14 research outputs found
Vrijednosti pojedinih dijagnostiÄkih metoda u otkrivanju patoloÅ”kih promjena u dojci
For diagnosing pathologic changes in the breast, depending on age, clinical examination combined with ultrasound, mammography and cytology are most commonly used. Any positive finding requires a biopsy for a final diagnosis. The biopsy precedes surgical treatment usually performed during the same operative session. To assess the value of some diagnostic methods for detection of pathologic breast changes a retrospective study was carried out on a sample of 78 patients diagnosed and treated at the Eljuga Polyclinic from March 1999 to March 2003. In diagnosing for pathohistologic changes, the aforementioned methods were applied in all of the 78 studied patients (aged 23-77). The patients were assigned to two age groups including patients over 35 (mean age 49) and under 35 yrs of age (mean age 29), respectively. The first group was further divided into 6 subgroups, depending on the correlation between a particular diagnostic method and final pathohistologic finding. The correspondence between pathohistologic finding and all other diagnostic procedures was as follows: clinical examination, US, mammography and cytological analysis showed accuracy in 92.30% (72/78), 96.15% (75/78), 92.53% (62/67, excluding 11 patients <35 yrs not requiring mammography ā benign changes), and 84.62 % (64/73, technically failed samples excluded) of the cases, respectively. Ultrasound breast imaging demonstrated superior accuracy over mammography, clinical examination and cytologic puncture. The results lead to the conclusion that in the majority of breast patients, a combination of several diagnostic methods should be used to get an accurate diagnosis.U dijagnosticiranju patoloÅ”kih promjena u dojci, ovisno o dobi, najÄeÅ”Äe se primjenjuju kliniÄki i ultrazvuÄni pregled, mamografija i citoloÅ”ka analiza. Pozitivan nalaz bilo koje od tih metoda pretrage indicira biopsiju kao konaÄnu dijagnostiÄku metodu. Ona prethodi kirurÅ”kom lijeÄenju i najÄeÅ”Äe se vrÅ”i u istom aktu s operacijom. U svrhu procjene vrijednosti pojedinih dijagnostiÄkih metoda u otkrivanju patoloÅ”kih promjena u dojci, provedena je retrospektivna studija na uzorku od 78 bolesnica, podvrgnutih dijagnosticiranju i lijeÄenju promjena u dojci u Poliklinici "Eljuga" u razdoblju izmeÄu ožujka 1999. i ožujka 2003. U svih 78 bolesnica (u dobi izmeÄu 23 i 77 godina) u postupku dijagnosticiranja patoloÅ”kih promjena u dojci primjenjivane su sve navedene dijagnostiÄke metode. Bolesnice su podijeljene u dvije dobne skupine: one starije od 35g. (prosjeÄne dobi od 49 godina) i one mlaÄe od 35g. (prosjeÄne dobi od 29 godina). Prva skupina bolesnica podijeljena je u daljnjih 6 podskupina, ovisno o korelaciji izmeÄu pojedinih dijagnostiÄkih metoda i konaÄnog patohistoloÅ”kog nalaza. Podudarnost patohistoloÅ”kog nalaza i svih drugih dijagnostiÄkih postupaka bila je sljedeÄa: kliniÄki pregled pokazao se toÄnim u 92,30 % ( 72/78 ) bolesnica, UZV u 96,15 % ( 75/78 ), mamografija u 92,53 % ( 62/ 67, izuzeto 11 bolesnica <35 god. kojima nije bila potrebna mamografija-benigne promjene), a citoloÅ”ka analiza u 84,62 % bolesnica ( 64/73, s izuzetkom tehniÄki neuspjelih uzoraka). NajtoÄnijom metodom pokazao se UZV pregled dojki, kojeg slijede mamografija, kliniÄki pregled, te citoloÅ”ka punkcija. Rezultati nameÄu zakljuÄak, da kod veÄine bolesnica samo kombinacija viÅ”e dijagnostiÄkih metoda može dovesti do ispravne dijagnoze
Vrijednosti pojedinih dijagnostiÄkih metoda u otkrivanju patoloÅ”kih promjena u dojci
