The 5′ untranslated region of Apaf-1 mRNA directs translation under apoptosis conditions via a 5′ end-dependent scanning mechanism

AbstractWe have previously shown that translation driven by the 5′ UTR of Apaf-1 mRNA is relatively efficient in the absence of m7G-cap, but no IRES is involved. Nevertheless, it may be speculated that a “silent” IRES is activated under apoptosis conditions. Here, we show that translation of the mRNA with the Apaf-1 5′ UTR is relatively resistant to apoptosis induced by etoposide when eIF4E is sequestered by 4E-BP and eIF4G is partially cleaved. However, translation under these conditions remains governed by 5′ end-dependent scanning. We hypothesize that the observed phenomenon is based on the intrinsic low cap-dependence of the Apaf-1 5′ UTR

Glycyl-tRNA synthetase specifically binds to the poliovirus IRES to activate translation initiation

Adaptation to the host cell environment to efficiently take-over the host cell's machinery is crucial in particular for small RNA viruses like picornaviruses that come with only small RNA genomes and replicate exclusively in the cytosol. Their Internal Ribosome Entry Site (IRES) elements are specific RNA structures that facilitate the 5′ end-independent internal initiation of translation both under normal conditions and when the cap-dependent host protein synthesis is shut-down in infected cells. A longstanding issue is which host factors play a major role in this internal initiation. Here, we show that the functionally most important domain V of the poliovirus IRES uses tRNAGly anticodon stem–loop mimicry to recruit glycyl-tRNA synthetase (GARS) to the apical part of domain V, adjacent to the binding site of the key initiation factor eIF4G. The binding of GARS promotes the accommodation of the initiation region of the IRES in the mRNA binding site of the ribosome, thereby greatly enhancing the activity of the IRES at the step of the 48S initiation complex formation. Moonlighting functions of GARS that may be additionally needed for other events of the virus–host cell interaction are discussed

Differential contribution of the m7G-cap to the 5′ end-dependent translation initiation of mammalian mRNAs

Many mammalian mRNAs possess long 5′ UTRs with numerous stem-loop structures. For some of them, the presence of Internal Ribosome Entry Sites (IRESes) was suggested to explain their significant activity, especially when cap-dependent translation is compromised. To test this hypothesis, we have compared the translation initiation efficiencies of some cellular 5′ UTRs reported to have IRES-activity with those lacking IRES-elements in RNA-transfected cells and cell-free systems. Unlike viral IRESes, the tested 5′ UTRs with so-called ‘cellular IRESes’ demonstrate only background activities when placed in the intercistronic position of dicistronic RNAs. In contrast, they are very active in the monocistronic context and the cap is indispensable for their activities. Surprisingly, in cultured cells or cytoplasmic extracts both the level of stimulation with the cap and the overall translation activity do not correlate with the cumulative energy of the secondary structure of the tested 5′ UTRs. The cap positive effect is still observed under profound inhibition of translation with eIF4E-BP1 but its magnitude varies for individual 5′ UTRs irrespective of the cumulative energy of their secondary structures. Thus, it is not mandatory to invoke the IRES hypothesis, at least for some mRNAs, to explain their preferential translation when eIF4E is partially inactivated

Eukaryotic translation initiation machinery can operate in a bacterial-like mode without eIF2. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

