Serum Albumin Is Inversely Associated With Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis

We analyzed whether serum albumin is independently associated with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in liver cirrhosis (LC) and if a biologic plausibility exists. This study was divided into three parts. In part 1 (retrospective analysis), 753 consecutive patients with LC with ultrasound-detected PVT were retrospectively analyzed. In part 2, 112 patients with LC and 56 matched controls were entered in the cross-sectional study. In part 3, 5 patients with cirrhosis were entered in the in vivo study and 4 healthy subjects (HSs) were entered in the in vitro study to explore if albumin may affect platelet activation by modulating oxidative stress. In the 753 patients with LC, the prevalence of PVT was 16.7%; logistic analysis showed that only age (odds ratio [OR], 1.024; P = 0.012) and serum albumin (OR, -0.422; P = 0.0001) significantly predicted patients with PVT. Analyzing the 112 patients with LC and controls, soluble clusters of differentiation (CD)40-ligand (P = 0.0238), soluble Nox2-derived peptide (sNox2-dp; P < 0.0001), and urinary excretion of isoprostanes (P = 0.0078) were higher in patients with LC. In LC, albumin was correlated with sCD4OL (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient [r(s)], -0.33; P < 0.001), sNox2-dp (r(s), -0.57; P < 0.0001), and urinary excretion of isoprostanes (r(s), -0.48; P < 0.0001) levels. The in vivo study showed a progressive decrease in platelet aggregation, sNox2-dp, and urinary 8-iso prostaglandin F2 alpha-III formation 2 hours and 3 days after albumin infusion. Finally, platelet aggregation, sNox2-dp, and isoprostane formation significantly decreased in platelets from HSs incubated with scalar concentrations of albumin. Conclusion: Low serum albumin in LC is associated with PVT, suggesting that albumin could be a modulator of the hemostatic system through interference with mechanisms regulating platelet activation

Hypertonic saline solution and high-dose furosemide infusion in cardiorenal syndrome: our experience

Introduction Heart failure is frequently complicated by renal failure, and this association is a negative prognostic factor. These patients sometimes present oligo-/anuria and resistance to high-dose furosemide, a condition referred to as the cardiorenal syndrome (CRS). Acute or chronic reductions in left ventricular function result in decreased blood flow, with reduction of renal perfusion and activation of several neurohormonal systems, which cause resistance to diuretic therapy. This condition often requires ultrafiltration, which is an effective, but invasive and expensive procedure. Infusions of hypertonic saline solution (HSS) and high-dose furosemide can be an effective alternative. Materials and methods From November 2009 through May 2010, our team treated 20 patients with CRS and resistance to iv boluses of high-dose furosemide. These patients were treated with small-volume (150-250 mL) infusions of HSS (NaCl 1.57 – 4.5%, depending on serum Na values) and high-dose furosemide twice a day. The aim of this treatment is to modify renal hemodynamics and the water-saline balance in the kidney by counteracting the extracellular fluid accumulation and eliminating symptoms of congestion. Results In 18 patients (90%), urine output was restored and renal function improved during the first hours of treatment. Clinical improvement was evident from the first day of therapy, and there were no adverse events. Two patients (10%) did not respond to the treatment: one (who had been in critical condition since admission) died; the other required regular sessions of ultrafiltration. Conclusions HSS combined with high-dose furosemide is a safe, effective, low-cost approach to the treatment of CRS that is resistant to diuretic therapy

Muscular and cardiac adenosine-induced pain is mediated by A1receptors

AbstractObjectives. This study attempted to establish whether bamiphylline, a selective antagonist of A1adenosine receptors, prevents the algogenic effects of adenosine in humans.Background. Experimental findings indicate that the sympathoexcitatory response elicited by adenosine is mediated by A1receptors.Methods. An intrailiac infusion of increasing doses (from 125 to 2,000 μg/min) of adenosine was given to 20 patients. Adenosine infusion was then repeated after intrailiac infusion of either bamiphylline or saline solution. In 14 other patients with angina, increasing doses of adenosine (from 108 to 1,728 μg/min) were infused into the left coronary artery. Adenosine infusion was then repeated after the intravenous infusion of either bamiphylline or placebo. Coronary blood flow velocity was monitored by a Doppler catheter. Data relative to pain severity are expressed as median and all other data as mean value ± 1 SD.Results. Bamiphylline prolonged the time to pain onset caused by the intrailiac adenosine infusion from 444 ± 96 to 749 ± 120 s (p < 0.001) and reduced pain severity from 45 to 24 mm (p < 0.01). After placebo infusion, the time to pain onset and pain severity were similar to that of baseline (428 ± 112 vs. 430 ± 104 s, p = 0.87 and 44 vs. 43 mm, p = 0.67, respectively). Bamiphylline prolonged the time to pain onset caused by intracoronary adenosine infusion from 519 ± 128 to 603 ± 146 s (p < 0.01) and reduced pain severity from 58 to 28 mm (p < 0.02). After placebo infusion, the time to pain onset and pain severity were similar to that at baseline (542 ± 87 vs. 551 ± 79 s, p = 0.14 and 55 vs. 50 mm, p = 0.61). Maximal coronary blood flow velocities before and after bamiphylline administration were similar (47 ± 22 vs. 49 ± 24 cm/s, p = 0.36) as well as before and after placebo administration (40 ± 20 vs. 41 ± 20 cm/s, p = 0.07).Conclusions. Bamiphylline reduces adenosine-induced muscular and cardiac pain but does not affect adenosine-induced coronary vasodilation. These findings indicate that at the dose used in this study, bamiphylline does not detectably block vascular A2-receptor-mediated adenosine effects in humans, which suggests that the muscular and cardiac algogenic effects of adenosine are mediated mainly by A1receptors

Platelet Count Does Not Predict Bleeding in Cirrhotic Patients: Results from the PRO-LIVER Study.

OBJECTIVES: Thrombocytopenia is a hallmark for patients with cirrhosis and it is perceived as a risk factor for bleeding events. However, the relationship between platelet count and bleeding is still unclear. METHODS: We investigated the relationship between platelet count and major or clinical relevant nonmajor bleedings during a follow-up of ∼4 years. RESULTS: A total of 280 cirrhotic patients with different degrees of liver disease (67% males; age 64±37 years; 47% Child-Pugh B and C) were followed up for a median of 1,129 (interquartile range: 800-1,498) days yielding 953.12 patient-year of observation. The annual rate of any significant bleeding was 5.45%/year (3.57%/year and 1.89%/year for major and minor bleeding, respectively). Fifty-two (18.6%) patients experienced a major (n=34) or minor (n=18) bleeding event, predominantly from gastrointestinal origin. Platelet counts progressively decreased with the worsening of liver disease and were similar in patients with or without major or minor bleeding: a platelet count ≤50 × 103/μl was detected in 3 (6%) patients with and in 20 (9%) patients without any bleeding event. Conversely, prothrombin time-international normalized ratio was slightly higher in patients with overall or major bleeding. On Cox proportional hazard analysis, only a previous gastrointestinal bleeding (hazard ratio (HR): 1.96; 95% confidence interval: 1.11-3.47; P=0.020) and encephalopathy (HR: 2.05; 95% confidence interval: 1.16-3.62; P=0.013) independently predicted overall bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet count does not predict unprovoked major or minor bleeding in cirrhotic patients