For diagnosing pathologic changes in the breast, depending on age, clinical examination combined with ultrasound, mammography and cytology are most commonly used. Any positive finding requires a biopsy for a final diagnosis. The biopsy precedes surgical treatment usually performed during the same operative session. To assess the value of some diagnostic methods for detection of pathologic breast changes a retrospective study was carried out on a sample of 78 patients diagnosed and treated at the Eljuga Polyclinic from March 1999 to March 2003. In diagnosing for pathohistologic changes, the aforementioned methods were applied in all of the 78 studied patients (aged 23-77). The patients were assigned to two age groups including patients over 35 (mean age 49) and under 35 yrs of age (mean age 29), respectively. The first group was further divided into 6 subgroups, depending on the correlation between a particular diagnostic method and final pathohistologic finding. The correspondence between pathohistologic finding and all other diagnostic procedures was as follows: clinical examination, US, mammography and cytological analysis showed accuracy in 92.30% (72/78), 96.15% (75/78), 92.53% (62/67, excluding 11 patients <35 yrs not requiring mammography ā benign changes), and 84.62 % (64/73, technically failed samples excluded) of the cases, respectively. Ultrasound breast imaging demonstrated superior accuracy over mammography, clinical examination and cytologic puncture. The results lead to the conclusion that in the majority of breast patients, a combination of several diagnostic methods should be used to get an accurate diagnosis.U dijagnosticiranju patoloÅ”kih promjena u dojci, ovisno o dobi, najÄeÅ”Äe se primjenjuju kliniÄki i ultrazvuÄni pregled, mamografija i citoloÅ”ka analiza. Pozitivan nalaz bilo koje od tih metoda pretrage indicira biopsiju kao konaÄnu dijagnostiÄku metodu. Ona prethodi kirurÅ”kom lijeÄenju i najÄeÅ”Äe se vrÅ”i u istom aktu s operacijom. U svrhu procjene vrijednosti pojedinih dijagnostiÄkih metoda u otkrivanju patoloÅ”kih promjena u dojci, provedena je retrospektivna studija na uzorku od 78 bolesnica, podvrgnutih dijagnosticiranju i lijeÄenju promjena u dojci u Poliklinici "Eljuga" u razdoblju izmeÄu ožujka 1999. i ožujka 2003. U svih 78 bolesnica (u dobi izmeÄu 23 i 77 godina) u postupku dijagnosticiranja patoloÅ”kih promjena u dojci primjenjivane su sve navedene dijagnostiÄke metode. Bolesnice su podijeljene u dvije dobne skupine: one starije od 35g. (prosjeÄne dobi od 49 godina) i one mlaÄe od 35g. (prosjeÄne dobi od 29 godina). Prva skupina bolesnica podijeljena je u daljnjih 6 podskupina, ovisno o korelaciji izmeÄu pojedinih dijagnostiÄkih metoda i konaÄnog patohistoloÅ”kog nalaza. Podudarnost patohistoloÅ”kog nalaza i svih drugih dijagnostiÄkih postupaka bila je sljedeÄa: kliniÄki pregled pokazao se toÄnim u 92,30 % ( 72/78 ) bolesnica, UZV u 96,15 % ( 75/78 ), mamografija u 92,53 % ( 62/ 67, izuzeto 11 bolesnica <35 god. kojima nije bila potrebna mamografija-benigne promjene), a citoloÅ”ka analiza u 84,62 % bolesnica ( 64/73, s izuzetkom tehniÄki neuspjelih uzoraka). NajtoÄnijom metodom pokazao se UZV pregled dojki, kojeg slijede mamografija, kliniÄki pregled, te citoloÅ”ka punkcija. Rezultati nameÄu zakljuÄak, da kod veÄine bolesnica samo kombinacija viÅ”e dijagnostiÄkih metoda može dovesti do ispravne dijagnoze
Važnost rekonstrukcijske kirurgije kod bolesnica s rakom dojke
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in Croatia. Thanks to modern diagnostics and national program of early detection of breast cancer, tumors today are diagnosed in earlier stage, which has favorable effect on the prognosis of disease, but also on the possibilities of surgical treatment. Surgical treatment of breast cancer is progressing rapidly, from breast conserving surgical procedures to skin sparing mastectomies and primary reconstruction of removed breast which became the standard of modern surgical treatment. Apart from the primary reconstruction, patients are offered the opportunity of