Long-Term Use of Aldosterone-Receptor Antagonists in Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Retrospective Analysis

Background. The long-term efficacy of aldosterone-receptor antagonists (ARAs) as add-on treatment in uncontrolled hypertension has not yet been reported. Methods. Data from 123 patients (21 with primary aldosteronism, 102 with essential hypertension) with difficult-to-treat hypertension who received an ARA between May 2005 and September 2009 were analyzed retrospectively for their blood pressure (BP) and biochemical response at first followup after start with ARA and the last follow-up available. Results. Systolic BP decreased by 22 ± 20 and diastolic BP by 9.4 ± 12 mmHg after a median treatment duration of 25 months. In patients that received treatment >5 years, SBP was 33 ± 20 and DBP was 16 ± 13 mmHg lower than at baseline. Multivariate analysis revealed that baseline BP and follow-up duration were positively correlated with BP response. Conclusion. Add-on ARA treatment in difficult-to-treat hypertension results in a profound and sustained BP reduction

Finapres tracking of systolic pressure and baroreflex sensitivity improved by waveform filtering

Objective. Arterial pressure waveforms distort between brachial and finger arteries, causing differences mainly in systolic pressure. Distortion, reportedly, can be removed by applying a waveform filter to the finger pressure. Design. We analysed the data from two studies that detected discrepancies in systolic tracking between Finapres and brachial pressures. The first set comprised waveforms of seven volunteers during incremental bicycle exercise to exhaustion and the second set comprised waveforms of eight volunteers during increasing phenylephrine infusion. Methods. We applied the filter and compared 1 min averaged unfiltered and waveform-filtered finger and brachial pressures. Results. During exercise, finger systolic pressure overestimated brachial increasingly, from 7 (SD 10) mmHg at rest to 27 (17) mmHg at maximal exertion. Differences were reduced by waveform filtering from 3 (SD 9) mmHg at rest to 1 (SD 15) mmHg at maximal exertion. During phenylephrine infusion finger systolic pressure overestimated brachial pressure, but the magnitude of the overestimate decreased from 14(SD 15) mmHg at baseline to -1 (SD 16) mmHg at maximal rate. After waveform filtering over-estimation was an almost constant 6 (SD 11) mmHg. Median baroreflex sensitivities from brachial, unfiltered and waveform-filtered finger pressure were 5.8, 7.5 and 5.3 ms/mmHg and correlation increased after filtering. The results indicate improved systolic pressure tracking after waveform filtering. Conclusions. Finger pressure distortion follows a general pattern correctable by waveform filtering. Waveform filtering allows a 'brachial' view to be obtained from Finapres data

High-dose statin monotherapy versus low-dose statin/ezetimibe combination on fasting and postprandial lipids and endothelial function in obese patients with the metabolic syndrome: The PANACEA study

Low-dose statin therapy in combination with ezetimibe, an inhibitor of intestinal cholesterol absorption, lowers plasma LDL-cholesterol levels to a similar degree as high-dose statin monotherapy. This study assessed whether similar LDL-cholesterol lowering with simvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy improves fasting and postprandial arterial endothelial function compared to high-dose statin therapy alone. Multicenter, double-blind, crossover trial in 100 abdominally obese patients with the metabolic syndrome, randomized to 6 weeks' treatment with simvastatin 80 mg or simvastatin/ezetimibe 10/10 mg. Flow mediated dilatation (FMD) and peripheral arterial tonometry (EndoPAT) as well as plasma lipids were measured in the fasting state and after an oral lipid load at baseline and after both treatments. Fasting LDL-cholesterol levels (3.57 mmol/L at baseline) were reduced to 1.79 mmol/L following treatment with simvastatin 80 mg and 1.81 mmol/L with simvastatin/ezetimibe 10/10 mg, respectively. Plasma lipids were similar at 4 h after an oral lipid load following both treatments for 6 weeks. Fasting endothelial function was also similar with both treatments when assessed by FMD (adjusted mean ± SE: 4.35 ± 0.19 vs. 4.43 ± 0.18; P = 0.777) and EndoPAT (2.12 ± 0.05 vs 2.20 ± 0.05; P = 0.304). After an oral fat load, changes in endothelial function were also comparable for both treatments as assessed by FMD (-0.34 ± 0.21 vs. -0.43 ± 0.20; P = 0.766) and EndoPAT (0.00 ± 0.07 vs. -0.04 ± 0.08; P = 0.712). Treatment with simvastatin/ezetimibe 10/10 mg induced no difference in endothelial function in the fasting and postprandial state compared to simvastatin 80 mg while attaining similar LDL-c levels in obese patients with metabolic syndrom

Der Andenpakt

Der Andenpakt. - In: Politisches Lexikon Lateinamerika / hrsg. von Peter Waldmann. - 2., neubearb. Aufl. - München : Beck, 1982. - S. 364-367. - (Beck´sche Schwarze Reihe ; 221) [1. Aufl. 1980

Achieved LDL cholesterol levels in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: A model that explores the efficacy of conventional and novel lipid-lowering therapy

Background: A large proportion of patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH) do not reach low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels advocated by international guidelines (<70 mg/dL or <100 mg/dL). Objective: We set out to model which proportion of patients reach targets using conventional and novel therapies. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis in a large cohort of genetically identified heFH patients and calculated the proportion reaching treatment targets in four scenarios: (1) after 50% LDL-c reduction (representing maximal dose statin); (2) after 70% LDL-c reduction (maximal dose statin + ezetimibe); (3) additional 40% LDL-c reduction representing cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor (CETPi); and (4) 60% LDL-c reduction (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors [PCSK9i]), on top of scenario 2. We applied 100% adherence rates and literature-based adherence rates from 62% to 80%. Results: We included 1,059 heFH patients with and 9,420 heFH patients without coronary heart disease (CHD). With maximal dose statin, 8.3% and 48.1% of patients with and without CHD would reach their recommended LDL-c targets, respectively. This increases to 54.3% and 93.2% when ezetimibe is added. Addition of CETPi increases these numbers to 95.7% and 99.7%, whereas adding PCSK9i would result in 99.8% and 100% goal attainment. Using literature-based adherence rates, these numbers decrease to 3.8% and 27.3% for maximal dose statin, 5.8% and 38.9% combined with ezetimibe, 31.4% and 81.2% when adding CETPi, and 40.3% and 87.1% for addition of PCSK9i. Conclusions: Less than 10% with and 50% of heFH patients without CHD would reach treatment targets with maximal dose statin, but this substantially increases on addition of ezetimibe, CETPi, or PCSK9i. However, considering recently published adherence data, this might be lower in real life, especially in heFH patients with CHD