The impact of colonialism on surgical training structures in Africa Part 1: contextualizing the past, present, and future

Since the first African country attained independence from colonial rule, surgical training on the continent has evolved along 3 principal models. The first is a colonial, local master-apprentice model, the second is a purely local training model, and the third is a collegiate intercountry model. The 3 models exist currently and there are varied perceptions of their relative merits in training competent neurosurgeons. We reviewed the historical development of training and in an accompanying study, seek to describe the complex array of surgical training pathways and explore the neocolonial underpinnings of how these various models of training impact today the development of surgical capacity in Africa. In addition, we sought to better understand how some training systems may contribute to the widely recognized “brain drain” of surgeons from the African continent to high income countries in Europe and North America. To date, there are no published studies evaluating the impact of surgical training systems on skilled workforce emigration out of Africa. This review aims to discover potentially addressable sources of improving healthcare and training equity in this region

The impact of colonialism on surgical training structures in Africa part 2: surveying current and past trainees

Background As a result of gradual independence from colonial rule over the course of the past century, Africa has developed and evolved 3 primary surgical training structures: an extracontinental colonial model, an intracontinental college-based model, and several smaller national or local models. There is consistent evidence of international brain drain of surgical trainees and an unequal continental distribution of surgeons; however there has not, to date, been an evaluation of the impact colonialism on the evolution of surgical training on the continent. This study aims to identify the etiologies and consequences of this segmentation of surgical training in Africa. Methods This is a cross-sectional survey of the experience and perspectives of surgical training by current African trainees and graduates. Results A surgeon\u27s region of residence was found to have a statistically significant positive association with that of a surgeon\u27s training structure (P \u3c0.001). A surgeon\u27s professional college or structure of residency has a significantly positive association with desire to complete subspecialty training (P = 0.008). College and structure of residency also are statistically significantly associated with successful completion of subspecialty training (P \u3c 0.001). Conclusions These findings provide evidence to support the concept that the segmentation of surgical training structures in Africa, which is the direct result of prior colonization, has affected the distribution of trainees and specialists across the continent and the globe. This maldistribution of African surgical trainees directly impacts patient care, as the surgeon–patient ratios in many African countries are insufficient. These inequities should be acknowledged addressed and rectified to ensure that patients in Africa receive timely and appropriate surgical care

The Impact of Colonialism on Surgical Training Structures In Africa Part 2: Surveying Current and Past Trainees.

BACKGROUND: As a result of gradual independence from colonial rule over the course of the past century, Africa has developed and evolved 3 primary surgical training structures: an extracontinental colonial model, an intracontinental college-based model, and several smaller national or local models. There is consistent evidence of international brain drain of surgical trainees and an unequal continental distribution of surgeons; however there has not, to date, been an evaluation of the impact colonialism on the evolution of surgical training on the continent. This study aims to identify the etiologies and consequences of this segmentation of surgical training in Africa. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional survey of the experience and perspectives of surgical training by current African trainees and graduates. RESULTS: A surgeon’s region of residence was found to have a statistically significant positive association with that of a surgeon’s training structure (P CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence to support the concept that the segmentation of surgical training structures in Africa, which is the direct result of prior colonization, has affected the distribution of trainees and specialists across the continent and the globe. This maldistribution of African surgical trainees directly impacts patient care, as the surgeon patient ratios in many African countries are insufficient. These inequities should be acknowledged addressed and rectified to ensure that patients in Africa receive timely and appropriate surgical care

Migration patterns of undergraduate medical students in elective exchanges: a prospective online survey

Background: An international and global medical education programme can help to develop health professionals' skillsets and can be a career-defining factor during the progression from student to practising physician. Our aim is to analyse migration patterns of medical students for elective exchanges and identify intentions for continued migration. Specifically, our objectives were to determine the most popular countries and specialty types that students in the medical and health professions intend to go for elective exchanges; to assess the different factors that contribute to a student's choice to migrate for an elective; and to assess factors leading to the intent of permanent migration after completion of study at the home institution. Methods: Our research deals with experiential learning in a global health setting through analysis of the trends and patterns of medical students pursuing medical electives worldwide. We used a multilingual online questionnaire, completed by students from 15 different countries across a timeframe of 1 month (April 2018). American, European, Asian, and African universities who are part of the Global Educational Exchange in the Medical and Health professions (GEMx) sent an email with the link to the questionnaire to their medical students. The questionnaire was conducted electronically and participants, who were selected via the school's respective student databases, were asked to complete the survey after their electives had been completed. Findings: We analysed responses from 363 students from 15 countries (15 from Kenya; 116 Italy; 20 Nigeria; 16 Rwanda; 5 Ireland; 74 India; 53 Egypt; 47 Indonesia; 11 Mexico; and one response each from Israel, Germany, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Qatar, Algeria, and Canada). Country mean ages ranged between 21 years and 25 years; 224 respondents (61·7%) were women. The most popular destination country for an elective was the USA (72 students from 10 countries). The most popular specialty types were surgery (74, 20·4%) and internal medicine (56, 15·4%). Students cited expanded medical training (26 [42·6%]) an enhanced CV (18 [29·5%]), and broadened research opportunities (5 [8·2%]) as the most important motivations for choosing an elective exchange to another country. Of those who intended permanent migration (101 [27·8%]), the most frequently cited reason for this migration was the expansion of opportunities in a desired specialty (41 [40·6%]) while the main factor deterring students from permanent migration was the desire to disseminate the acquired learning to native home country health-care providers and systems (159, 60·4%). Interpretation: Students' elective experiences abroad not only significant steer the course of their careers as medical professionals, but are also crucial in creating a more holistic educational experience when combined with their home institution's curriculum. Global electives are an initiative that all schools should dedicate resources to pursuing. The elective process is vastly scalable and can be applied at medical schools in all regions of the world. Funding: None

A cross‐sectional survey on surgeon retention in the COSECSA region after specialist training: have things changed?