secondary reconstruction. In patients with early breast cancer (T1 and T2 stage), skin sparing mastectomy followed with breast reconstruction is a safe method from oncologic viewpoint and from the aspect of patient, it reduces psychological trauma that is associated with removal of the entire breast (feeling of mutilation, depression, decreased sexuality). This method also gives plastic surgeons ability to achieve excellent aesthetic appearance of new breast.Rak dojke najÄeÅ”Äi je rak u žena u Hrvatskoj. ZahvaljujuÄi suvremenoj dijagnostici i nacionalnom probiru u moguÄnosti smo otkrivati rak dojke u ranijoj fazi. Važnost rane dijagnostike povoljno utjeÄe ne samo na prognozu bolesti, veÄ i na moguÄnost odabira optimalnog kirurÅ”kog zahvata s kojim i poÄinje lijeÄenje u žena s rakom dojke. Od kirurÅ”kih zahvata u obzir dolaze poÅ”tedni zahvati na dojci, od mastektomije s poÅ”tedom kože i primarnom rekonstrukcijom do sekundarnih rekonstrukcija. U svih bolesnica s T1 i T2 tumorom, mastektomija s poÅ”tedom kože i primarnom rekonstrukcijom kirurÅ”ki je postupak koji nudi jednaku onkoloÅ”ku sigurnost kao i standardna mastektomija, a nakon primarne rekonstrukcije u bolesnica se umanjuje psiholoÅ”ka trauma, koje tim zahvatom ne gube osjeÄaj ženstvenosti. ženama se takoÄer vraÄa povjerenje u vlastito tijelo, a samim time i odnos prema partneru te drugima u zajednici
Važnost ranog otkrivanja raka dojke u oÄuvanju psihiÄkog i tjelesnog integriteta žene
Breast cancer remains a major public health problem in the entire developed world. The first and the biggest reason is an ever increasing number of breast cancer diagnoses and consistently high mortality from this disease. Due to the continuous improvement of standard methods and introduction of new diagnostic tests breast cancer can be detected at an early stage, when a high percentage of cases are likely to be successfully treated and/or cured. One of many different types of surgery is usually the first step in treating breast cancer. Each in their own way affects womanās quality of life. Efforts should be made to detect breast cancer as early as possible to entirely avoid some of the treatment modalities and thus significantly improve womanās quality of life in all its aspects.Rak dojke i dalje ostaje velik javnozdravstveni problem u cijelom razvijenom svijetu. Prvi i najveÄi razlog svakako je sve veÄi broj oboljelih žena i konstantno visoka smrtnost od ove bolesti. ZahvaljujuÄi stalnom usavrÅ”avanju standardnih te uvo|enju novih dijagnostiÄkih metoda rak dojke moguÄe je otkriti u najranijoj fazi kada je bolest u visokom postotku uspjeÅ”no lijeÄiva i/ili izljeÄiva. Prvi korak u lijeÄenju raka dojke najÄeÅ”Äe je jedan od viÅ”e tipova operativnih zahvata. Svaki od njih na svoj naÄin utjeÄe na kvalitetu života žene. Rak dojke treba nastojati Å”to ranije otkriti kako bi se neki od modaliteta lijeÄenja u cijelosti izbjegli Å”to znaÄajno podiže kvalitetu života žene u svim njegovim aspektima
Važnost ranog otkrivanja raka dojke u oÄuvanju psihiÄkog i tjelesnog integriteta žene
Breast cancer remains a major public health problem in the entire developed world. The first and the biggest reason is an ever increasing number of breast cancer diagnoses and consistently high mortality from this disease. Due to the continuous improvement of standard methods and introduction of new diagnostic tests breast cancer can be detected at an early stage, when a high percentage of cases are likely to be successfully treated and/or cured. One of many different types of surgery is usually the first step in treating breast cancer. Each in their own way affects womanās quality of life. Efforts should be made to detect breast cancer as early as possible to entirely avoid some of the treatment modalities and thus significantly improve womanās quality of life in