Unlike bacteria, a specialized eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)-2, in the form of the ternary complex eIF2-GTP-Met-tRNA i Met , is used to deliver the initiator tRNA to the ribosome in all eukaryotic cells. Here we show that the hepatitis C virus (HCV) internal ribosome entry site (IRES) can direct translation without eIF2 and its GTPase-activating protein eIF5. In addition to the general eIF2-and eIF5-dependent pathway of 80S complex assembly, the HCV IRES makes use of a bacterial-like pathway requiring as initiation factors only eIF5B (an analog of bacterial IF2) and eIF3. The switch from the conventional eukaryotic mode of translation initiation to the eIF2-independent mechanism occurs when eIF2 is inactivated by phosphorylation under stress conditions. The bacterial translation initiation mechanism uses only three initiation factors: IF1, IF2 and IF3 (ref. 1). In recent years, their functional analogs have been identified in eukaryotic cells; namely, eIF1A, eIF5B and eIF1, respectively 2 . In spite of this similarity, the molecular mechanisms of translation initiation in bacteria and eukaryotes are believed to be significantly different. The principal distinctive feature of eukaryotic translation is the scanning of the mRNA 5¢ untranslated regions (5¢ UTRs) 3 . The initial recognition of the mRNA occurs through the interaction between the 5¢ terminal m 7 G cap and the cap binding complex eIF4F. The ribosome is loaded onto the 5¢ end of the mRNA and is then thought to migrate downstream (to 'scan') to locate an AUG codon in a favorable context. The factors eIF1 and eIF1A are indispensable for scanning. The helicase activity of eIF4F, stimulated by eIF4B, unwinds secondary structures within the mRNA during scanning. Another distinctive feature is the presence of eIF2, which, in the form of the ternary complex eIF2-GTP-Met-tRNA i Met , brings the initiator tRNA to the ribosome 3 . There is no analog of eIF2 in bacteria. The role of eIF2 is broader than just delivering MettRNA i Met to the ribosome, as phosphorylation of eIF2 is known to be central to the global regulation of protein synthesis under stress conditions and during virus infection 4 . This complicated machinery operates not only in the case of standard cap-dependent mRNAs but also with mRNAs whose translation initiation uses the binding of ribosomes to IRESs. These structural elements bind diverse components of the translation initiation apparatus and thereby direct ribosome binding to the vicinity of the initiation codon. Although most of the well-studied IRESs from picornaviruses do not require the cap binding factor eIF4E, their molecular mechanisms of initiation are no simpler than that for standard cap-dependent mRNAs, and they frequently require additional mRNA binding proteins 5 . The only exception, among IRES elements using methionine-based translation initiation, are the IRES elements of HCV RNA and the HCV-like IRESs from some other flavi-and picornaviruses. They bind directly to the 40S ribosomal subunit and position it close to the AUG codon so that no scanning is required, and this strongly resembles the prokaryotic mode of AUG selection. Consequently, the cap binding complex eIF4F and the scanning factors eIF1 and eIF1A are not required. For this type of IRES element, the 48S translation initiation complex can be formed with just eIF2-GTP-Met-tRNA i Met (refs. 6,7). It was intriguing to know whether the unique features of the HCV IRES are also involved in the formation of the final 80S initiation complex. Here we have explored the mechanism of 80S complex formation on the HCV IRES using totally purified components of the translational apparatus from mammalian cells. We have found that, in addition to the conventional eIF2-dependent mode of translation initiation, the HCV IRES can use a bacterial-like, eIF2-independent mechanism. In this case, it is apparently eIF5B, the homolog of prokaryotic IF2 (ref. 8), that promotes initiator tRNA binding to the ribosomal P site. Inactivation of eIF2 by phosphorylation, in response to various treatments, has a much smaller effect on HCV IRES-mediated translation than on cap-dependent translation. The switch from the eukaryotic to a bacterial-like mode of translation initiation occurs when eIF2 is inactivated. RESULTS 80S complex can be formed on the HCV IRES without eIF2 Previous work showed that the 48S initiation complex can be formed on the HCV IRES with 40S subunits and the eIF2-GTP-Met-tRNA i Met complex only. The factors eIF1 and eIF4 were dispensable 6 . The role of eIF3 remained unclear; it was suggested to be involved in the next step of initiation. As eIF2 was the crucial component for 48S comple

In vitro activity of human translation initiation factor eIF4B is not affected by phosphomimetic amino acid substitutions S422D and S422E.

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4B is necessary for ribosomal scanning through structured mRNA leaders. In higher eukaryotes, eIF4B serves as a downstream effector of several signaling pathways. In response to mitogenic stimuli, eIF4B undergoes multiple phosphorylations which are thought to regulate its activity. Recently, Ser422 was identified as a predominant site for human eIF4B phosphorylation via several signaling pathways, and phosphomimetic amino acid substitutions S422D or S422E were shown to activate eIF4B in living cells. However, stimulatory role of these modifications has never been analyzed directly. Here, using both mammalian reconstituted translation initiation assay and complete cell-free translation system, we perform a comparison of recombinant eIF4B derivatives with the wild type recombinant protein, and do not find any difference in their activities. On the contrary, native eIF4B purified from HeLa cells reveals significantly higher activity in both assays. Thus, the effects of S422D and S422E substitutions on eIF4B activity in living cells observed previously either require some other protein modification(s), or may only be manifested in an intact cell. Our study raises the question on whether the phosphorylation of Ser422 is sufficient for eIF4B activation observed upon mitogenic stimulation

Assembly of 48S Translation Initiation Complexes from Purified Components with mRNAs That Have Some Base Pairing within Their 5′ Untranslated Regions

The reconstitution of translation initiation complexes from purified components is a reliable approach to determine the complete set of essential canonical initiation factors and auxiliary proteins required for the 40S ribosomal subunit to locate the initiation codon on individual mRNAs. Until now, it has been successful mostly for formation of 48S translation initiation complexes with viral IRES elements. Among cap-dependent mRNAs, only globin mRNAs and transcripts with artificial 5′ leaders were amenable to this assembly. Here, with modified conditions for the reconstitution, 48S complexes have been successfully assembled with the 5′ UTR of beta-actin mRNA (84 nucleotides) and the tripartite leader of adenovirus RNAs (232 nucleotides), though the latter has been able to use only the scanning rather then the shunting model of translation initiation with canonical initiation factors. We show that initiation factor 4B is essential for mRNAs that have even a rather moderate base pairing within their 5′ UTRs (with the cumulative stability of the secondary structure within the entire 5′ UTR < −13 kcal/mol) and not essential for beta-globin mRNA. A recombinant eIF4B poorly substitutes for the native factor. The 5′ UTRs with base-paired G residues reveal a very sharp dependence on the eIF4B concentration to form the 48S complex. The data suggest that even small variations in concentration or activity of eIF4B in mammalian cells may differentially affect the translation of different classes of cap-dependent cellular mRNAs

