81 research outputs found
Factors affecting milk cortisol in mid lactating dairy cows
Background: Whether the measurement of cortisol in dairy cows can be used as a biomarker of adverse
environmental or pathophysiological conditions is still under of scientific debate. In these situations, several systems
mainly the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, the autonomic nervous system, and the immune system are
recruited to reestablish homeostasis. A first aim of the present study was to compare milk and blood cortisol
concentrations and to consider its variability in milk in relation to farm, milk yield and days in milk. A second study
investigates the effects of breed, class of somatic cell count (SCC) and farm on milk cortisol levels in a larger
number of cows and farms, with the aim to validate the results obtained in the pilot study.
Methods: For study 1, 135 cows were sampled from 2 Italian Simmental and 2 Italian Holstein commercial farms,
whilst in the second study, 542 cows were sampled from 6 commercial farms of Italian Simmental and 499 cows
from 4 commercial farms of Italian Holstein.
Results: In study 1, the values of cortisol content in milk were significantly higher in Holstein than Simmental cows.
Significant differences between farms were observed for milk and plasma cortisol concentrations. Cortisol content
in milk was not correlated to plasma content in study 1 and the mean milk to plasma cortisol ratio was about 1:30.
In study 2, for Holstein cows, significantly higher values of milk cortisol in comparison to Simmental cows was
reported. A significant effect of class of SCC was observed, cows belonging to class 3 (SCC higher than 400.000/ml)
showed the highest mean values of milk cortisol. The farm effect was significant also in the study 2, confirming the
results obtained in the first study.
Conclusions: Milk can be considered a preferential site of sampling in dairy cows to point out short term
stimulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Further studies are needed to investigate the physiological
basis of the relationship between milk cortisol content and bree
Integrative policy development for healthier people and ecosystems : a European case analysis
There is growing evidence of the interârelationships between ecosystems and public health. This creates opportunities for the development of crossâsectoral policies and interventions that provide dual benefits to public health and to the natural environment. These benefits are increasingly articulated in strategy documents at national and regional level, yet implementation of integrative policies on the ground remains limited and fragmented. Here, we use a workshop approach to identify some features of this evidenceâimplementation gap based on policy and practice within a number of western European countries. The driving forces behind some recent moves towards more integrative policy development and implementation show important differences between countries, reflecting the nonâlinear and complex nature of the policyâmaking process. We use these case studies to illustrate some of the key barriers to greater integrative policy development identified in the policy analysis literature. Specific barriers we identify include: institutional barriers; differing time perspectives in public health and ecosystem management; contrasting historical development of public health and natural environment disciplinary policy agendas; an incomplete evidence base relating investment in the natural environment to benefits for public health; a lack of appropriate outcome measures including benefitâcost tradeâoffs; and finally a lack of integrative policy frameworks across the health and natural environment sectors. We also identify opportunities for greater policy integration and examples of good practice from different countries. However, we note there is no single mechanism that will deliver integrative policy for healthier people and ecosystems in all countries and situations. National governments, national public agencies, local governments, research institutions, and professional bodies all share a responsibility to identify and seize opportunities for influencing policy change, whether incremental or abrupt, to ensure that ecosystems and the health of society are managed so that the interests of future generations, as well as present generations, can be protected
Potential of legume-based grassland - livestock systems in Europe: a review
European grassland-based livestock production systems face the challenge of producing more meat and milk to meet increasing world demands and to achieve this using fewer resources. Legumes offer great potential for achieving these objectives. They have numerous features that can act together at different stages in the soil-plant-animal-atmosphere system, and these are most effective in mixed swards with a legume proportion of 30-50%. The resulting benefits include reduced dependence on fossil energy and industrial N-fertilizer, lower quantities of harmful emissions to the environment (greenhouse gases and nitrate), lower production costs, higher productivity and increased protein self-sufficiency. Some legume species offer opportunities for improving animal health with less medication, due to the presence of bioactive secondary metabolites. In addition, legumes may offer an adaptation option to rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations and climate change. Legumes generate these benefits at the level of the managed land-area unit and also at the level of the final product unit. However, legumes suffer from some limitations, and suggestions are made for future research to exploit more fully the opportunities that legumes can offer. In conclusion, the development of legume-based grassland-livestock systems undoubtedly constitutes one of the pillars for more sustainable and competitive ruminant production systems, and it can be expected that forage legumes will become more important in the future
Establishing symbiotic nitrogen fixation in cereals and other non-legume crops: The Greener Nitrogen Revolution
Commentary: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the thoracic surgeon: Choose wisely and preserve good judgment
Recommended from our members
An active learning curriculum improves fellowsâ knowledge and faculty teaching skills
Objectives: Traditional didactic lectures are the mainstay of teaching for graduate medical education, although this method may not be the most effective way to transmit information. We created an active learning curriculum for Brigham and Womenâs Hospital (BWH) gastroenterology fellows to maximize learning. We evaluated whether this new curriculum improved perceived knowledge acquisition and knowledge base. In addition, our study assessed whether coaching faculty members in specific methods to enhance active learning improved their perceived teaching and presentation skills. Methods: We compared the Gastroenterology Training Exam (GTE) scores before and after the implementation of this curriculum to assess whether an improved knowledge base was documented. In addition, fellows and faculty members were asked to complete anonymous evaluations regarding their learning and teaching experiences. Results: Fifteen fellows were invited to 12 lectures over a 2-year period. GTE scores improved in the areas of stomach (p0.05). All fellows believed the lectures were helpful, felt more prepared to take the GTE, and preferred the interactive format to traditional didactic lectures. All lecturers agreed that they acquired new teaching skills, improved teaching and presentation skills, and learned new tools that could help them teach better in the future. Conclusion: An active learning curriculum is preferred by GI fellows and may be helpful for improving transmission of information in any specialty in medical education. Individualized faculty coaching sessions demonstrating new ways to transmit information may be important for an individual faculty memberâs teaching excellence
- âŠ