all its aspects.Rak dojke i dalje ostaje velik javnozdravstveni problem u cijelom razvijenom svijetu. Prvi i najveÄi razlog svakako je sve veÄi broj oboljelih žena i konstantno visoka smrtnost od ove bolesti. ZahvaljujuÄi stalnom usavrÅ”avanju standardnih te uvo|enju novih dijagnostiÄkih metoda rak dojke moguÄe je otkriti u najranijoj fazi kada je bolest u visokom postotku uspjeÅ”no lijeÄiva i/ili izljeÄiva. Prvi korak u lijeÄenju raka dojke najÄeÅ”Äe je jedan od viÅ”e tipova operativnih zahvata. Svaki od njih na svoj naÄin utjeÄe na kvalitetu života žene. Rak dojke treba nastojati Å”to ranije otkriti kako bi se neki od modaliteta lijeÄenja u cijelosti izbjegli Å”to znaÄajno podiže kvalitetu života žene u svim njegovim aspektima
Važnost rekonstrukcijske kirurgije kod bolesnica s rakom dojke
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in Croatia. Thanks to modern diagnostics and national program of early detection of breast cancer, tumors today are diagnosed in earlier stage, which has favorable effect on the prognosis of disease, but also on the possibilities of surgical treatment. Surgical treatment of breast cancer is progressing rapidly, from breast conserving surgical procedures to skin sparing mastectomies and primary reconstruction of removed breast which became the standard of modern surgical treatment. Apart from the primary reconstruction, patients are offered the opportunity of secondary reconstruction. In patients with early breast cancer (T1 and T2 stage), skin sparing mastectomy followed with breast reconstruction is a safe method from oncologic viewpoint and from the aspect of patient, it reduces psychological trauma that is associated with removal of the entire breast (feeling of mutilation, depression, decreased sexuality). This method also gives plastic surgeons ability to achieve excellent aesthetic appearance of new breast.Rak dojke najÄeÅ”Äi je rak u žena u Hrvatskoj. ZahvaljujuÄi suvremenoj dijagnostici i nacionalnom probiru u moguÄnosti smo otkrivati rak dojke u ranijoj fazi. Važnost rane dijagnostike povoljno utjeÄe ne samo na prognozu bolesti, veÄ i na moguÄnost odabira optimalnog kirurÅ”kog zahvata s kojim i poÄinje lijeÄenje u žena s rakom dojke. Od kirurÅ”kih zahvata u obzir dolaze poÅ”tedni zahvati na dojci, od mastektomije s poÅ”tedom kože i primarnom rekonstrukcijom do sekundarnih rekonstrukcija. U svih bolesnica s T1 i T2 tumorom, mastektomija s poÅ”tedom kože i primarnom rekonstrukcijom kirurÅ”ki je postupak koji nudi jednaku onkoloÅ”ku sigurnost kao i standardna mastektomija, a nakon primarne rekonstrukcije u bolesnica se umanjuje psiholoÅ”ka trauma, koje tim zahvatom ne gube osjeÄaj ženstvenosti. ženama se takoÄer vraÄa povjerenje u vlastito tijelo, a samim time i odnos prema partneru te drugima u zajednici
Polymorphisms in survivin (BIRC5 gene) are associated with age of onset in breast cancer patients
Survivin, encoded by BIRC5 gene (baculoviral IAP repeat containing 5), belongs to the family of inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs). In mammalian cells it participates in the control of mitosis, apoptosis regulation, and cellular stress response. Its expression is increased in almost all types of cancers. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of BIRC5 polymorphisms in breast cancer (BC) and to connect survivin expression with various clinicopathological characteristics of BC patients. Blood and archival tumour tissue samples were collected from 26 BC patients from Croatia. Survivin expression was determined immunohistochemically. BIRC5 promoter, coding region, and 3āUTR were genotyped. DNA from 74 healthy women was used as control. BIRC5 polymorphisms and survivin expression were tested against age of onset, histological grade, tumour type and size, lymph node status, oestrogen, progesterone, Her2, and