4 research outputs found
Il ruolo della Corte di giustizia nella definizione della politica economica e monetaria europea
Il ruolo giocato dalla Corte di giustizia nel campo della politica economica e della
politica monetaria è stato importante quanto sottostimato. Le due competenze dell’Unione
sono profondamente differenti - ciascuna dotata di significative peculiarità - e tuttavia strettamente interconnesse. Definire i confini incerti tra politica economica e politica monetaria
è stato il ruolo più importante svolto dalla Corte in questo campo. Questo ha comportato
una precisazione dei ruoli delle istituzioni chiamate ad agire - Commissione, Consiglio,
Banca centrale - così come dei limiti all’indipendenza dell’istituto di emissione, ma anche
della ripartizione di competenze tra Stati e Unione. Dal 2012, un’ulteriore funzione è stata
esercitata dalla Corte: la verifica della legittimità dell’intervento straordinario della BCE
nell’economia per gestire le crisi. L’assenza nei trattati europei di disposizioni specifiche che
contemplassero un ruolo della Banca come prestatore di ultima istanza o nella gestione delle
crisi economiche e finanziarie spiega bene le contestazioni dell’ultimo decennio, così come la
necessità di pronunce autorevoli da parte della Suprema Corte europea. Queste si collocano
a buon diritto nel solco della giurisprudenza in tema di rule of law e di garanzia del rispetto
dei principi generali nell’ordinamento europeo
The Extraterritorial extension of EU State Aid Rules to the United Kingdom through the Trade and Cooperation Agreement and the Northern Ireland Protocol:A Comparison with the WTO Subsidy System
The relationship between EU State aid control and EU industrial policy. Balancing the internal market in the era of crises
The thesis examines the relationship between EU State aid control and EU industrial policy, by tackling the question of whether the European Commission has been influencing national industrial policies towards valuable objectives of EU industrial policy, particularly the green and digital transitions, through State aid control. The thesis advances the hypothesis that, due to the lack of EU explicit competence on industrial policy, the Commission has been using alternative instruments – among them State aid control – to achieve EU industrial policy indirectly. Article 107(1) TFEU provides for a general ban on State aid, so that Member States cannot advantage national companies vis-à -vis European competitors, unless certain conditions are met under Article 107 (2) and (3) TFEU. Pursuant to Article 5(2) TEU and Articles 3 and 107 TFEU the Commission has exclusive competence in the management of EU State aid control. The thesis adopts a law in context methodology to analyse the evolution of State aid control and EU industrial policy against legal, economic and policy backgrounds. Chapter 1 draws on the economic literature to analyse the concept of industrial policy. The chapter engages with a modern definition of industrial policy which the EU should adopt. Chapter 2 highlights an overarching tension in State aid control. A debate exists on whether State aid policy should be aimed at preventing distortions of competition and negative effects on trade solely, or it should be used as an instrument for growth, e.g., to advance EU industrial policy indirectly. By examining distinctive features of State aid control, the thesis backs the latter assumption. Chapter 3 examined the notion of aid enshrined in Article 107(1) TFEU, particularly State resources, selectivity, and the advantage criterion, suggesting that the Commission might have introduced considerations on the objectives of the measure, for instance on EU industrial policy, instead of assessing national measures only on their effects in the internal market. It is also noted that the Court has often put constitutional constraints by adhering to a textual and constitutional reading of Article 107(1) TFEU. Chapter 4 demonstrates that the Commission has been orienting national policies through the compatibility assessment, especially under Article 107(3) TFEU, thanks to its powers and the use of soft law instruments. The hypothesis of this work – that the Commission has been influencing national industrial policy to achieve EU industrial policy objectives – is analysed in the context of two case studies, research, development and innovation, in Chapter 5, and State aid granted in times of emergency, in Chapter 6. Finally, Chapter 7 reflects on the future of State aid and EU industrial policy, taking account of the international and European fast-changing scenario, due to multiple economic, financial, social and health crises occurred in Europe
Territorial Extension of EU Law through Trade and Investment Agreements
6thJean Monnet Doctoral WorkshopInternational audienc