Relevance of the Nutritional Care in Patients before Liver Transplantation

Aim: To define the body composition of patients awaiting liver transplantation and analyze the effect of the nutritional counseling.Methods: This retrospective study involved 335 patients in screening for liver transplantation. The evaluation of the nutritional status at the first access to the Center comprised: anthropometrical evaluations and Mini Nutritional Assessment. For cases that reached transplantation (N. 110), evaluated two times, the second control comprised also the Subjective Global Assessment.Results: The Body Max Index at the first observation showed a prevalence of overweight or obesity while the Mini Nutritional Assessment and anthropometric evaluation showed that a large number of patients were at risk of malnutrition or bad nourished with a decrease of fat and/or of muscular mass. Immediately before transplantation and after a nutritional follow up with a personalized diet fat mass has been normalized in 91% and muscular mass remained stable in 56% of cases.Conclusions: Malnutrition is largely diffused in patients undergoing liver transplantation. An evaluation by simple methods such as anthropometry and nutritional counseling is needed to ameliorate their conditions. Particular attention must be paid to counteract the decrease of fat mass and muscular mass in females. Â

Prevention of hepatitis C recurrence by bridging sofosbuvir/ribavirin from pre- to post-liver transplant: A real-life strategy

Background & Aims: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) re-infection following liver transplant (LT) is associated with reduced graft and patient survival. Before transplant, Sofosbuvir/Ribavirin (SOF/R) treatment prevents recurrent HCV in 96% of those patients achieving viral suppression for at least 4 weeks before transplant. We evaluated whether a bridging SOF-regimen from pre- to post-transplant is safe and effective to prevent HCV recurrence in those patients with less than 4 weeks of HCV-RNA undetectability at the time of transplant. Methods: From July 2014 SOF/R was given in 233 waitlisted HCV cirrhotics with/without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within an Italian Compassionate Program. One hundred patients were transplanted and 31 patients (31%) treated with SOF/R bridging therapy were studied. Results: Liver transplant indication in bridge subgroup was HCC in 22 and decompensated cirrhosis in 9. HCV-genotype was 1/4 in 18 patients. SOF 400 mg/day and R (median dosage 800 mg/day) were given for a median of 35 days before LT. At transplant time, 19 patients were still HCV-RNA positive (median HCV-RNA 58 IU/mL). One recipient had a virological breakthrough at week 4 post-transplant; one died, on treatment, 1-month post-transplant for sepsis and 29/31 achieved a 12-week sustained virological response (94%). Acute cellular rejection occurred in three recipients. On September 2016, 30 recipients (97%) were alive with a median follow-up of 18 months (range 13-25). Conclusions: In patients with suboptimal virological response at LT, a bridging SOF/R regimen helps avoiding post-transplant graft reinfection

The Italian compassionate use of sofosbuvir in HCV patients waitlisted for liver transplantation: A national real-life experience

Background & Aims: This study aimed to assess the real-life clinical and virological outcomes of HCV waitlisted patients for liver transplantation (LT) who received sofosbuvir/ribavirin (SOF/R) within the Italian compassionate use program. Methods: Clinical and virological data were collected in 224 patients with decompensated cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving daily SOF/R until LT or up a maximum of 48 weeks. Results: Of 100 transplanted patients, 51 were HCV-RNA negative for >4 weeks before LT (SVR12: 88%) and 49 negative for <4 weeks or still viraemic at transplant: 34 patients continued treatment after LT (bridging therapy) (SVR12: 88%), while 15 stopped treatment (SVR12: 53%). 98 patients completed SOF/R without LT (SVR12: 73%). In patients with advanced decompensated cirrhosis (basal MELD 6515 and/or C-P 65B8), a marked improvement of the scores occurred in about 50% of cases and almost 20% of decompensated patients without HCC reached a condition suitable for inactivation and delisting. Conclusions: These real-life data indicate that in waitlisted patients: (i) bridging antiviral therapy can be an option for patients still viraemic or negative <4 weeks at LT; and (ii) clinical improvement to a condition suitable for delisting can occur even in patients with advanced decompensated cirrhosis

Prevalent use of combined prophylaxis of hepatitis B after liver transplantation in Italy: results of a national survey in a large cohort

Prophylaxis of hepatitis B after liver transplantation with antiviral(s) and immunoglobulins efficiently protect the majority of recipients; however recent experiences suggest a decline of HBsAg-positive candidates and the use of hepatitis B Immunoglobulin-free schedules

Prevalent use of Combined Prophylaxis of Hepatitis B after liver transplantation in Italy: Results of a national survey in a large cohort

BACKGROUND: Prophylaxis of hepatitis B after liver transplantation with antiviral(s) and immunoglobulins efficiently protect the majority of recipients; however recent experiences suggest a decline of HBsag-positive candidates and the use of hepatitis B immunoglobulin-free schedules. MetHoDs: this national survey evaluated the epidemiology and clinical results of hepatitis B prophylaxis among 10,365 liver transplants performed in 25 years in 13 italian centers. RESULTSː With a percentage of 22, 2260 procedures were performed in HBsAg-positive recipients and 714 out of 1080 anti-HBc-positive grafts were used in HBsag-negative recipients; a total of 2974 patients (29%) were considered at risk of hepatitis B after liver transplantation. similar rates (18% of HBsag-positive candidates and 15% of anti-HBc-positive grafts) were registered in the last collected year. combined prophylaxis with Hepatitis B immunoglobulins remained prevalent among centers and was effective in 96% of HBsag-positive recipients and in 94% of HBsag-negative recipi-ents of anti-HBc-positive grafts.CONCLUSIONS: Data from this survey confirm: the excellent results of combined prophylaxis; the past and persistent use of Hepatitis B immunoglobulin-on and only rare -off prophylactic regimens, in contrast with the newest reports; the increasing use of anti-HBc-positive grafts; the past and present high prevalence of HBsag-positive recipients, due to an increase in candidates with either hepatocellular carcinoma and Hepatitis Delta Virus coinfection in the last years