Ki67 status. Numbers of samples with weak, moderate, and strong survivin expression were 9 (33.3%), 11 (40.7%), and 7 (25.9%), respectively. Most patients had nuclear survivin staining (92.6%). High survivin expression was significantly associated with negative oestrogen receptor status (p=0.007) and positive Ki67 expression (p=0.032). Ki67 expression was also positively correlated with histological grade (p=0.0009). Fourteen polymorphisms were found in BC samples, located mostly in promoter and 3āUTR of BIRC5. There was no significant difference in the distribution of polymorphisms between BC and control samples. Among clinicopathological characteristics of BC patients, alleles of five BIRC5 polymorphisms were associated with younger age of onset: c.-644T>C (55.8 years [y] vs. 48.1 y ; p=0.006), c.-241C>T (54.2 y vs. 45.0 ; p=0.029), c.9809T>C (55.8 y vs. 48.1 y ; p=0.006), c.-1547C>T (58.3 y vs. 50.9 y ; p=0.011), and c.9386T>C (50.8 y vs. 59.5 y ; p=0.004). To assess the significance of BIRC5 polymorphisms and survivin expression as predictive and prognostic biomarkers for BC further research with a larger sample size is needed
GUIDELINES FOR GENETIC COUNSELLING AND TESTING FOR HEREDITARY BREAST AND OVARIAN CANCER
Tijekom posljednjih desetljeÄa svjedoci smo velikog napretka u izvedivosti i kliniÄkoj iskoristivosti genetiÄkog testiranja kod nasljednih karcinoma. Nasljedni karcinomi dojke i jajnika najÄeÅ”Äe su posljedica mutacija u genima BRCA1 i BRCA2. Ovim smjernicama obuhvatili smo kriterije za upuÄivanje pacijenata na genetiÄko savjetovanje i testiranje; kriterije za upuÄivanje zdravih pojedinaca na prediktivno testiranje ako nije moguÄe testiranje oboljelog Älana obitelji; postupak genetiÄkog savjetovanja prije i nakon testiranja; nalaz testiranja, kategorije nalaza i razine rizika; preporuke za daljnje praÄenje osoba s poviÅ”enim rizikom; kemoprevenciju i profilaktiÄku kirurgiju kod nositelja/-ica patogenih mutacija gena BRCA 1 i BRCA 2; oÄuvanje reproduktivne funkcije u žena oboljelih od raka dojke i nositeljica mutacija BRCA i pristanak informiranog bolesnika na genetiÄko testiranje. Smjernice su namijenjene svim specijalistima koji su na bilo koji naÄin ukljuÄeni u zbrinjavanje oboljelih od nasljednih karcinoma dojke i jajnika, a sastavila ih je radna skupina prema podacima iz relevantne medicinske literature te kliniÄkim iskustvima Älanova radne skupine.The last few decades have witnessed a great progress in feasibility and clinical utilization of genetic testing for hereditary cancers. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancers are most often the result of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations. In these guidelines we have covered: the criteria for referral of patients to genetic counselling and testing; the criteria for referral of healthy family members to predictive testing in the event when there is no possibility of testing the patient; the process of genetic counselling before and after testing; test results, their categories and risk levels; recommendations for monitoring of individuals with an increased risk; chemoprevention and prophylactic surgery for carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations; preservation of reproductive function in women with breast cancer and in carriers of BRCA mutations; and informed consent for genetic testing. The guidelines are intended for all specialists who are in any way involved in the care of patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, and are compiled by the working group according to the data from the relevant medical literature and from clinical experience of the members of the working group
GUIDELINES FOR GENETIC COUNSELLING AND TESTING FOR HEREDITARY BREAST AND OVARIAN CANCER
