Surgeon Personal Factors Associated with Care Strategies in Musculoskeletal Telehealth

Background: Most surgeons used, or are currently using telehealth during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. We studied surgeon personal factors associated with relative use of telehealth during the worldwide height of the pandemic. Questions/Purposes: (1) Are there any personal factors/characteristics associated with use and utilization of telehealth? (2) What are surgeon’s perspectives/ opinions with regard to use of telehealth for five common upper extremity conditions in terms of future prospects and viability? Methods: Hand and upper extremity surgeons in the Science of Variation Group (SOVG) were invited to participate in a web-based survey. The first part of the survey focused on surgeon characteristics and work preferences. The second part focused on care strategies during the pandemic and utilization of telehealth. The final part of the survey addressed the care of five common upper extremity conditions during the pandemic. Results: Ninety percent of surgeons used telehealth during the first few months of the pandemic, but only 20% of visits were virtual. A greater percentage of telehealth visits compared to office visits was independently associated with a policy of only seeing people with emergencies in person (RC: 0.64; CI 95%: 0.21 to 1.1; P&lt;0.01). Surgeons found it difficult to reproduce most parts of the physical examination on video, but relatively easy to make a diagnosis, with both ratings associated with less belief that the physical exam is essential. Comfort in offering surgery by video visit was associated with having young children, preference for remote meetings, and less belief that the physical exam is essential. Conclusion: Utilization of, and comfort with, telehealth is related to personal factors and preferences, acceptance of a more limited physical examination in particular. Utilization of early adopters and training to increase comfort with the probabilistic aspects of medicine could facilitate incorporation of telehealth into standard practice.</p

In Vivo Length Changes Between the Attachments of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex Fibers in Knees With Anatomic Risk Factors for Patellar Instability

Background: Medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) reconstruction plays an important role in the surgical treatment of patellar instability. Anatomic reconstruction is critical in re-creating the native function of the ligament, which includes minimizing length changes that occur in early flexion. Anatomic risk factors for patellar instability such as trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, and increased tibial tuberosity to trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance have been shown to influence the function of the MPFC graft in cadaveric studies, but the native length change patterns of the MPFC fibers in knees with anatomic risk factors have not been described. Purpose: To describe the in vivo length changes of the MPFC fibers in knees with anatomic risk factors for patellar instability and identify the optimal attachment sites for MPFC reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Dynamic computed tomography imaging was performed on the asymptomatic knee in patients with contralateral patellar instability. Three-dimensional digital knee models were created to assess knees between 0° and 50° of flexion in 10° increments. MPFC fiber lengths were calculated at each flexion angle between known anatomic attachment points on the extensor mechanism (quadriceps tendon, MPFC midpoint [M], and patella) and femur (1, 2, and 3, representing the proximal to distal femoral footprint). Changes in MPFC fiber length were compared for each condition and assessed for their relationships to morphologic risk factors (trochlear depth, Caton Deschamps Index [CDI], and TT-TG distance). Results: In 22 knees, native MPFC fibers were found to be longer at 0° than at 20° to 50° of flexion. Length changes observed between 0° and 50° increased with the number of risk factors present. In the central fibers of the MPFC (M-2), 1.7% ± 3.1% length change was noted in knees with no anatomic risk factors, which increased to 5.6% ± 4.6%, 17.0% ± 6.4%, and 26.7% ± 6.8% in the setting of 1, 2, and 3 risk factors, respectively. Nonanatomic patella-based attachments were more likely to demonstrate unfavorable length change patterns, in which length was greater at 50° than 0°. In patellar attachments, an independent relationship was found between increasing length changes and TT-TG distance, while in quadriceps tendon attachments, a trend toward a negative relationship between length changes and CDI was noted. All configurations demonstrated a strong relationship between percentage change in length and number of morphologic risk factors present, with the greatest influence found in patella-based attachments. Conclusion: The MPFC fibers demonstrated increased length changes in knees when a greater number of morphological risk factors for patellar instability were present, which worsened in the setting of nonanatomic configurations. This suggests that the function of the intact MPFC in patients with anatomic risk factors may not reflect previously described findings in anatomically normal knees. Further studies are needed to understand the pathoanatomy related to these changes, as well as the implications for graft placement and assessment of length changes during MPFC reconstruction techniques. Clinical Relevance: MPFC length change patterns vary based on the number of morphologic risk factors for patellar instability present and should be considered during reconstructive procedures.</p