A Leaderless mRNA Can Bind to Mammalian 80S Ribosomes and Direct Polypeptide Synthesis in the Absence of Translation Initiation Factors

Translation initiation in eukaryotic cells is known to be a complex multistep process which involves numerous protein factors. Here we demonstrate that leaderless mRNAs with initiator Met-tRNA can bind directly to 80S mammalian ribosomes in the absence of initiation factors and that the complexes thus formed are fully competent for the subsequent steps of polypeptide synthesis. We show that the canonical 48S pathway of eukaryotic translation initiation has no obvious advantage over the 80S pathway of translation initiation on leaderless mRNAs and suggest that, in the presence of competing mRNAs containing a leader, the latter mechanism will be preferred. The direct binding of the leaderless mRNA to the 80S ribosome was precluded when such an mRNA was supplied with a 5′ leader, irrespective of whether it was in a totally single-stranded conformation or was prone to base pairing. The striking similarity between the mechanisms of binding of leaderless mRNAs with mammalian 80S or bacterial 70S ribosomes gives support to the idea that the alternative mode of translation initiation used by leaderless mRNAs represents a relic from early steps in the evolution of the translation apparatus

A Cross-Kingdom Internal Ribosome Entry Site Reveals a Simplified Mode of Internal Ribosome Entry

Rhopalosiphum padi virus (RhPV) is an insect virus of the Dicistroviridae family. Recently, the 579-nucleotide-long 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of RhPV has been shown to contain an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) that functions efficiently in mammalian, plant, and insect in vitro translation systems. Here, the mechanism of action of the RhPV IRES has been characterized by reconstitution of mammalian 48S initiation complexes on the IRES from purified components combined with the toeprint assay. There is an absolute requirement for the initiation factors eIF2 and eIF3 and the scanning factor eIF1 to form 48S complexes on the IRES. In addition, eIF1A, eIF4F (or the C-terminal fragment of eIF4G), and eIF4A strongly stimulated the assembly of this complex, whereas eIF4B had no effect. Although the eIF4-dependent pathway is dominant in the RhPV IRES-directed cell-free translation, omission of either eIF4G or eIF4A or both still allowed the assembly of 48S complexes from purified components with ∼23% of maximum efficiency. Deletions of up to 100 nucleotides throughout the 5′-UTR sequence produced at most a marginal effect on the IRES activity, suggesting the absence of specific binding sites for initiation factors. Only deletion of the U-rich unstructured 380-nucleotide region proximal to the initiation codon resulted in a complete loss of the IRES activity. We suggest that the single-stranded nature of the RhPV IRES accounts for its strong but less selective potential to bind key mRNA recruiting components of the translation initiation apparatus from diverse origins

Efficient Translation Initiation Directed by the 900-Nucleotide-Long and GC-Rich 5′ Untranslated Region of the Human Retrotransposon LINE-1 mRNA Is Strictly Cap Dependent Rather than Internal Ribosome Entry Site Mediated▿

Retrotransposon L1 is a mobile genetic element of the LINE family that is extremely widespread in the mammalian genome. It encodes a dicistronic mRNA, which is exceptionally rare among eukaryotic cellular mRNAs. The extremely long and GC-rich L1 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) directs synthesis of numerous copies of RNA-binding protein ORF1p per mRNA. One could suggest that the 5′UTR of L1 mRNA contained a powerful internal ribosome entry site (IRES) element. Using transfection of cultured cells with the polyadenylated monocistronic (L1 5′UTR-Fluc) or bicistronic (Rluc-L1 5′UTR-Fluc) RNA constructs, capped or uncapped, it has been firmly established that the 5′UTR of L1 does not contain an IRES. Uncapping reduces the initiation activity of the L1 5′UTR to that of background. Moreover, the translation is inhibited by upstream AUG codons in the 5′UTR. Nevertheless, this cap-dependent initiation activity of the L1 5′UTR was unexpectedly high and resembles that of the beta-actin 5′UTR (84 nucleotides long). Strikingly, the deletion of up to 80% of the nucleotide sequence of the L1 5′UTR, with most of its stem loops, does not significantly change its translation initiation efficiency. These data can modify current ideas on mechanisms used by 40S ribosomal subunits to cope with complex 5′UTRs and call into question the conception that every long GC-rich 5′UTR working with a high efficiency has to contain an IRES. Our data also demonstrate that the ORF2 translation initiation is not directed by internal initiation, either. It is very inefficient and presumably based on a reinitiation event