Tijekom posljednjih desetljeÄa svjedoci smo velikog napretka u izvedivosti i kliniÄkoj iskoristivosti genetiÄkog testiranja kod nasljednih karcinoma. Nasljedni karcinomi dojke i jajnika najÄeÅ”Äe su posljedica mutacija u genima BRCA1 i BRCA2. Ovim smjernicama obuhvatili smo kriterije za upuÄivanje pacijenata na genetiÄko savjetovanje i testiranje; kriterije za upuÄivanje zdravih pojedinaca na prediktivno testiranje ako nije moguÄe testiranje oboljelog Älana obitelji; postupak genetiÄkog savjetovanja prije i nakon testiranja; nalaz testiranja, kategorije nalaza i razine rizika; preporuke za daljnje praÄenje osoba s poviÅ”enim rizikom; kemoprevenciju i profilaktiÄku kirurgiju kod nositelja/-ica patogenih mutacija gena BRCA 1 i BRCA 2; oÄuvanje reproduktivne funkcije u žena oboljelih od raka dojke i nositeljica mutacija BRCA i pristanak informiranog bolesnika na genetiÄko testiranje. Smjernice su namijenjene svim specijalistima koji su na bilo koji naÄin ukljuÄeni u zbrinjavanje oboljelih od nasljednih karcinoma dojke i jajnika, a sastavila ih je radna skupina prema podacima iz relevantne medicinske literature te kliniÄkim iskustvima Älanova radne skupine.The last few decades have witnessed a great progress in feasibility and clinical utilization of genetic testing for hereditary cancers. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancers are most often the result of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations. In these guidelines we have covered: the criteria for referral of patients to genetic counselling and testing; the criteria for referral of healthy family members to predictive testing in the event when there is no possibility of testing the patient; the process of genetic counselling before and after testing; test results, their categories and risk levels; recommendations for monitoring of individuals with an increased risk; chemoprevention and prophylactic surgery for carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations; preservation of reproductive function in women with breast cancer and in carriers of BRCA mutations; and informed consent for genetic testing. The guidelines are intended for all specialists who are in any way involved in the care of patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, and are compiled by the working group according to the data from the relevant medical literature and from clinical experience of the members of the working group
Smjernice za genetiÄko savjetovanje i testiranje na nasljedni rak dojke i jajnika [Guidelines for genetic counselling and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer]
The last few decades have witnessed a great progress in feasibility and clinical utilization of genetic testing for hereditary cancers. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancers are most often the result of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations. In these guidelines we have covered: the criteria for referral of patients to genetic counselling and testing; the criteria for referral of healthy family members to predictive testing in the event when there is no possibility of testing the patient; the process of genetic counselling before and after testing; test results, their categories and risk levels; recommendations for monitoring of individuals with an increased risk; chemoprevention and prophylactic surgery for carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations; preservation of reproductive function in women with breast cancer and in carriers of BRCA mutations; and informed consent for genetic testing. The guidelines are intended for all specialists who are in any way involved in the care of patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, and are compiled by the working group according to the data from the relevant medical literature and from clinical experience of the members of the working group