Patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals: A rapid review

Background Codesign strengthens partnerships between healthcare workers and patients. It also facilitates collaborations supporting the development, design and delivery of healthcare services. Prior rehabilitation reviews have focused mainly on the clinical and organisational outcomes of codesign with less focus on the lived experience of rehabilitation patients. Objective To explore patient experiences of codesigned hospital rehabilitation interventions. Design Rapid review and evidence synthesis of the literature. Data sources CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane were searched from 1 January 2000 to 25 April 2022. Study selection Studies reporting patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals. Results 4156 studies were screened, and 38 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility. Seven studies were included in the final rapid review. Five out of the seven studies involved neurological rehabilitation. All eligible studies used qualitative research methods. The main barriers to codesign were related to staffing and dedicated time allocated to face-to-face patient-therapist interactions. High-quality relationships between patients and their therapists were a facilitator of codesign. Thematic synthesis revealed that codesigned rehabilitation interventions can enable a meaningful experience for patients and facilitate tailoring of treatments to align with individual needs. Personalised rehabilitation increases patient involvement in rehabilitation planning, delivery and decision-making. It also promotes positive feelings of empowerment and hope. Conclusion This rapid review supports the implementation of codesigned rehabilitation interventions to improve patient experiences in hospitals. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021264547

Severe exacerbations in moderate-to-severe asthmatics are associated with increased pro-inflammatory and type 1 mediators in sputum and serum.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a heterogeneous disease and understanding this heterogeneity will enable the realisation of precision medicine. We sought to compare the sputum and serum inflammatory profiles in moderate-to-severe asthma during stable disease and exacerbation events. METHODS: We recruited 102 adults and 34 children with asthma. The adults were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12-month follow-up visits. Thirty-seven subjects were assessed at onset of severe exacerbation. Forty sputum mediators and 43 serum mediators were measured. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to identify mediators that distinguish between stable disease and exacerbation events. The strongest discriminating sputum mediators in the adults were validated in the children. RESULTS: The mediators that were significantly increased at exacerbations versus stable disease and by ≥1.5-fold were sputum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-6R, IL-18, CXCL9, CXCL10, CCL5, TNFα, TNF-R1, TNF-R2, and CHTR and serum CXCL11. No mediators decreased ≥1.5-fold at exacerbation. The strongest discriminators of an exacerbation in adults (ROC area under the curve [AUC]) were sputum TNF-R2 0.69 (95% CI: 0.60 to 0.78) and IL-6R 0.68 (95% CI: 0.58 to 0.78). Sputum TNF-R2 and IL-6R were also discriminatory in children (ROC AUC 0.85 [95% CI: 0.71 to 0.99] and 0.80 [0.64 to 0.96] respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Severe asthma exacerbations are associated with increased pro-inflammatory and Type 1 (T1) immune mediators. In adults, sputum TNF-R2 and IL-6R were the strongest discriminators of an exacerbation, which were verified in children