Family Experiences with Care for Children with Inherited Metabolic Diseases in Canada: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Background and Objective: Children with inherited metabolic diseases often require complex and highly specialized care. Patient and family-centered care can improve health outcomes that are important to families. This study aimed to examine experiences of family caregivers (parents/guardians) of children diagnosed with inherited metabolic diseases with healthcare to inform strategies to improve those experiences. Methods: A cross-sectional mailed survey was conducted of family caregivers recruited from an ongoing cohort study. Participants rated their healthcare experiences during their child’s visits to five types of healthcare settings common for inherited metabolic diseases: the metabolic clinic, the emergency department, hospital inpatient units, the blood laboratory, and the pharmacy. Participants provided narrative descriptions of any memorable negative or positive experiences. Results: There were 248 respondents (response rate 49%). Caregivers were generally very or somewhat satisfied with the care provided at each care setting. Appropriate treatment, provider knowledge, provider communication, and care coordination were deemed essential aspects of satisfaction with care by the majority of participants across many settings. Memorable negative experiences were reported by 8–22% of participants, varying by setting. Among participants who reported memorable negative experiences, contributing factors included providers’ demeanor, lack of communication, lack of involvement of the family, and disregard of an emergency protocol letter provided by the family. Conclusions: While caregivers’ satisfaction with care for children with inherited metabolic diseases was high, we identified gaps in family-centered care and factors contributing to negative experiences that are important to consider in the future development of strategies to improve pediatric care for inherited metabolic diseases

Severe cystic degeneration and intractable seizures in a newborn with molybdenum cofactor deficiency type B

Newborns with cystic degeneration with or without intractable seizures should be investigated for inborn errors of metabolism, including molybdenum cofactor deficiency (MoCoD). MoCoD may present with non-specific hypoxic ischemic injury in the neonatal period with MRI showing extensive prenatally acquired cystic encephalomalacia involving grey and white matter. Most newborns with MoCoD will present with normal head size and brain appearance at birth and postnatally rapidly develop cystic encephalomalacia. A significant minority will present with signs of prenatal brain injury or malformation. It is important to consider the diagnosis in both scenarios. Low plasma urate and homocysteine may help direct the diagnostic evaluation. Herein, we describe the clinical, radiological and biochemical features of a newborn with MoCoD that was initially suspected of having the condition on biochemical screening and confirmed on rapid whole exome sequencing. Keywords: Molybdenum cofactor deficiency, Cystic, Brain MRI, Inborn errors of metabolis

Phenotype, biochemical features, genotype and treatment outcome of pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy

We report treatment outcome of eleven patients with pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy caused by pathogenic variants in ALDH7A1 (PDE-ALDH7A1). We developed a clinical severity score to compare phenotype with biochemical features, genotype and delays in the initiation of pyridoxine. Clinical severity score included 1) global developmental delay/ intellectual disability; 2) age of seizure onset prior to pyridoxine; 3) current seizures on treatment. Phenotype scored 1-3 = mild; 4-6 = moderate; and 7-9 = severe. Five patients had mild, four patients had moderate, and two patients had severe phenotype. Phenotype ranged from mild to severe in eight patients (no lysine-restricted diet in the infantile period) with more than 10-fold elevated urine or plasma α-AASA levels. Phenotype ranged from mild to moderate in patients with homozygous truncating variants and from moderate to severe in patients with homozygous missense variants. There was no correlation between severity of the phenotype and the degree of α-AASA elevation in urine or genotype. All patients were on pyridoxine, nine patients were on arginine and five patients were on the lysine-restricted diet. 73% of the patients became seizure free on pyridoxine. 25% of the patients had a mild phenotype on pyridoxine monotherapy. Whereas, 100% of the patients, on the lysine-restricted diet initiated within their first 7 months of life, had a mild phenotype. Early initiation of lysine-restricted diet and/or arginine therapy likely improved neurodevelopmental outcome in young patients with PDE-ALDH7A1

Intrathecal idursulfase-IT in patients with neuronopathic mucopolysaccharidosis II: Results from a phase 2/3 randomized study.

