12 research outputs found
Probing Supergravity Models with Indirect Experimental Signatures
We explore the one-loop electroweak radiative corrections in the context of
the traditional minimal and the string-inspired
supergravity models by calculating explicitly vacuum-polarization and
vertex-correction contributions to the and
parameters. We also include in this analysis the constraint from whose inclusive branching ratio has been
actually measured very recently by CLEO. We find that by combining these three
most important indirect experimental signatures and using the most recent
experimental values for them, is excluded for
in both the minimal supergravity and the no-scale supergravity. We also find that is
excluded for any sign of in the minimal () supergravity
model.Comment: RevTeX 3.0, 16 Pages+4 figures(not included but available as a
uuencoded file from [email protected]), SNUTP-94-9
Zeroing In On the Top Quark, LSP and Scalar Higgs Masses
We estimate the top quark, lightest sparticle (LSP) and scalar higgs masses
within a supersymmetric grand unified framework in which and the electroweak symmetry is radiatively broken. The requirement
that the calculated quark mass lie close to its measured value, together
with the cosmological constraint , fixes the top quark
mass to be . The LSP (of bino purity
has mass . In the scalar
higgs sector the CP-odd scalar mass . With
, as suggested by the decay , we find and .Comment: 14 pages in plain LaTeX, BA-93-25, PRL-TH-93/
Constraints on the Minimal and Supergravity Models
We have performed a systematic analysis to compute the one-loop electroweak
corrections to the Z->b b-bar vertex in terms of and in the
context of the minimal and no-scale supergravity
models. With the measured top mass, \GeV ,
recently announced by CDF, we use the latest LEP data on and
() in order to constrain
further the two models. We find that the present LEP data on and
constrain the two models rather severely. Especially, the low-
region is constrained more severely. \tan\beta\lsim 2.5 is excluded
by at C.~L. for m_t\gsim 170 \GeV in the
minimal (no-scale ) supergravity. Even more stringent
constraint comes from . It excludes \tan\beta\lsim 4.0 at C.~L.
for m_t\gsim 160 \GeV in the minimal (no-scale ) supergravity. We also find that the sign on in the two models can
be determined from and at C.~L.Comment: RevTeX 3.0, 15 Pages+2 figures(not included but available as a
uuencoded file from [email protected]), SNUTP-94-6
Squark and Slepton Mass Relations in Grand Unified Theories
In the minimal supersymmetric standard model, assuming universal scalar
masses at large energies, there are four intragenerational relations between
the masses of the squarks and sleptons for each light generation. In this paper
we study the scalar mass relations which follow only from the assumption that
at large energies there is a grand unified theory which leads to a significant
prediction of the weak mixing angle. Two new intragenerational mass relations
for each of the light generations are derived. In addition, a third mass
relation is found which relates the Higgs masses, the masses of the third
generation scalars , and the masses of the scalars of the lighter generations.
Verification of a fourth mass relation, involvingonly the charged slepton
masses, provides a signal for SO(10) unification.Comment: 29 pages, LateX, 2 uuencoded figures include
The phase difference between neural drives to antagonist muscles in essential tremor is associated with the relative strength of supraspinal and afferent input
The pathophysiology of essential tremor (ET), the most common movement disorder, is not fully understood. We investigated which factors determine the variability in the phase difference between neural drives to antagonist muscles, a long-standing observation yet unexplained. We used a computational model to simulate the effects of different levels of voluntary and tremulous synaptic input to antagonistic motoneuron pools on the tremor. We compared these simulations to data from 11 human ET patients. In both analyses, the neural drive to muscle was represented as the pooled spike trains of several motor units, which provides an accurate representation of the common synaptic input to motoneurons. The simulations showed that, for each voluntary input level, the phase difference between neural drives to antagonist muscles is determined by the relative strength of the supraspinal tremor input to the motoneuron pools. In addition, when the supraspinal tremor input to one muscle was weak or absent, Ia afferents provided significant common tremor input due to passive stretch. The simulations predicted that without a voluntary drive (rest tremor) the neural drives would be more likely in phase, while a concurrent voluntary input (postural tremor) would lead more frequently to an out-of-phase pattern. The experimental results matched these predictions, showing a significant change in phase difference between postural and rest tremor. They also indicated that the common tremor input is always shared by the antagonistic motoneuron pools, in agreement with the simulations. Our results highlight that the interplay between supraspinal input and spinal afferents is relevant for tremor generation
