Fast or safe? The role of impulsiveness in laparoscopic simulator performance

Contains fulltext : 225446.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Little is known about the relation between impulsiveness and surgical performance even though research in similar high-risk/high-skills shows evidence of more hazardous behavior by impulsive professionals. We investigated the impact of impulsiveness on laparoscopic simulator performance. METHODS: Eighty-three subjects participated in a four-session laparoscopic training course. Based on the Eysenck Personality test, we created equal sized high- and low impulsiveness groups and compared task duration and errors on tasks for two laparoscopic simulators. RESULTS: The low impulsiveness group outperformed the high impulsiveness group on damage on the LapSim virtual reality trainer (U = 459, p < .049), and showed a trend towards better error performance on the FLS videotrainer. We found no differences on task duration. CONCLUSIONS: In surgical simulation training, high impulsiveness is associated with creating more damage, but not with faster performance. Time needed to correct errors may have obscured faster performance in the high impulsiveness group. SUMMARY FOR THE TABLE OF CONTENTS: Subjects were divided into high- and low impulsiveness groups based on the Eysenck Impulsiveness Inventory test. Performance (time and errors) were compared between groups for tasks on the LapSim virtual reality trainer and FLS videotrainer. Low impulsive subjects outperformed high impulsive subjects on errors

Peers versus Pros: Feedback using standards in simulation training

Item does not contain fulltex

Speed versus damage: using selective feedback to modulate laparoscopic simulator performance

Abstract Background Adaptive training is an approach in which training variables change with the needs and traits of individual trainees. It has potential to mitigate the effect of personality traits such as impulsiveness on surgical performance. Selective performance feedback is one way to implement adaptive training. This paper investigates whether selective feedback can direct performance of trainees of either high- or low impulsiveness. Methods A total of 83 inexperienced medical students of known impulsiveness performed a four-session laparoscopic training course on a Virtual Reality Simulator. They performed two identical series of tasks every session. During one series of tasks they received performance feedback on duration and during the other series they received feedback on damage. Performance parameters (duration and damage) were compared between the two series of tasks to assess whether selective performance feedback can be used to steer emphasis in performance. To assess the effectiveness of selective feedback for people of high- or low impulsiveness, the difference in performance between the two series for both duration and damage was also assessed. Results Participants were faster when given performance feedback for speed for all exercises in all sessions (average z-value = − 4.14, all p values < .05). Also, they performed better on damage control when given performance feedback for damage in all tasks and during all sessions except for one (average z-value = − 4.19, all but one p value < .05). Impulsiveness did not impact the effectiveness of selective feedback. Conclusion Selective feedback on either duration or damage can be used to improve performance for the variable that the trainee receives feedback on. Trainee impulsiveness did not modulate this effect. Selective feedback can be used to steer training focus in adaptive training systems and can mitigate the negative effects of impulsiveness on damage control

Construct Validity of a Serious Game for Laparoscopic Skills Training: Validation Study

Contains fulltext : 221447.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Competency assessment tool for laparoscopic suturing: development and reliability evaluation

Contains fulltext : 221445.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access