Two-thirds of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis II (MPS II; Hunter syndrome) have cognitive impairment. This phase 2/3, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter study (NCT02055118) investigated the effects of intrathecally administered idursulfase-IT on cognitive function in patients with MPS II. Children older than 3 years with MPS II and mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment (assessed by Differential Ability Scales-II [DAS-II], General Conceptual Ability [GCA] score) who had tolerated intravenous idursulfase for at least 4 months were randomly assigned (2:1) to monthly idursulfase-IT 10 mg (n = 34) via an intrathecal drug delivery device (IDDD; or by lumbar puncture) or no idursulfase-IT treatment (n = 15) for 52 weeks. All patients continued to receive weekly intravenous idursulfase 0.5 mg/kg as standard of care. Of 49 randomized patients, 47 completed the study (two patients receiving idursulfase-IT discontinued). The primary endpoint (change from baseline in DAS-II GCA score at week 52 in a linear mixed-effects model for repeated measures analysis) was not met: although there was a smaller decrease in DAS-II GCA scores with idursulfase-IT than with no idursulfase-IT at week 52, this was not significant (least-squares mean treatment difference [95% confidence interval], 3.0 [-7.3, 13.3]; p = 0.5669). Changes from baseline in Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scales-II Adaptive Behavior Composite scores at week 52 (key secondary endpoint) were similar in the idursulfase-IT (n = 31) and no idursulfase-IT (n = 14) groups. There were trends towards a potential positive effect of idursulfase-IT across DAS-II composite, cluster, and subtest scores, notably in patients younger than 6 years at baseline. In a post hoc analysis, there was a significant (p = 0.0174), clinically meaningful difference in change from baseline in DAS-II GCA scores at week 52 with idursulfase-IT (n = 13) versus no idursulfase-IT (n = 6) among those younger than 6 years with missense iduronate-2-sulfatase gene variants. Overall, idursulfase-IT reduced cerebrospinal glycosaminoglycan levels from baseline by 72.0% at week 52. Idursulfase-IT was generally well tolerated. These data suggest potential benefits of idursulfase-IT in the treatment of cognitive impairment in some patients with neuronopathic MPS II. After many years of extensive review and regulatory discussions, the data were found to be insufficient to meet the evidentiary standard to support regulatory filings

Long-term open-label extension study of the safety and efficacy of intrathecal idursulfase-IT in patients with neuronopathic mucopolysaccharidosis II.

Enzyme replacement therapy with weekly infused intravenous (IV) idursulfase is effective in treating somatic symptoms of mucopolysaccharidosis II (MPS II; Hunter syndrome). A formulation of idursulfase for intrathecal administration (idursulfase-IT) is under investigation for the treatment of neuronopathic MPS II. Here, we report 36-month data from the open-label extension (NCT02412787) of a phase 2/3, randomized, controlled study (HGT-HIT-094; NCT02055118) that assessed the safety and efficacy of monthly idursulfase-IT 10 mg in addition to weekly IV idursulfase on cognitive function in children older than 3 years with MPS II and mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment. Participants were also enrolled in this extension from a linked non-randomized sub-study of children younger than 3 years at the start of idursulfase-IT therapy. The extension safety population comprised 56 patients who received idursulfase-IT 10 mg once a month (or age-adjusted dose for sub-study patients) plus IV idursulfase (0.5 mg/kg) once a week. Idursulfase-IT was generally well tolerated over the cumulative treatment period of up to 36 months. Overall, 25.0% of patients had at least one adverse event (AE) related to idursulfase-IT; most treatment-emergent AEs were mild in severity. Of serious AEs (reported by 76.8% patients), none were considered related to idursulfase-IT treatment. There were no deaths or discontinuations owing to AEs. Secondary efficacy analyses (in patients younger than 6 years at phase 2/3 study baseline; n = 40) indicated a trend for improved Differential Ability Scale-II (DAS-II) General Conceptual Ability (GCA) scores in the early idursulfase-IT versus delayed idursulfase-IT group (treatment difference over 36 months from phase 2/3 study baseline: least-squares mean, 6.8 [90% confidence interval: -2.1, 15.8; p = 0.2064]). Post hoc analyses of DAS-II GCA scores by genotype revealed a clinically meaningful treatment effect in patients younger than 6 years with missense variants of the iduronate-2-sulfatase gene (IDS) (least-squares mean [standard error] treatment difference over 36 months, 12.3 [7.24]). These long-term data further suggest the benefits of idursulfase-IT in the treatment of neurocognitive dysfunction in some patients with MPS II. After many years of extensive review and regulatory discussions, the data were found to be insufficient to meet the evidentiary standard to support regulatory filings

Establishing a core outcome set for mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) in children: study protocol for a rapid literature review, candidate outcomes survey, and Delphi surveys

Abstract Background Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a group of inherited metabolic diseases characterized by chronic, progressive multi-system manifestations with varying degrees of severity. Disease-modifying therapies exist to treat some types of MPS; however, they are not curative, underscoring the need to identify and evaluate co-interventions that optimize functioning, participation in preferred activities, and quality of life. A Canadian pediatric MPS registry is under development and may serve as a platform to launch randomized controlled trials to evaluate such interventions. To promote the standardized collection of patient/family-reported and clinical outcomes considered important to patients/families, health care providers (HCPs), and policymakers, the choice of outcomes to include in the registry will be informed by a core outcome set (COS). We aim to establish a patient-oriented COS for pediatric MPS using a multi-stakeholder approach. Methods In step 1 of the six-step process to develop the COS, we will identify relevant outcomes through a rapid literature review and candidate outcomes survey. A two-phase screening approach will be implemented to identify eligible publications, followed by extraction of outcomes and other pre-specified data elements. Simultaneously, we will conduct a candidate outcomes survey with children with MPS and their families to identify outcomes most important to them. In step 2, HCPs experienced in treating patients with MPS will be invited to review the list of outcomes generated in step 1 and identify additional clinically relevant outcomes. We will then ask patients/families, HCPs, and policymakers to rate the outcomes in a set of Delphi Surveys (step 3), and to participate in a subsequent consensus meeting to finalize the COS (step 4). Step 5 involves establishing a set of outcome measurement instruments for the COS. Finally, we will disseminate the COS to knowledge users (step 6). Discussion The proposed COS will inform the choice of outcomes to include in the MPS registry and, more broadly, promote the standardized collection of patient-oriented outcomes for pediatric MPS research. By involving patients/families from the earliest stage of the research, we will ensure that the COS will be relevant to those who will ultimately benefit from the research. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42021267531 , COME

Evaluation of the quality of clinical data collection for a pan-Canadian cohort of children affected by inherited metabolic diseases : lessons learned from the Canadian Inherited Metabolic Diseases Research Network

Background The Canadian Inherited Metabolic Diseases Research Network (CIMDRN) is a pan-Canadian practice-based research network of 14 Hereditary Metabolic Disease Treatment Centres and over 50 investigators. CIMDRN aims to develop evidence to improve health outcomes for children with inherited metabolic diseases (IMD). We describe the development of our clinical data collection platform, discuss our data quality management plan, and present the findings to date from our data quality assessment, highlighting key lessons that can serve as a resource for future clinical research initiatives relating to rare diseases. Methods At participating centres, children born from 2006 to 2015 who were diagnosed with one of 31 targeted IMD were eligible to participate in CIMDRN’s clinical research stream. For all participants, we collected a minimum data set that includes information about demographics and diagnosis. For children with five prioritized IMD, we collected longitudinal data including interventions, clinical outcomes, and indicators of disease management. The data quality management plan included: design of user-friendly and intuitive clinical data collection forms; validation measures at point of data entry, designed to minimize data entry errors; regular communications with each CIMDRN site; and routine review of aggregate data. Results As of June 2019, CIMDRN has enrolled 798 participants of whom 764 (96%) have complete minimum data set information. Results from our data quality assessment revealed that potential data quality issues were related to interpretation of definitions of some variables, participants who transferred care across institutions, and the organization of information within the patient charts (e.g., neuropsychological test results). Little information was missing regarding disease ascertainment and diagnosis (e.g., ascertainment method – 0% missing). Discussion Using several data quality management strategies, we have established a comprehensive clinical database that provides information about care and outcomes for Canadian children affected by IMD. We describe quality issues and lessons for consideration in future clinical research initiatives for rare diseases, including accurately accommodating different clinic workflows and balancing comprehensiveness of data collection with available resources. Integrating data collection within clinical care, leveraging electronic medical records, and implementing core outcome sets will be essential for achieving sustainability.Other UBCReviewedFacultyResearche