Participation in Activities Fostering Children’s Development and Parental Concerns about Children’s Development: Results from a Population-Health Survey of Children Aged 0–5 Years in Quebec, Canada

Abstract : This study aims to: (1) describe children’s participation in activities fostering their development, (2) document parental concerns about their children’s development, and (3) explore the influences of family characteristics on children’s activity participation and parental concerns. We conducted a phone survey with parents of children aged 0-5 years (n = 895). Survey results are presented as weighted proportions for the parent's age, sex, and area of residence. Statistical comparisons were made using chi-square with p < 0.05. Most children were exposed at least weekly to fine motor (85.1% ± 2.4%), physical (83.0% ± 2.5%), and reading (84.2% ± 2.4%) activities. However, only a small proportion were exposed to those activities daily (49.7% ± 3.3%, 35.4% ± 3.2%, and 32.4% ± 3.1% respectively). Many (46.8%) parents had concerns about their children’s development. The most frequent domains of concern were communication skills (22.8% ± 2.8%), affective and behaviour skills (22.1% ± 2.7%), and autonomy (19.6% ± 2.6%). The proportion of parents having concerns was higher among families with lower incomes. The small proportion of children exposed daily to activities fostering their development, and the high proportion of parents with concerns about their children’s development are alarming. The integration of health and education services and the use of best practices fostering children’s development at home, at school, and in daycare centres is needed

Collaboration between Public Health and Schools: An Example of an Integrated Community Social Care Model

Introduction: There is a need to improve public health interventions to promote youth social and emotional development in close collaboration with schools, families and local communities. A close intersectoral collaboration between the regional public health, schools and school boards was established to co-construct and implement “Positive Intervention (PI)” in the Eastern Townships region (Quebec, Canada). This paper describes its implementation according to the “Integrated Community Care (ICC)” framework. Description: PI is a collaborative and personalized intervention leaning toward an integrated community social care model. In fact, PI relies on the close proximity between Public Health and their educational counterpart as well as their individual temporality. However, PI offered mainly social services and its relationships with Primary Care services was not yet a priority. Discussion: The results show that it is possible to develop and implement an intervention promoting positive mental health in children, with and for local organisations. The level of integration between schools and Public Health services achieved after only 6 months of implementation is encouraging. Conclusion: More research is needed to thoroughly document the implementation, social validity, and effects of such an intervention by taking in the point of view of all stakeholders.  Résumé Introduction: Il est nécessaire d’améliorer les interventions de santé publique pour promouvoir le développement social et émotionnel des jeunes en étroite collaboration avec les écoles, les familles et les communautés locales. Une telle collaboration intersectorielle entre la santé publique régionale, les écoles et les commissions scolaires a été mise en place pour coconstruire et mettre en œuvre l’Intervention positive (IP) en Estrie (Québec, Canada). Cet article décrit sa mise en œuvre initiale selon le cadre conceptuel des soins de santé et services sociaux intégrés en proximité des communautés. Description: L’IP est une intervention collaborative et personnalisée qui s’inscrit dans un modèle de services sociaux intégrés en proximité des communautés. En fait, l’IP s’appuie sur une forte proximité entre les services de santé publique et les milieux scolaires, ainsi qu’un ajustement à la temporalité des partenaires. Cependant, l’IP offre principalement des services sociaux et ses relations avec les services de soins primaires n’étaient pas encore une priorité. Discussion: Les résultats montrent qu’il est possible de développer et de mettre en œuvre une intervention de promotion de la santé mentale positive chez les enfants, avec et pour les organisations locales. Le niveau d’intégration entre les écoles et les services de santé publique atteint après seulement six mois de mise en œuvre est encourageant. Conclusion: Des recherches supplémentaires sont nécessaires pour documenter de manière approfondie la mise en œuvre, la validité sociale et les effets d’une telle intervention en prenant en compte le point de vue de toutes les parties prenantes. Mots-Clés: Santé mentale; promotion de la santé; étude de cas; intersectorialité; proximit

Barriers and facilitators to implementing community outreach work, and inter-professional collaboration with regional partners

Abstract : Objective. Community outreach workers support individuals in accessing the health and community services they require through various forms of proximity approaches. Even though community outreach has been available in the province of Quebec (Canada) for the past 40 years, it is still difficult to implement and sustain, especially with families of young children. The aim of this study was to document barriers and facilitators to implementing community outreach practices, and to describe how such workers collaborate with sectoral (e.g. health care) and inter-sectoral (e.g. municipalities, community organizations, schools) partners. Methodology. We performed a content analysis on 55 scientific and grey literature documents, and transcriptions of 24 individual interviews and 3 focus groups with stakeholders including parents, community outreach workers, health care employees, and inter-sectoral partners. Results. This study reveals four categories of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of community outreach work (i.e. organizational factors, nature of the work and worker-related factors, family-related factors, external factors). With regards to collaboration, community outreach workers deal with various partners. Good inter-professional collaboration is achieved through positive interactions and communication, shared or co-developed activities for the families, co-intervention with families, and strategies to enhance role awareness and inter-sectoral meetings. Conclusion. Results highlighted that many factors interact and can either influence, positively or negatively, the opportunity to implement community outreach work. The collaborative practices identified may help to maximize facilitators and overcome barriers. Advocacy and a better understanding of how to integrate community outreach work within health services while maintaining the workers’ flexibility are needed to sustain this practice