Sink or source—The potential of coffee agroforestry systems to sequester atmospheric CO2 into soil organic carbon

Current carbon accounting methodologies often assume interactions between above-ground and below-ground carbon, without considering effects of land management. We used data from two long-term coffee agroforestry experiments in Costa Rica and Nicaragua to assess the effect on total soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks of (i) organic versus conventional management, (ii) higher versus moderate agronomic inputs, (iii) tree shade types. During the first nine years of coffee establishment total 0–40 cm depth SOC stocks decreased by 12.4% in Costa Rica and 0.13% in Nicaragua. Change in SOC differed consistently amongst soil layers: at 0–10 cm SOC stocks increased by 2.14 and 1.26 Mg C ha−1 in Costa Rica and Nicaragua respectively; however much greater reduction occurred at 20–40 cm (9.65 and 2.85 Mg C ha−1 respectively). Organic management caused a greater increase in 0–10 cm SOC but did not influence its reduction at depth. Effects of shade type were smaller, though heavily pruned legume shade trees produced a greater increase in 0–10 cm SOC than unpruned timber trees. No significant differences in SOC stocks were found between shaded and unshaded systems at any depth and SOC was poorly correlated with above-ground biomass stocks highlighting poor validity of “expansion factors” currently used to estimate SOC. SOC stock changes were significantly negatively correlated with initial SOC stock per plot, providing evidence that during establishment of these woody-plant-dominated agricultural systems SOC stocks tend to converge towards a new equilibrium as a function of the change in the quantity and distribution of organic inputs. Therefore it cannot be assumed that tree-based agricultural systems necessarily lead to increases in soil C stocks. While high inputs of organic fertiliser/tree pruning mulch increased surface-layer SOC stocks, this did not affect stocks in deeper soil, where decreases generally exceeded any gains in surface soil. Therefore site- and system-specific sampling is essential to draw meaningful conclusions for climate change mitigation strategies

Refuge effect of an unpalatable forb on community structure and grass morphology in a temperate grassland

The role of unpalatable plant species as biological antiherbivore refuges for palatable species is well-documented at community level particularly in harsh environments. In productive sub-humid temperate grassland subjected to domestic grazing, we examined the protective effect of Eryngium horridum on plant community structure and floristic composition, and evaluated whether these changes impacted on a number of morphological traits of grasses, related to grazing resistance. We also investigated, for a palatable grass species (Stipa neesiana) the existence of morphological differences between protected and unprotected plants and if this eventual variation was either plastic or genetic. The study consisted of a field survey where we compared paired patches, with and without E. horridum, and a greenhouse experiment where we evaluated individuals of S. neesiana coming from both patch types over a 11 months period. Patches dominated by E. horridum had lower richness and cover of forbs than patches without the forb, and similar richness but greater cover of cool-season tussock palatable grasses, which suggests a protective role on the latter. Grasses in these patches also had longer blades and sheaths and lower specific leaf area. The morphological differences of S. neesiana individuals collected from both patch types disappeared after 11 months growth in a common environment which revealed significant phenotypic plasticity in this species. These results suggest the existence of plant-to-plant facilitation in a productive ecosystem not only at community level, through changes in species richness and the promotion of palatable grasses, but also at population level, through plastic changes in aboveground morphological traits. Both facilitation and plasticity, would contribute to the persistence of threatened palatable grasses in the heavy grazed productive ecosystems.Fil: Nöell Estapé, Silvana E.. Universidad de la República. Estación Experimental Dr. Mario A. Cassinoni. Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Producción Animal y Pasturas; UruguayFil: Semmartin, María Gisela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaFil: Paruelo, José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; Argentin