Reconciling Supersymmetric Grand Unification with
We argue that supersymmetric grand unification of gauge couplings is not
incompatible with small , even without large GUT-scale corrections,
if one relaxes a usual universal gaugino mass assumption. A commonly assumed
relation is in gross contradiction with
. Instead, small favors . If this is indeed the case our observation casts doubt on another
commonly used relation which originates from the same
constraint of a common gaugino mass at the GUT scale. One firm prediction
emerging within the small scenario with the unconstrained gaugino
masses is the existence of a relatively light gluino below 200\gev.Comment: 18 pages, LaTex format for text; epsf.sty needed for including 3
Postscript figures in the text. CHANGES: Comments on dark matter and
non-minimal supergravity (see end of Sec. 2.3) and several references added;
also some minor corrections made
Constraints on Baryon-Nonconserving Yukawa Couplings in a Supersymmetric Theory
The 1-loop evolution of couplings in the minimal supersymmetric standard
model, extended to include baryon nonconserving operators through
explicit -parity violation, is considered keeping only
superpotential terms involving the maximum possible number of third generation
superfields. If all retained Yukawa couplings are required to remain in
the perturbative domain upto the scale of gauge group unification,
upper bounds ensue on the magnitudes of the coupling strengths at
the supersymmetry breaking scale, independent of the model of unification. They
turn out to be similar to the corresponding fixed point values reached from a
wide range of (including all greater than unity) at the unification
scale. The coupled evolution of the top and Yukawa couplings results
in a reduction of the fixed point value of the former.Comment: PRL-TH-94/8 and TIFR/TH/94-7, 15 pages, LaTe
Polarization of lepton from scalar tau decay as a probe of neutralino mixing
The lepton arising from the scalar tau (\st) decay is naturally
polarized. \ptau depends on the left--right mixing of the \st and the
gaugino--higgsino mixing of the neutralino. The polarization \ptau could be
measured from the energy distribution of the decay products of at future
\epem colliders. A measurement of \ptauand of the \st production cross
section allows to determine both these mixing angles.Comment: 20 pages Latex, 5 figures(not included). compressed ps file of the
figures available at ftp://ftp.kek.jp/kek/preprints/TH/TH-425/fig.ps.g
Naturalness and superpartner masses or when to give up on weak scale supersymmetry
Superpartner masses cannot be arbitrarily heavy if supersymmetric extensions
of the standard model explain the stability of the gauge hierarchy. This
ancient and hallowed motivation for weak scale supersymmetry is often quoted,
yet no reliable determination of this upper limit on superpartner masses
exists. In this paper we compute upper bounds on superpartner masses in the
minimal supersymmetric model, and we identify which values of the superpartner
masses correspond to the most natural explanation of the hierarchy stability.
We compare the most natural value of these masses and their upper limits to the
physics reach of current and future colliders. As a result, we find that
supersymmetry could explain weak scale stability naturally even if no
superpartners are discovered at LEP II or the Tevatron (even with the Main
Injector upgrade). However, we find that supersymmetry cannot provide a
complete explanation of weak scale stability, if squarks and gluinos have
masses beyond the physics reach of the LHC. Moreover, in the most natural
scenarios, many sparticles, for example, charginos, squarks, and gluinos, lie
within the physics reach of either LEP II or the Tevatron. Our analysis
determines the most natural value of the chargino (squark) ((gluino)) mass
consistent with current experimental constraints is 50 (250) ((250)) GeV
and the corresponding theoretical upper bound is 250 (700) ((800)) GeV.Comment: 14 pages, LaTex, 17 figures uuencoded, gz-compressed file. Minor
revisions bring archived manuscript in line with the published versio
Light Scalar Top and Heavy Top Signature at CDF
We propose a mechanism which could explain a slight excess of top signal rate
recently reported by CDF in the framework of the supersymmetric standard model.
If the scalar partner of the top (stop) is sufficiently light, the gluino with
an appropriate mass could decay into the stop plus the top with almost 100\%
branching ratio and experimental signatures of the gluino pair production could
be indistinguishable from those of the top production in the present integrated
luminosity Tevatron running. In this case the standard top signal,
multi-jets events, would be effectively enhanced by the additional gluino
contribution. It is shown, moreover, that such a mechanism can actually work in
the radiative SU(2)U(1) breaking model without the GUT relations
between the gaugino mass parameters.Comment: 8 pages (LaTeX), 3 figures not included (available on request) ;
ITP-SU-94/03, RUP-94-0