What's next for the neurobiology of temperament, personality and psychopathology?

This paper represents the outcome of a multidisciplinary discussion on what works, what doesn't, and what can be improved, in on-going work on bio-behavioural taxonomies and their biomarkers. The authors of this paper, representing a wide spectrum of bio-behavioural disciplines (clinical, developmental, differential psychology, neurophysiology, endocrinology, psychiatry, neurochemistry, neurosciences), have contributed more extensive opinions to the Theme Issue "Neurobiology of temperament, personality and psychopathology: what's next?". The authors identified ten directions in international and multidisciplinary cooperation, and multiple insights for "what is next" for each of these directions

What is next for the neurobiology of temperament, personality and psychopathology?

This paper represents the outcome of a multidisciplinary discussion on what works, what does not, and what can be improved, in ongoing work on biobehavioral taxonomies and their biomarkers. The authors of this paper, representing a wide spectrum of biobehavioral disciplines (clinical, developmental, differential psychology, neurophysiology, endocrinology, psychiatry, neurochemistry, and neurosciences), have contributed more extensive opinions to the Theme Issue 'Neurobiology of temperament, personality and psychopathology: what's next?'. The authors identified 10 directions in international and multidisciplinary cooperation, and multiple insights for ‘what is next’ for each of these directions

Journal. Rno Microelectronic Engineering 1987

The papers which follow summarize the results of researchperformed by the graduating seniors from the MicroelectronicEngineering Program at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT).In their final quarter (ten weeks) of study, the students submit aproposal for a research topic covering the relevance of theirproject to both the Microelectronics field and the Engineeringprogram at RIT, as well as a tentative timetable and budget. Aftera faculty critique, the project is either accepted as proposed orrevised. Thereafter, the student executes the researchindependently over the course of the quarter. The students meetweekly with the course coordinator to monitor progress, obtainsupplies, and revise the experiment as results develop. In additionto the research, their results are presented orally at the AnnualMicroelectronic Engineering Conference and in written form in thisjournal . The student is free (and encouraged) to seek the guidanceof other faculty members, both in and outside the MicroelectronicEngineering Faculty, researchers at other institutes, or industrialcolleagues.https://scholarworks.rit.edu/meec_archive/1001/thumbnail.jp