IMPROVE-PD Finder: A Web-Based Platform to Search and Share Peritoneal Dialysis Biobank, Registry, and Clinical Trial Metadata

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a life-sustaining kidney replacement therapy for the increasing number of people with permanent kidney failure across all age groups worldwide. Although PD potentially offers socioeconomic and performance benefits over hemodialysis, both treatments severely accelerate complications of chronic kidney disease, in particular atherosclerotic disease progression that worsens outcomes when compared with non-dialysis patients.1 Improved understanding of the underlying molecular pathogenic mechanisms should help in the design of interventions that improve outcomes.2 Current state of the art in PD research, however, faces major limitations. Although there are numerous in vitro and ex vivo studies on complex cellular and molecular networks active in PD3, 4, 5 and in vivo animal models of PD6, 7, 8 that provide in-depth pathomechanistic insights and allow identification of promising therapeutic targets,9,S1,S2 translation into clinical studies is a major challenge.S3 Patient studies that aim to substantiate experimental findings with definitive clinical outcome data are mostly small. As a result, they have not provided sufficient power to derive meaningful or clinically implementable conclusions.2 Basic PD technique has hardly changed over decades, despite high PD-related complication rates. Randomized prospective trials with hard clinical end points studied with adequate power are difficult to realize in a multifactorial setting with low patient numbers (360,000 worldwide) and are associated with high costs. To overcome these barriers intermediate end points such as PD effluent biomarkers associated (but not necessarily causally related) with hard clinical end points and composite end points are often studied.S4,S5 Equally, combining analyses of existing cohort studies and trial data through collaborative sharing might be of considerable benefit

Comparison of Outcomes of Patients With Versus Without Chronic Liver Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

There are limited data on the outcomes of chronic liver disease (CLD) patients admitted for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). All PCI hospitalizations from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2004 to 2015) were analyzed and stratified by the presence, cause and severity of CLD, as well as the indication for PCI. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of in-hospital adverse outcomes in patients with CLD compared with those without CLD. Among 7,296,679 PCI admissions, 54,368 (0.7%) had a CLD diagnosis. Among patients with CLD, 36,853 (67.8%) had severe CLD. Patients with CLD had higher likelihood of adverse outcomes including major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (aOR 1.25, 95%CI 1.20 to 1.30), mortality (aOR 1.43, 95%CI 1.35 to 1.51), major bleeding (aOR 2.22, 95%CI 2.12 to 2.32). When accounting for severity, only severe CLD subgroup was more likely to have MACCE and all-cause mortality compared to no-CLD patients (p \u3c0.001). Among CLD etiologic subgroups, those with ‘alcohol-related liver disease’ and ‘other CLD’ were consistently more likely to develop MACCE, all-cause mortality and major bleeding in comparison to no-CLD patients, while ‘chronic viral hepatitis’ subgroup had only increased odds of major bleeding (p \u3c0.001). In conclusion, CLD patients admitted for PCI are more likely to have worse in-hospital outcomes, particularly in the severe CLD subgroup and ‘alcohol-related liver disease’ and ‘other CLD’ etiologic subgroups

Relation of Extracardiac Vascular Disease and Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes (1.1 Million) Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Peer reviewedPostprin