The Zagreb indices of graphs with a given clique number

AbstractFor a (molecular) graph, the first Zagreb index M1 is equal to the sum of squares of the degrees of vertices, and the second Zagreb index M2 is equal to the sum of the products of the degrees of pairs of adjacent vertices. Let Wn,k be the set of connected n-vertex graphs with clique number k. In this work we characterize the graphs from Wn,k with extremal (maximal and minimal) Zagreb indices, and determine the values of corresponding indices

Surgical site infection after wound closure with staples versus sutures in elective knee and hip arthroplasty:a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to study surgical site infection of wound closure using staples versus sutures in elective knee and hip arthroplasties. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to search for randomized controlled trials that compared surgical site infection after wound closure using staples versus sutures in elective knee and hip arthroplasties. The primary outcome was surgical site infection. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. The relative risk and 95% confidence interval with a random-effects model were assessed. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in this study, including 2 studies with a low risk of bias, 4 studies having ‘some concerns’, and 2 studies with high risk of bias. Significant difference was not found in the risk of SSI for patients with staples (n = 557) versus sutures (n = 573) (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 0.94–3.08, I(2) = 16%). The results were similar after excluding the studies with a high risk of bias (RR: 1.67, 95% CI: 0.91–3.07, I(2) = 32%). Analysis of studies with low risk of bias revealed a significantly higher risk of surgical site infection in patients with staples (n = 331) compared to sutures (n = 331) (RR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.20–5.44, I(2) = 0%). There was no difference between continuous and interrupted sutures (P > 0.05). In hip arthroplasty, stapling carried a significantly higher risk of surgical site infection than suturing (RR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.15–5.50, I(2) = 0%), but there was no significant difference in knee arthroplasty (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.33–2.25, I(2) = 22%; P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Stapling might carry a higher risk of surgical site infection than suturing in elective knee and hip arthroplasties, especially in hip arthroplasty. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42836-021-00110-7

Intramedullary nailing versus sliding hip screw for A1 and A2 trochanteric hip fractures

AIMS: This study evaluated variation in the surgical treatment of stable (A1) and unstable (A2) trochanteric hip fractures among an international group of orthopaedic surgeons, and determined the influence of patient, fracture, and surgeon characteristics on choice of implant (intramedullary nailing (IMN) versus sliding hip screw (SHS)). METHODS: A total of 128 orthopaedic surgeons in the Science of Variation Group evaluated radiographs of 30 patients with Type A1 and A2 trochanteric hip fractures and indicated their preferred treatment: IMN or SHS. The management of Type A3 (reverse obliquity) trochanteric fractures was not evaluated. Agreement between surgeons was calculated using multirater kappa. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess whether patient, fracture, and surgeon characteristics were independently associated with choice of implant. RESULTS: The overall agreement between surgeons on implant choice was fair (kappa = 0.27 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 0.28)). Factors associated with preference for IMN included USA compared to Europe or the UK (Europe odds ratio (OR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.67); UK OR 0.16 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.22); p < 0.001); exposure to IMN only during training compared to surgeons that were exposed to both (only IMN during training OR 2.6 (95% CI 2.0 to 3.4); p < 0.001); and A2 compared to A1 fractures (Type A2 OR 10 (95% CI 8.4 to 12); p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In an international cohort of orthopaedic surgeons, there was a large variation in implant preference for patients with A1 and A2 trochanteric fractures. This is due to surgeon bias (country of practice and aspects of training). The observation that surgeons favoured the more expensive implant (IMN) in the absence of convincing evidence of its superiority suggests that surgeon de-biasing strategies may be a useful focus for optimizing patient outcomes and promoting value-based healthcare. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):775-781

Agreement on fixation of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures

Background Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures (pSCHFs) may be challenging injuries to treat because of the potential residual deformity. There is debate regarding the technical aspects of adequate closed reduction and crossed Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation. Purpose Do surgeons have an agreement on the aspects of the fixation of pSCHFs? Methods Radiographs of 20 patients from a cohort of 154 patients with pSCHFs treated with closed reduction and crossed K-wire fixation were selected. Forty-four surgeons viewed the postoperative radiographs and diagnosed the presence or absence of technical flaws and made a recommendation for or against reoperation. An expert panel of three orthopedic and trauma surgeons provided a reference standard for technical factors. Furthermore, final outcome 2 years after trauma was assessed. Results There was limited agreement on potential technical flaws (ICC 0.15-0.28), radiographic measures of alignment (ICC for anterior humeral line and Baumann angle of 0.37 and 0.23 respectively), the quality of postoperative reduction, position of the elbow in cast, and recommendation for repeat surgery (ICCs between 0.23 and 0.40). Sensitivity and specificity for these questions ranged from 0.59 to 0.90. There was no correlation between the voted quality of postoperative reduction and loss of reduction or final function. Conclusions Surgeons have limited agreement on the quality of postoperative results in pSCHFs and the indication for reoperation. Reviewing postoperative radiographs may present a good learning opportunity and could help improve skills, but it is not a validated method for quality control and has to be seen in light of clinical outcome

Are 3D-printed Models of Tibial Plateau Fractures a Useful Addition to Understanding Fractures for Junior Surgeons?

Background Tibial plateau fractures are often complex, and they can be challenging to treat. Classifying fractures is often part of the treatment process, but intra- and interobserver reliability of fracture classification systems often is inadequate to the task, and classifications that lack reliability can mislead providers and result in harm to patients. Three-dimensionally (3D)-printed models might help in this regard, but whether that is the case for the classification of tibial plateau fractures, and whether the utility of such models might vary by the experience of the individual classifying the fractures, is unknown. Questions/purposes (1) Does the overall interobserver agreement improve when fractures are classified with 3D-printed models compared with conventional radiology? (2) Does interobserver agreement vary among attending and consultant trauma surgeons, senior surgical residents, and junior surgical residents? (3) Do surgeons' and surgical residents' confidence and accuracy improve when tibial plateau fractures are classified with an additional 3D model compared with conventional radiology? Methods Between 2012 and 2020, 113 patients with tibial plateau fractures were treated at a Level 1 trauma center. Forty-four patients were excluded based on the presence of bone diseases (such as osteoporosis) and the absence of a CT scan. To increase the chance to detect an improvement or deterioration and to prevent observers from losing focus during the classification, we decided to include 40 patients with tibial plateau fractures. Nine trauma surgeons, eight senior surgical residents, and eight junior surgical residents-none of whom underwent any study-specific pretraining-classified these fractures according to three often-used classification systems (Schatzker, OA/OTA, and the Luo three-column concept), with and without 3D-printed models, and they indicated their overall confidence on a 10-point Likert scale, with 0 meaning not confident at all and 10 absolutely certainty. To set the gold standard, a panel of three experienced trauma surgeons who had special expertise in knee surgery and 10 years to 25 years of experience in practice also classified the fractures until consensus was reached. The Fleiss kappa was used to determine interobserver agreement for fracture classification. Differences in confidence in assessing fractures with and without the 3D-printed model were compared using a paired t-test. Accuracy was calculated by comparing the participants' observations with the gold standard. Results The overall interobserver agreement improved minimally for fracture classification according to two of three classification systems (Schatzker: kappa(conv) = 0.514 versus kappa(3Dprint) = 0.539; p = 0.005; AO/OTA:kappa(conv) = 0.359 versus kappa(3Dprint) = 0.372; p = 0.03). However, none of the classification systems, even when used by our most experienced group of trauma surgeons, achieved more than moderate interobserver agreement, meaning that a large proportion of fractures were misclassified by at least one observer. Overall, there was no improvement in self-assessed confidence in classifying fractures or accuracy with 3D-printed models; confidence was high (about 7 points on a 10-point scale) as rated by all observers, despite moderate or worse accuracy and interobserver agreement Conclusion Although 3D-printed models minimally improved the overall interobserver agreement for two of three classification systems, none of the classification systems achieved more than moderate interobserver agreement. This suggests that even with 3D-printed models, many fractures would be misclassified, which could result in misleading communication, inaccurate prognostic assessments, unclear research, and incorrect treatment choices. Therefore, we cannot recommend the use of 3D-printed models in practice and research for classification of tibial plateau fractures

An increasing number of convolutional neural networks for fracture recognition and classification in orthopaedics:are these externally validated and ready for clinical application?

