Environmental geotechnics: Challenges and opportunities in the post-Covid-19 world

The outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic not only has created a health crisis across the world but is also expected to impact negatively the global economy and societies at a scale that is maybe larger than that of the 2008 financial crisis. Simultaneously, it has inevitably exerted many negative consequences on the geoenvironment on which human beings depend. The current paper articulates the role of environmental geotechnics in elucidating and mitigating the effects of the current pandemic. It is the belief of all authors that the Covid-19 pandemic presents not only significant challenges but also opportunities for the development of the environmental geotechnics field. This discipline should make full use of geoenvironmental researchers' and engineers' professional skills and expertise to look for development opportunities from this crisis, to highlight the irreplaceable position of the discipline in the global fight against pandemics and to contribute to the health and prosperity of communities, to serve humankind better. In order to reach this goal while taking into account the specificity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the uncertainty of its environmental effects, it is believed that more emphasis should be placed on the following research directions: pathogen-soil interactions; isolation and remediation technologies for pathogen-contaminated sites; new materials for pathogen-contaminated soil; recycling and safe disposal of medical wastes; quantification of uncertainty in geoenvironmental and epidemiological problems; emerging technologies and adaptation strategies in civil, geotechnical and geoenvironmental infrastructures; pandemic-induced environmental risk management; and modelling of pathogen transport and fate in geoenvironment, among others. Moreover, Covid-19 has made it clear to the environmental geotechnics community the importance of urgent international co-operation and of multidisciplinary research actions that must extend to a broad range of scientific fields, including medical and public health disciplines, in order to meet the complexities posed by the Covid-19 pandemic

Small airway pathology and bronchoreversibility in advanced emphysema.

BACKGROUND: Poorly reversible airflow obstruction is a hallmark feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, some COPD patients demonstrate significant bronchodilator reversibility (BDR). The pathologic features associated with the presence or absence of this phenomenon are not known. METHODS: We analyzed 67 patients with advanced upper lobe predominant emphysema who underwent lung volume reduction surgery and divided them into 2 groups: the reversible group [BD(+)] had a \u3e12% and \u3e200 mL increase in FEV(1) or FVC with bronchodilator; the irreversible group [BD(-)] had a RESULTS: Despite similar baseline characteristics, the BD(+) group had a smaller EH (0.036 mm vs. 0.042 mm, p = 0.005) and EH/BMP (0.012 vs. 0.014, p = 0.007), and a greater SMWA/BMA (0.491 vs. 0.430, p = 0.034) compared to the BD(-) group. In addition, EA trended to be smaller in the BD(+) group when compared to the BD(-) group (0.160 mm(2) vs. 0.184 mm(2), p = 0.06). In a subset of patients with consistent patterns of BDR on serial testing, the BD(+) group had greater SMWA/BMA (0.518 vs. 0.433, p = 0.049) and TWA/BMA (1.405 vs. 1.266, p = 0.036) compared to the BD(-) group. CONCLUSIONS: Small airway smooth muscle mass may play a role in determining BDR in severe emphysema