Socio-economic variations in anticipated adverse reactions to testing HPV positive: Implications for the introduction of primary HPV-based cervical screening

Some cervical cancer screening programmes are replacing cytology with human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing as the primary screening test. Concerns have been previously raised around the potential psychosocial impact of testing positive for HPV. We analysed socio-economic variations in anticipated adverse reactions to testing positive for HPV in women of screening age in the general population. A questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 5553 women aged 20-64 in 2010, selected through primary care in Ireland. This included questions on: socio-economics; HPV knowledge; and women's anticipated adverse psychosocial responses to testing HPV positive (shame, anxiety, stigma and worry). Multivariable linear regression was used to identify socio-economic factors significantly associated with each anticipated adverse reaction. The response rate was 62% (n = 3470). In multivariate analyses, having only attained primary level education were significantly associated with higher mean scores for all four adverse outcomes. Religion was significantly associated with all four adverse outcomes. Age was associated with anxiety and worry; younger women (<30 years) had the highest mean scores. Being married/cohabiting was significantly associated with significantly lower shame and worry scores. Not working was significantly associated with higher mean anxiety and worry scores. Our large population-based survey found significant socio-economic variations in anticipated adverse reactions to testing HPV positive. In order to minimise possible negative impacts on screening uptake and alleviate potential adverse psychological effects of HPV-based screening on women, screening programmes may need to develop specific messages around HPV infection and HPV screening that target certain subgroups of women

Adverse psychological outcomes following colposcopy and related procedures: a systematic review

Background: Although colposcopy is the leading follow-up option for women with abnormal cervical cytology, little is known about its psychological consequences. / Objectives: We performed a systematic review to examine: (1) what, if any, are the adverse psychological outcomes following colposcopy and related procedures; (2) what are the predictors of adverse psychological outcomes post-colposcopy; and (3) what happens to these outcomes over time. / Search strategy: Five electronic databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus) were searched for studies published in English between January 1986 and February 2014. / Selection criteria: Eligible studies assessed psychological wellbeing at one or more time-points post-colposcopy. / Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. Full texts of potentially eligible papers were reviewed. Data were abstracted from, and a quality appraisal performed of, eligible papers. / Main results: Twenty-three papers reporting 16 studies were eligible. Colposcopy and related procedures can lead to adverse psychological outcomes, particularly anxiety. Ten studies investigated predictors of adverse psychological outcomes; management type and treatment had no impact on this. Seven studies investigated temporal trends in psychological outcomes post-colposcopy; findings were mixed, especially in relation to anxiety and distress. Studies were methodologically heterogeneous. / Conclusions: Follow-up investigations and procedures for abnormal cervical cytology can cause adverse psychological outcomes among women. However, little is known about the predictors of these outcomes or how long they persist. There is a need for a more standardised approach to the examination of the psychological impact of colposcopy, especially longer-term outcomes. / Tweetable abstract: Follow-up investigations for abnormal cervical cytology can cause adverse psychological outcome among women

Physical after-effects of colposcopy and related procedures and their inter-relationship with psychological distress: a longitudinal survey

OBJECTIVES: To estimate prevalence of post-colposcopy physical after-effects and investigate associations between these and subsequent psychological distress. DESIGN: Longitudinal survey. SETTING: Two hospital-based colposcopy clinics. POPULATION: Women with abnormal cytology who underwent colposcopy (+/- related procedures). METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to women 4-, 8- and 12-months post-colposcopy. Details of physical after-effects (pain, bleeding and discharge) experienced post-colposcopy were collected at 4-months. Colposcopy-specific distress was measured using the Process Outcome Specific Measure at all time-points. Linear mixed effects regression was used to identify associations between physical after-effects and distress over 12-months, adjusting for socio-demographic and clinical variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of post-colposcopy physical after-effects. Associations between presence of any physical after-effects, awareness of after-effects and number of after-effects and distress. RESULTS: 584 women were recruited (response rate=73%, 59% and 52% at 4, 8 and 12-months, respectively). 82% of women reported one or more physical after-effect(s). Multiple physical after-effects were common (two after-effects=25%; three after-effects=25%). Psychological distress scores declined significantly over time. In adjusted analyses, women who experienced all three physical after-effects had on average a 4.58 (95% CI 1.10 to 8.05) higher distress scored than those who experienced no after-effects. Women who were unaware of the possibility of experiencing after-effects scored significantly higher for distress during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of physical after-effects of colposcopy and related procedures is high. The novel findings of inter-relationships between awareness of the possibility of after-effects, and experiencing multiple after-effects, and post-colposcopy distress may be relevant to the development of interventions to alleviate post-colposcopy distress