no association between recurrence risk and lymphangiogenic marker expression.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In summary, the findings from this study show that lymphangiogenesis, measured by specific lymphatic marker expression, is higher in breast cancers than in normal breast tissue. Secondly, breast cancers which have metastasised to the regional lymphatics show higher expression compared to those which have not, although the individual differences for all five markers were not statistically significant.</p
    • …
    corecore