Aims: The number of convolutional neural networks (CNN) available for fracture detection and classification is rapidly increasing. External validation of a CNN on a temporally separate (separated by time) or geographically separate (separated by location) dataset is crucial to assess generalizability of the CNN before application to clinical practice in other institutions. We aimed to answer the following questions: are current CNNs for fracture recognition externally valid?; which methods are applied for external validation (EV)?; and, what are reported performances of the EV sets compared to the internal validation (IV) sets of these CNNs? Methods: The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched from January 2010 to October 2020 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The type of EV, characteristics of the external dataset, and diagnostic performance characteristics on the IV and EV datasets were collected and compared. Quality assessment was conducted using a seven-item checklist based on a modified Methodologic Index for NOn-Randomized Studies instrument (MINORS). Results: Out of 1,349 studies, 36 reported development of a CNN for fracture detection and/or classification. Of these, only four (11%) reported a form of EV. One study used temporal EV, one conducted both temporal and geographical EV, and two used geographical EV. When comparing the CNN’s performance on the IV set versus the EV set, the following were found: AUCs of 0.967 (IV) versus 0.975 (EV), 0.976 (IV) versus 0.985 to 0.992 (EV), 0.93 to 0.96 (IV) versus 0.80 to 0.89 (EV), and F1-scores of 0.856 to 0.863 (IV) versus 0.757 to 0.840 (EV). Conclusion: The number of externally validated CNNs in orthopaedic trauma for fracture recognition is still scarce. This greatly limits the potential for transfer of these CNNs from the developing institute to another hospital to achieve similar diagnostic performance. We recommend the use of geographical EV and statements such as the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials–Artificial Intelligence (CONSORT-AI), the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials–Artificial Intelligence (SPIRIT-AI) and the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis–Machine Learning (TRIPOD-ML) to critically appraise performance of CNNs and improve methodological rigor, quality of future models, and facilitate eventual implementation in clinical practice

The value of radiographic markers in the diagnostic work-up of rotator cuff tears, an arthroscopic correlated study

Objective To evaluate the value of radiographs during the diagnostic work-up of rotator cuff tears, using arthroscopy as reference standard. Materials and methods This retrospective study included 236 shoulders of 236 patients. All radiographs were evaluated for inferior cortical acromial sclerosis, lateral acromial spur, superior migration of the humeral head, greater tubercle cysts, and subacromial space calcifications. Predictive value of these radiographic signs in predicting rotator cuff tears was determined with arthroscopy as reference standard. Results According to arthroscopy, 131 shoulders were diagnosed with rotator cuff tears. Seventy-two out of 131 shoulders (55%) had inferior cortical acromial sclerosis, 37 (28%) lateral acromial spur, 21 (16%) superior migration of the humeral head, 7 (5%) greater tubercle cysts and 15 subacromial space calcifications (11%). Inferior cortical acromial sclerosis (P = 0.001), lateral spur (P = 0.001), superior migration (P = 0.002), and cysts (P = 0.03) were significantly and independently associated with rotator cuff tears, whereas subacromial calcifications (p = 0.21) was not. Inferior cortical acromial sclerosis, superior migration, lateral acromial spur, and cysts combined have a positive predictive value of 78%. Conclusions The combination of inferior cortical acromial sclerosis, lateral acromial spur, superior migration of the humeral head, and greater tubercle cysts has a high positive predictive value for the presence of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. In patients with a high suspicion for having a rotator cuff tear based on radiographic findings, MRI can be performed directly without the delay and costs caused by an additional ultrasound exam