Background: Increasing surgical specialist workforce density in sub‐Saharan Africa is essential for improving access to surgical care. However, out‐migration creates a significant challenge to attaining provider targets. We aimed to determine the rates and trends of retention of surgeons in the College of Surgeons of East Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA) regions. Methodology: An online, web‐based survey was distributed to COSECSA surgeons who graduated from 2004 to 2020. Current practice and migration patterns were visualized using descriptive analyses and logistic regression models. Results: Response rate was 48% (270/557). Most respondents trained as general surgeons and practiced in Ethiopia, Kenya, Zimbabwe, and Zambia. Majority practiced in public hospitals (74%), and were active in research (81%), teaching (84%) and leadership (55%). Overall country (85%), regional (92%) and Africa retention rates (99%) were high with 100% country retention in Rwanda, Botswana, Lesotho, and Namibia. Tanzania had the lowest retention (61%). Highest inter‐regional migration occurred from East to Southern Africa (26%), and continental out‐migration occurred from Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Kenya. On bivariate analysis, out‐migration from training country and region was associated working with a non‐governmental organization (p = 0.002 and 0.0003) or a specialized hospital (p = 0.046 and 0.011). A multiple regression model with type of institution and leadership was a poor fit (McFadden R2 = 0.055; p = 0.082). Conclusion: Retention rates of surgeons trained by COSECSA in the region remain remarkably high. This can be taken as an indicator of success of the training model to increase surgical workforce density, however, contributory factors need to be qualitatively explored.</p

A cross‐sectional survey on surgeon retention in the COSECSA region after specialist training: have things changed?

Background: Increasing surgical specialist workforce density in sub‐Saharan Africa is essential for improving access to surgical care. However, out‐migration creates a significant challenge to attaining provider targets. We aimed to determine the rates and trends of retention of surgeons in the College of Surgeons of East Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA) regions. Methodology: An online, web‐based survey was distributed to COSECSA surgeons who graduated from 2004 to 2020. Current practice and migration patterns were visualized using descriptive analyses and logistic regression models. Results: Response rate was 48% (270/557). Most respondents trained as general surgeons and practiced in Ethiopia, Kenya, Zimbabwe, and Zambia. Majority practiced in public hospitals (74%), and were active in research (81%), teaching (84%) and leadership (55%). Overall country (85%), regional (92%) and Africa retention rates (99%) were high with 100% country retention in Rwanda, Botswana, Lesotho, and Namibia. Tanzania had the lowest retention (61%). Highest inter‐regional migration occurred from East to Southern Africa (26%), and continental out‐migration occurred from Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Kenya. On bivariate analysis, out‐migration from training country and region was associated working with a non‐governmental organization (p = 0.002 and 0.0003) or a specialized hospital (p = 0.046 and 0.011). A multiple regression model with type of institution and leadership was a poor fit (McFadden R2 = 0.055; p = 0.082). Conclusion: Retention rates of surgeons trained by COSECSA in the region remain remarkably high. This can be taken as an indicator of success of the training model to increase surgical workforce density, however, contributory factors need to be qualitatively explored.</p

Mapping the processes and information flows of a prehospital emergency care system in Rwanda: a process mapping exercise

Objective A vital component of a prehospital emergency care system is getting an injured patient to the right hospital at the right time. Process and information flow mapping are recognised methods to show where efficiencies can be made. We aimed to understand the process and information flows used by the prehospital emergency service in transporting community emergencies in Rwanda in order to identify areas for improvement.Design Two facilitated process/information mapping workshops were conducted. Process maps were produced in real time during discussions and shared with participants for their agreement. They were further validated by field observations.Setting The study took place in two prehospital care settings serving predominantly rural and predominantly urban patients.Participants 24 healthcare professionals from various cadres. Field observations were done on 49 emergencies across both sites.Results Two maps were produced, and four main process stages were described: (1) call triage by the dispatch/call centre team, (2) scene triage by the ambulance team, (3) patient monitoring by the ambulance team on the way to the health facility and (4) handover process at the health facility. The first key finding was that the rural site had multiple points of entry into the system for emergency patients, whereas the urban system had one point of entry (the national emergency number); processes were otherwise similar between sites. The second was that although large amounts of information were collected to inform decision-making about which health facility to transfer patients to, participants found it challenging to articulate the intellectual process by which they used this to make decisions; guidelines were not used for decision-making.Discussion We have identified several areas of the prehospital care processes where there can be efficiencies. To make efficiencies in the decision-making process and produce a standard approach for all patients will require protocolising care pathways