Conventional and algorithmic music listening before radiotherapy treatment: A randomized controlled pilot study

Music listening is a widespread approach in the field of music therapy. In this study, the effects of music listening on anxiety and stress in patients undergoing radiotherapy are investigated. Sixty patients with breast cancer who were candidates for postoperative curative radiotherapy were recruited and randomly assigned to three groups: Melomics-Health (MH) group (music listening algorithmically created, n = 20); individualized music listening (IML) group (playlist of preferred music, n = 20); no music group (n = 20). Music listening was administered for 15 min immediately before simulation and during the first five radiotherapy sessions. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Psychological Distress Inventory (PDI) were administered before/after treatment. Cochran’s Q test and McNemar test for paired proportions were performed to evaluate if the proportion of subjects having an outcome score below the critical value by treatment and over time was different, and if there was a change in that proportion. The MH group improved in STAI and PDI. The IML group worsened in STAI at T1 and improved STAI-Trait at T2. The IML group worsened in PDI at T2. The No music group generally improved in STAI and PDI. Clinical and music listening-related implications are discussed defining possible research perspectives in this field

Comparison between intensified neoadjuvant treatment and standard preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer

Objectives. The aim of the current study was to compare a neoadjuvant regimen containing oxaliplatin with standard preoperative treatment for rectal cancer. Methods. From December 2006 to December 2007, 20 patients with rectal cancer were treated at our Institution with the weekly addition of oxaliplatin (50 mg/mz) to radiotherapy (50.4-54.0 Gy in 28-30 daily fractions) and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (200 mg/m(2)). The results of the regimen were compared with a historical control group including 21 consecutive patients previously treated with standard 5-fluorouracil treatment from December 2004 to October 2006. Results. Both the rate of sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer (91.7% vs 36.4%, P = 0.009) and the rate of downstaging (84.2% vs 47.6%, P = 0.023) were higher in the oxaliplatin group than in the control group. Pathological complete response was achieved in 8 patients (42.1%) in the oxaliplatin group and in 4 patients (19.0%) in the control group (P = 0.172). When ypT0-pT1 stages were analyzed together, the P value was 0.051, Acute toxicity was increased in the oxaliplatin group, with a higher incidence of G3 diarrhea and pelvic pain than in the control group (30.0% vs 14.3%, P = NS). Conclusions. Our data seem to correlate the addition of oxaliplatin to the standard treatment for rectal cancer with higher rates of sphincter preservation, down-staging and complete response. Toxicity is increased and requires careful monitoring. However, our results refer to a retrospective comparison of a small series of patients and need to be validated by the large, phase III randomized trial currently ongoing. Free full text available at www.tumorionline.i

One-step intraoperative radiotherapy optimizes conservative treatment of breast cancer with advantages in quality of life and work resumption

Background: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) could be not-inferior to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in selected patients, but toxicities, self-perception of body image, quality of life, and resumption of work or daily activities have been poorly explored. The aim of the present study was to compare these outcomes between EBRT, IORT full-dose (IORT-f) and IORT boost (IORT-b). Methods: 443 consecutive patients, candidates for breast-conserving surgery, were included: EBRT was performed in 220 patients (49.7%), IORT-f in 140 patients (31.6%), and IORT-b in 83 patients (18.7%). Radiotherapy-related toxicities were registered. Patients were evaluated at 6 months for Body Image after Breast Cancer Questionnaire (BIBCQ) to assess possible changes in self-perception of body image and limitations. A second questionnaire explored the impact of EBRT, IORT-f and IORT-b on resumption of work and normal daily activities. Results: EBRT had a higher risk of breast fibrosis and retraction (OR 3.58, 95% CI 1.024\u201312.526, p = 0.046) and breast edema (OR 6, 95% CI 2.077\u201317.335, p = 0.001) compared to IORT-f, but a lower risk of seroma compared to IORT-b (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.166\u20130.785, p = 0.01). The BIBCQ scores showed a better outcome in arm concerns with IORT-f ( 123.3) vs. IORT-b ( 121.3, p = 0.002) and EBRT ( 121.7, p = 0.006), although biased by the lower rate in axillary dissections. Return to daily activities occurred after 70.6 days with EBRT vs. 41 days with IORT-f (p < 0.0001) and 53.3 days with IORT-b (p = 0.07), without any effect of age or axillary dissection. Conclusion: IORT could reduce adverse effects, allowing faster resumption of job and houseworks

Second malignancies following breast cancer treatment : a case-control study based on the Peridose methodology. Allegro project (task 5.4)

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To calculate peripheral radiation dose to the second primary site in patients who have developed a second malignancy after breast cancer radiotherapy (index cases) and to compare it with dose in the analogous anatomical site in radiotherapy-treated breast cancer patients who did not experience a second malignancy (controls). To evaluate the feasibility of Peridose-software peripheral dose calculation in retrospective case-control studies. MATERIAL AND STUDY DESIGN: A case-control study on 12,630 patients who underwent adjuvant breast radiotherapy was performed. Minimum 5-year follow-up was required. Each index case was matched with 5 controls by 1) year of birth, 2) year of radiotherapy and 3) follow-up duration. Peridose-software was used to calculate peripheral dose. RESULTS: 195 second cancers were registered (0.019% of all patients treated with adjuvant irradiation). Several methodological limitations of the Peridose calculation were encountered including impossibility to calculate the peripheral dose in the patients treated with intraoperative or external electron beam radiotherapy, in case of second tumors located at <15 cm from the radiotherapy field etc. Moreover, Peridose requires full radiotherapy data and the distance between radiotherapy field and second primary site. Due to these intrinsic limitations, only 6 index cases were eligible for dose calculation. Calculated doses at the second cancer site in index cases and in an analogous site in controls ranged between 7.5 and 145 cGy. The mean index-control dose difference was -3.15 cGy (range, -15.8 cGy and +2.7 cGy). CONCLUSIONS: The calculated peripheral doses were low and the index-control differences were small. However, the small number of eligible patients precludes a reliable analysis of a potential dose-response relationship. Large patient series followed for a long period and further improvement in the methodology of the peripheral dose calculation are necessary in order to overcome the methodological challenges of the study