27 research outputs found

    Balancing B cell responses to the allograft: implications for vaccination

    Get PDF
    Balancing enough immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection and yet maintaining an intact immune system to respond to vaccinations, eliminate invading pathogens or cancer cells is an ongoing challenge to transplant physicians. Antibody mediated allograft rejection remains problematic in kidney transplantation and is the most common cause of graft loss despite current immunosuppressive therapies. The goal of immunosuppressive therapies is to prevent graft rejection; however, they prevent optimal vaccine responses as well. At the center of acute and chronic antibody mediated rejection and vaccine responses is the B lymphocyte. This review will highlight the role of B cells in alloimmune responses including the dependency on T cells for antibody production. We will discuss the need to improve vaccination rates in transplant recipients and present data on B cell populations and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response rates in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

    Mechanism of cellular rejection in transplantation

    Get PDF
    The explosion of new discoveries in the field of immunology has provided new insights into mechanisms that promote an immune response directed against a transplanted organ. Central to the allograft response are T lymphocytes. This review summarizes the current literature on allorecognition, costimulation, memory T cells, T cell migration, and their role in both acute and chronic graft destruction. An in depth understanding of the cellular mechanisms that result in both acute and chronic allograft rejection will provide new strategies and targeted therapeutics capable of inducing long-lasting, allograft-specific tolerance

    Antibody response to 2- and 3-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients

    No full text
    BackgroundAdditional "booster" doses of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have become standard of care for immunosuppressed patients, including kidney transplant recipients (KTR). While these additional doses have been shown to be efficacious in the adult KTR population, there is paucity of data for pediatric and adolescent KTR.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective single-center observational study to determine the proportion of pediatric and adolescent KTR who seroconverted following two- and three-dose regimens of an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine series.ResultsForty-three pediatric and adolescent KTR at our center received at least two doses of an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Seroconversion was noted in 56% of those who received a 2-dose series and increased to 85% in those who received a third dose. In the 16 patients who did not seroconvert after a two-dose series, 12 (75%) seroconverted following the third dose. No serious adverse effects of immunization were noted.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that additional SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses are not only safe and efficacious in pediatric and adolescent KTR, but may be necessary to optimize antibody response. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information

    Rates of idiopathic childhood nephrotic syndrome relapse are lower during the COVID-19 pandemic

    No full text
    BackgroundInfections are thought to be primarily responsible for triggering relapse in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (NS). The COVID-19 pandemic promoted physical distancing, facial mask wearing, and greater attention to infection-prevention measures resulting in decreased transmission of infections. We hypothesized there would also be a decreased rate of NS relapse during this period.MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of children with steroid-sensitive NS. Demographics, rate of relapses, and rate of hospitalizations were collected for a baseline pre-pandemic period (BPP) and for the social distancing period during the pandemic (SDP).ResultsOne hundred twenty-two children with primary steroid-sensitive NS were identified and 109 were followed for the duration of the study period. The paired rate of relapse per subject per year was significantly lower during the SDP (0.6 relapses per subject per year ± 1 SD) compared to the BPP (1.0 relapses per subject per year ± 0.9 SD), P < 0.01. A subgroup of 32 subjects who were newly diagnosed with NS during the BPP similarly had significantly fewer relapses during the SDP (0.8 ± 1 SD) than during the BPP (1.4 ± 1 SD), P = 0.01.ConclusionsOur results support the hypothesis of lower rates of NS relapse and hospitalizations during social distancing for all subjects in our cohort and a subgroup of those newly diagnosed. Lower relapse rates were likely attributable to decreased transmission of infections and greater attention to infection prevention. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information
    corecore