Baseline information about the source population and the selected subgroups.

<p>Baseline information about the source population and the selected subgroups.</p

The risk ratios of three models investigating the risk of reporting future insomnia among individuals with a LBP/NP risk profile.

<p>* = statistical significance.</p

Model 2: Examining the effect of PA adherence on subjects with LBP/NP risk profiles that also reported pain at T1, on the risk of developing insomnia (n = 347).

<p>Model 2: Examining the effect of PA adherence on subjects with LBP/NP risk profiles that also reported pain at T1, on the risk of developing insomnia (n = 347).</p

Model 3: Examining the effect of PA adherence on subjects with LBP/NP risk profiles that did not report pain at T1, on the risk of developing insomnia (n = 85).

<p>Model 3: Examining the effect of PA adherence on subjects with LBP/NP risk profiles that did not report pain at T1, on the risk of developing insomnia (n = 85).</p

Additional file 2 of Are changes in pain associated with changes in heart rate variability in patients treated for recurrent or persistent neck pain?

Additional file 2: Appendix B. Stretch exercises to perform daily for 14 days

Additional file 11 of Are changes in pain associated with changes in heart rate variability in patients treated for recurrent or persistent neck pain?

Additional file 11: Supplementary file 9. Mean change in SDNN for the four pain trajectories

Additional file 9 of Are changes in pain associated with changes in heart rate variability in patients treated for recurrent or persistent neck pain?

Additional file 9: Supplementary file 7. Association between pain trajectories and HRV at baseline, using group 1. as the reference category (n=125)

Sub-group analysis of exercise preferences influenced by individual characteristics, age group.

<p>Sub-group analysis of exercise preferences influenced by individual characteristics, age group.</p

An example of a choice task.

<p>An example of a choice task.</p

Relative preference weight and the importance of the attributes for choice (n = 112).

<p>Relative preference weight and the importance of the attributes for choice (n = 112).</p