A combined regimen of cyproterone acetate and testosterone enanthate as a potentially highly effective male contraceptive

In this study we tested the effectiveness of the combined administration of cyproterone acetate (CPA) and testosterone enanthate (TE) in suppressing spermatogenesis. After a control phase of 3 months, 15 normal men were randomized to receive TE (100 mg/week) plus CPA at a dose of 100 mg/day (CPA-100; n = 5) or 50 mg/day (CPA-50; n = 5) or TE (100 mg/week) alone (n = 5) for 16 weeks. Semen analysis was performed every 2 weeks. Every 4 weeks, fasting blood samples were drawn for the measurement of LH, FSH, testosterone, estradiol, and biochemical and hematological parameters; subjects underwent a physical examination; and they and their partners filled in a sexual and behavioral questionnaire. Regardless of the dose, each of the 10 subjects receiving CPA plus TE became azoospermic, whereas only 3 of 5 subjects treated with TE alone achieved azoospermia. Times to azoospermia were 6.8 +/- 0.5, 8.4 +/- 1.0, and 14.0 +/- 1.2 weeks in groups CPA-100, CPA-50, and TE alone, respectively (P = NS). Throughout treatment, both gonadotropins tended to be higher in the TE alone group than in the other groups. This difference was mostly due to the higher gonadotropin levels present in the 2 men treated with TE alone that remained oligospermic. No difference in testosterone or estradiol levels was found among the groups. No significant change in lipoprotein levels or liver function tests could be detected. In the CPA-100 and CPA-50 groups, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and red blood cells were lower at the end of the treatment phase, whereas no change was detected in TE alone group. A tendency for a decrease in body weight was detected in subjects treated with CPA, whereas there was no change in subjects receiving TE alone. At the end of the treatment phase, a decrease in testis size was present in all groups. There was no significant change in sexual function, aggressive behavior, mood states, or satisfaction with relationship in any group. These results suggest that the combined administration of CPA and TE is very effective in suppressing spermatogenesis and may represent a promising regimen for reversible contraception in males

A survey of clinical features of allergic rhinitis in adults

Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) has high prevalence and substantial socio-economic burden.Material/Methods: The study included 35 Italian Centers recruiting an overall number of 3383 adult patients with rhinitis (48% males, 52% females, mean age 29.1, range 18-45 years). For each patient, the attending physician had to fill in a standardized questionnaire, covering, in particular, some issues such as the ARIA classification of allergic rhinitis (AR), the results of skin prick test (SPT), the kind of treatment, the response to treatment, and the satisfaction with treatment.Results: Out of the 3383 patients with rhinitis, 2788 (82.4%) had AR: 311 (11.5%) had a mild intermittent, 229 (8.8%) a mild persistent, 636 (23.5%) a moderate-severe intermittent, and 1518 (56.1%) a moderate-severe persistent form. The most frequently used drugs were oral antihistamines (77.1%) and topical corticosteroids (60.8%). The response to treatment was judged as excellent in 12.2%, good in 41.3%, fair in 31.2%, poor in 14.5%, and very bad in 0.8% of subjects. The rate of treatment dissatisfaction was significantly higher in patients with moderate-to-severe AR than in patients with mild AR (p<0.0001). Indication to allergen immunotherapy (AIT) was significantly more frequent (p<0.01) in patients with severe AR than with mild AR.Conclusions: These findings confirm the appropriateness of ARIA guidelines in classifying the AR patients and the association of severe symptoms with unsuccessful drug treatment. The optimal targeting of patients to be treated with AIT needs to be reassessed

Factors influencing the prescription of allergen immunotherapy: The Allergen Immunotherapy Decision Analysis (AIDA) study

The evidence of efficacy of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) for respiratory allergy has been demonstrated by a number of meta-analyses. However, the daily practice of AIT is quite different from controlled trials, facing challenges in terms of selection of patients, practical performance, and, of particular importance, use of allergen extracts of inadequate quality. We here performed a survey, named the Allergen Immunotherapy Decision Analysis (AIDA), to evaluate which criteria are used by specialists to choose a product for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with respiratory allergy. A questionnaire composed of 14 items to be ranked by each participant according to the importance attributed when choosing SLIT products was submitted to 444 Italian specialists. The responses of the 169 (38.1%) physicians, who answered all questions, were analysed. Most of the respondents were allergists (79%), followed by pulmonologists (10.8%), both allergists and pulmonologists (4.8%), and otorhinolaryngologists (3%); 59.8% of the respondents were males and 40.2% were females. The age distribution showed that 89.9% of the respondents were aged between 35 and 64 years. All respondents usually prescribed AIT products in their clinical practice: 31.4% used only SLIT, whereas 69.2% used both subcutaneous and sublingual administration. The rankings, expressed as means, attributed by physicians for each of the 14 items were as follows: level of evidence-based medicine (EBM) validation of efficacy (3.44), level of EBM validation of safety (4.30), standardization of the product (5.37), efficacy based on personal experience (5.82), defined content(s) of the major allergen(s) in micrograms (5.96), scientific evidence for each single allergen (6.17), safety based on personal experience (6.32), ease of administration protocol (8.08), cost and terms of payment (e.g. instalments) (9.17), dose personalization (9.24), patient preference (9.25), ease of product storage (9.93), reimbursement (10.12), and availability of a helpline or on-line assistance from the manufacturer (11.89). These attitudes need to be taken into consideration by regulatory agencies as well as by producers