En ERP-studie av sammenhengen mellom personlighet og ubehag : ERP-studie av sammenhengen mellom personlighet og ubehag

Målet med studien var å undersøke om vi fant personlighetsforskjeller i nevrofysiologisk respons på et ubehagelig, somatosensorisk stimuli, målt ved P3-responser. Personlighet ble målt på 400 studenter med Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. 20 deltagere med personlighetskombinasjonen høy nevrotisisme + lav ekstraversjon, samt 18 deltagere med lav nevrotisisme + høy ekstraversjon ble inkludert i forsøket. Kombinasjonen av disse personlighetstrekkene representerer henholdsvis sårbarhet og robusthet mot stress og mestring av livspåkjenninger. Gjennomsnittsamplitude og habituering av P3 som respons på den somatosensoriske stimuleringen ble sammenlignet over de to gruppene. Det var ingen signifikante forskjeller på de to gruppenes P3-responser. Imidlertid var det en signifikant forskjell på P3-respons når deltagerne ble delt etter studiested snarere enn resultat på personlighetstesten. Ulike mulige årsaker til dette diskuteres, deriblant muligheten for at identitet og normer kan påvirke P3. For atferdsmålene egenrapportering av ubehag og mood før og etter forsøket fremkom signifikante gruppeforskjeller og trender i retning av gruppeforskjeller. Den sårbare gruppen rapporterte mer ubehag og fremviste større emosjonell ustabilitet og høyere aktivering enn den robuste gruppen, hvilket er i tråd med tidligere funn. Den uteblitte forskjellen P3-responser kan forklares med at høy ekstraversjon har vært koblet til økte P3-amplituder, slik at nevrotisisme og ekstraversjon kan ha lignet hverandre ut. Det konkluderes med gruppenes opplevde forskjell i ubehag mest sannsynlig har utspring i etterfølgende, bearbeidende kognitive prosesser snarere enn tidlig prosessering målt ved P3, og at P3 som mål på personlighet antagelig påvirkes av ukjente variabler slik at en entydig sammenheng vil være vanskelig å finne

Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in children 15 years and younger in South-Eastern Norway in 2015–16. Implications for prevention and follow-up needs

Objective This retrospective study aimed to describe the volume, severity, and injury mechanism of all hospital-admitted pediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI) at Oslo University Hospital (OUH), emphasizing consequences for prevention and factors indicating a need for follow-up programs. Method Data were extracted from the OUH Trauma registry on 176 children, 0–15 years old, admitted to OUH in 2015 and 2016 with a pTBI diagnosis. The dataset contains demographic data, injury mechanism, type, and severity (Glasgow coma scale, GCS; abbreviated injury scale, AIS; injury severity score, ISS), ICD-10 diagnosis codes, level of treatment, and destination of discharge. Results 79.5% had mild, 9% moderate, and 11.4% severe TBI. The incidence of hospital-treated pTBI in Oslo was 29 per 100,000 per year. The boy: girl ratio was 1.9:1, but in the young teenage group (14–15 years), the ratio was 1:1. Intracranial injury (ICI) identified on CT/MRI was associated with extended hospital stays, with a median of 6 days compared to 1 day for patients without ICI. 27% of the patients assessed as mild TBI at admission had ICI. Children below eight years of age had a higher incidence of moderate and severe ICI from trauma (53% v.s. 28% in children ≥ eight years). Conclusion The injury characteristics of hospital-treated pTBI are in line with other European countries, but we find the boy-girl ratio different as young teenage girls seem to be catching up with the boys. ICI and length of stay should be considered when deciding which patients need follow-up and rehabilitation

Children’s, parents’, and teachers’ experiences of the feasibility of a telerehabilitation intervention for children with acquired brain injury in the chronic phase – a qualitative study of acceptability and participation in the Child In Context Intervention (CICI)

Abstract Background This is a qualitative feasibility study of the Child in Context Intervention (CICI). The CICI is an individualized, goal-oriented and home-based tele-rehabilitation intervention which targets everyday functioning of children (6–16 years) with acquired brain injury in the chronic stage, and their families, one year or more after insult, who have ongoing challenges (physical, cognitive, behavioral, social and/or psychological). The aim of this study is to better understand how children, parents and teachers experienced participation and acceptability; to develop knowledge about the mechanisms of change, and to explore how the CICI was tailored to the context. Methods Six families and schools participated in the intervention, which comprised seven tele-rehabilitation sessions in which the child and parent participated, one in-person parent seminar and four digital school meetings. A multidisciplinary team delivered the intervention to 23 participants over a 4- to 5-month period. The intervention involved psychoeducation about targeted acquired brain injury-related problems, such as fatigue, pain, or social challenges. All but one consented to participate in the current digital interview study. The data were analyzed using content analysis. Results The experience of participation and acceptability varied among the children. Attendance was consistently high; the child participants felt mostly listened to and could influence goal setting and strategies. However, engaging and motivating the child participants proved somewhat challenging. The parents found the CICI rewarding, useful and relevant. However, they had different experiences regarding which intervention component they perceived as most helpful. Some argued in favor of the ‘whole intervention’, while others highlighted new knowledge, SMART goals or the school collaboration. The teachers found the intervention acceptable and useful but wanted a better meeting plan. They had difficulties in finding time for meetings, emphasized the involvement of school leaders, and appreciated the digital format. Conclusions Overall, the intervention was perceived as acceptable, and the participants felt that the various intervention components contributed to improvements. The CICI’s flexibility facilitated tailoring to different contexts based on the children’s functional level. The digital format saved time and provided flexibility regarding the amount of attendance but limited full participation from children with more severe cognitive impairments. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04186182

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Complex Telerehabilitation Intervention for Pediatric Acquired Brain Injury: The Child in Context Intervention (CICI)

The current study is a feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial (RCT): the Child in Context Intervention (CICI). The CICI study is an individualized, goal-oriented and home-based intervention conducted mainly through videoconference. It targets children with ongoing challenges (physical, cognitive, behavioral, social and/or psychological) after acquired brain injury (ABI) and their families at least one year post injury. The CICI feasibility study included six children aged 11–16 years with verified ABI-diagnosis, their families and their schools. The aim was to evaluate the feasibility of the intervention components, child and parent perceptions of usefulness and relevance of the intervention as well as the assessment protocol through a priori defined criteria. Overall, the families and therapists rated the intervention as feasible and acceptable, including the videoconference treatment delivery. However, the burden of assessment was too high. The SMART-goal approach was rated as useful, and goal attainment was high. The parents’ ratings of acceptability of the intervention were somewhat higher than the children’s. In conclusion, the CICI protocol proved feasible and acceptable to families, schools and therapists. The assessment burden was reduced, and adjustments in primary outcomes were made for the definitive RCT

Rehabilitation for children with chronic acquired brain injury in the Child in Context Intervention (CICI) study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background: Pediatric acquired brain injury (pABI) is associated with long-term cognitive, behavioral, social, and emotional problems, which may affect the quality of life, school, and family functioning. Yet, there is a lack of evidence-based community-centered rehabilitation programs for chronic pABI and these children do not systematically receive comprehensive rehabilitation. The Child In Context Intervention (CICI) study is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) for children with chronic pABI, which aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an individualized and goal-oriented intervention targeting everyday functioning of the child and family. Methods: Children aged 6–16 years with MRI/CT-verified intracranial abnormalities will be included in the CICI study if they have persistent self- or parent-reported cognitive, emotional, and/or behavioral challenges 1 year or more after insult and attend school regularly. A total of 70 families will be randomized 1:1 to an intervention or a control group. The intervention consists of seven family sessions, one parent seminar, and four school sessions delivered over approximately 6 months. The parent seminar will be held in person, and the other sessions will mainly be video based. The children’s and families’ self-reported major challenges in everyday life will be targeted using SMART goals. Evidence-based strategies, when available, will be applied to achieve the goals, combined with psychoeducation. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) will be used to evaluate goal attainment. Data is collected at baseline and after approximately 6 and 9 months. External assessors are blinded to group allocation. Primary outcomes are parent-reported brain injury symptoms in children and parenting self-efficacy at 9 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes include child-reported brain injury symptoms, quality of life, executive functioning in daily life, parent emotional symptoms, family functioning, and unmet family health care needs. A process evaluation will be conducted. Discussion: The current study provides an innovative approach to rehabilitation for children in the chronic phase of ABI and their families. This complex intervention may contribute to the development of evidence-based, high-quality rehabilitation for a large patient group, which is underrepresented in clinical research. It may also improve collaboration between specialized rehabilitation facilities, schools, and local health care services. Inclusion for the trial started in April 2021