You need a thick skin in this game: Journalists’ attitudes to resilience training as a strategy for combatting online violence

In recent years, resilience training has been recommended as a way to protect news workers from the impact of reporting on traumatic events. However, do journalists see it as a useful tool in dealing with online abuse and harassment? This article explores Australian journalists’ conceptions of resilience training, via a thematic analysis of interviews, and their concerns about its effectiveness in addressing digital violence. The study adopts an ethics of care framework for understanding the uses of resilience training in journalism education for increasing dialogic interaction with audiences. It finds that while some journalists understand resilience training’s relationship to positive mental health, the majority are not clear about its potential and how it might be taught. Our analysis also reveals normative beliefs about journalists’ need to develop ‘a thick skin’ against interpersonal and coordinated violence online. Overall, the article raises questions about how journalists might be better oriented to not only self-care but also collective care

Source and Source Relations

In seeking to understand the construction of news, how journalist-source relationships function is a core concern of journalism studies. These relationships are not necessarily a simple one-way transfer of information but can be a complex interaction that may require understanding of journalism practices, journalism ethics, media law, commerce and the state to elucidate. Normatively, whether identified, anonymous or confidential sources or whistle-blowers, sources can provide journalists with the means to challenge official and elite narratives. This entry details the type and nature of professional relationships between journalists and their personal sources and note the mounting threats to this vital practice. While there are laws to protect journalist’s sources, international organisations note they are at risk of erosion, restriction and compromise - a direct challenge to the universal human rights of freedom of expression and a threat to investigative journalism