New Tetrahedral Co(II) Complexes of Substituted Thioureas

60-6

Some New Cobalt(III) Complexes of Triazene I-Oxides

368-37

Effects of accommodation training on accommodation and depth of focus in an eye implanted with a crystalens intraocular lens

PURPOSE: To investigate objective measures of the effects of accommodative training of a pseudophakic eye implanted with a Crystalens AT-52SE (eyeonics Inc) intraocular lens (IOL) on reading performance, accommodation, and depth of focus. METHODS: Objective dynamic measures of accommodation, pupil size, and depth of focus were quantified from wavefront measures before and after 1 week of accommodative training that began 29 months after implantation of an accommodating IOL in one patient. Depth of focus was estimated from 50% cut-off of peak performance levels for defocus curves that were computed from the image quality metric VSOTF based on ocular wavefront aberrations. RESULTS: The patient reported improved near vision reading performance after completing the training procedure. After training, there was a shift in conjugate focus in the hyperopic direction, yet the depth of focus increased significantly for near objects. Simulated retinal images and the calculated modulation transfer function of the eye both demonstrated improved quality for near vision after training. CONCLUSIONS: The subjective report of improved near vision after training was correlated with improvement of objective measures. Depth of focus increased for near objects with attempts to accommodate after training. This change was linked to increases in aberrations and pupil size and occurred despite the conjugate focus shifting in the hyperopic direction. These results demonstrate that accommodative training may be useful in improving near vision in patients with accommodating IOLs. Copyright © SLACK Incorporated

International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA). Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus. The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated. This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy

International consensus statement on obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND: Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea is needed to consolidate and summarize key factors important for clinical management of the OSA adult patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA). METHODS: Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus. RESULTS: The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA and treatment on the multiple comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated. CONCLUSION: This review of the literature in OSA consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence. This effort aims to highlight the basis of OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and opportunities for improvement include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy