14 research outputs found
ΠΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ-Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΠ±ΡΠΈΠ»Π»ΡΡΠΎΡΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅Π·Π°ΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ: Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-Π°Π½Π°ΠΌΠ½Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΊΡΠ·Π±Π°ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°
Aim. To study clinical and anamnestic data of patients with implantable cardioverterdefibrillators (ICD) for primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) based on the data from the Kuzbass ICD registry.Methods. Retrospective analysis of demographic, clinical and anamnestic data from the βKuzbass Registry of Patients with Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillatorβ, which includes 286 patients admitted at the Kuzbass Cardiology Center in 2015β2019, was carried out.Results. The age of patients included in the registry was 59 (53; 66) years, 239 (83.6%) were men; all patients were diagnosed with heart failure. ICD for primary prevention of SCD was prescribed in 171 (63.6%) patients (group 1) and for secondary prevention in 98 (36.4%) patients (group 2). The groups were comparable in age, sex, main nosology (coronary artery disease), left ventricular ejection fraction (31.4 (26; 35) and 30 (10; 68)%, p = 0.389). Compared with the group 2, the group 1 had fewer working patients, higher incidence of heart defects, severe heart failure, higher incidence of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (68.7% versus 44.8%, p = 0.001), and higher rates of revascularization (48, 9% and 31.7%, respectively, p = 0.006). Before ICD implantation for heart failure, 210 (73.4%) patients were receiving renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors, 259 (90.6%) β beta-blockers, 167 (58.4%) β mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. There were no differences in prescribed treatment between the groups. Only 137 (47.9%) patients, 86 (47.3%) patients in the group 1 and 51 (49.0%) patients in the group 2 received triple neurohormonal blockade. Remote monitoring was used only within the framework of research programs.Conclusion. The primary cohort of patients with ICD is the primary SCD prevention group. Regardless of the type of SCD prevention, the underlying disease is coronary artery disease. Current guidelines for optimal drug therapy and myocardial revascularization are not always followed prior to ICD implantation. The creation of registries of patients with ICD is an effective way to identify existing problems in ICD patient selection and to optimize follow-up and treatment.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ. ΠΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-Π°Π½Π°ΠΌΠ½Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ-Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΠ±ΡΠΈΠ»Π»ΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ (ΠΠΠ) Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅Π·Π°ΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ (ΠΠ‘Π‘) Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΠ·Π±Π°ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°.ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
, ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-Π°Π½Π°ΠΌΠ½Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΠ·Π±Π°ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ-Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΠ±ΡΠΈΠ»Π»ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ, Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ 286 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
, Π³ΠΎΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π² ΠΡΠ·Π±Π°ΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΏΠ°Π½ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π°ΠΊΠ°Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° Π.Π‘. ΠΠ°ΡΠ±Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ° Ρ 2015 ΠΏΠΎ 2019 Π³.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π² ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡ Π»ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ» 59 (53; 66) Π»Π΅Ρ, 239 (83,6%) β ΠΌΡΠΆΡΠΈΠ½Ρ, Ρ Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ. ΠΠΠ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ 171 (63,6%) Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΠ‘Π‘ (Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ° 1) ΠΈ 98 (36,4%) ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ (Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ° 2). ΠΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ Π½Π΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»Ρ, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ (ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄ΡΠ°), ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΠ±ΡΠΎΡΠ° Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° (31,4 (26; 35) ΠΈ 30 (10; 68) % ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ, p = 0,389). ΠΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠΎΠΉ 2 Π² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ 1 Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄ΡΠ°, ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π»Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ, ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠ’ (68,7 ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 44,8%, p = 0,001) ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π²Π°ΡΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° (48,9 ΠΈ 31,7% ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ, p = 0,006). ΠΠΎ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°-Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΠ±ΡΠΈΠ»Π»ΡΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ 210 (73,4%) Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ Π±Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ½-Π°Π½Π³ΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠ½-Π°Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ, 259 (90,6%) β Π±Π΅ΡΠ°-Π°Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΡ, 167 (58,4%) β Π°Π½ΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΠΎΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ². Π Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ Π² Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π½Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ. Π’ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ Π±Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π΄Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ 137 (47,9%) ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ²: 86 (47,3%) Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ 1 ΠΈ 51 (49,0%) Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ 2. Π‘ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ, ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Π² ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌ.ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΠΠ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΠ‘Π‘. ΠΠ΅Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΠΎΡ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΠ‘Π‘ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΠΠ‘. ΠΠΎ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° Π½Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅Π³Π΄Π° Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΡΡΡΡ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π²Π°ΡΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°. Π‘ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠΎΠ² Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Ρ ΠΠΠ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΠΠΠ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅.
ΠΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π°Π΄Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄ΡΠ°
Highlights. Current and emerging approaches in diagnosis and treatment strategies in cardiac tamponade are discussed. Particular attention is focused on the choice between pericardiocentesis or open surgical drainage as live-saving approaches to treat pericardial effusion in patients with urgent conditions.The article provides a systematic review of the literature on current and emerging approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac tamponade. We explored the decision-making process in diagnosis and treatment of pericardial decompression in pericardial effusion to provide clinicians with additional support in the assessment of high-risk patients requiring immediate intervention and those patients who should be transferred to specialized clinics and/or can be safely delayed for pericardiocentesis. The complex issues of choosing between pericardiocentesis or open surgical drainage of pericardial effusion to save the lives of patients with urgent conditions are considered. In addition, the practical aspects of manipulations and technologies for monitoring their implementation are highlighted.ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ Π²Π·Π³Π»ΡΠ΄Π°ΠΌ Π½Π° Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π°Π΄Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄ΡΠ°. Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅Π·Π° ΠΈ Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠ° Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΏΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡ
.Π ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ
Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π°Π΄Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄ΡΠ°. Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΠΌ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π΄Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π°, ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈ Π² ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΌ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΡ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅Π·Π°. ΠΡΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅Π·Π° ΠΈ Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠ° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌ Π² Π½Π΅ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡ
. ΠΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ
Π₯Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ Π·ΠΌΡΠ½ ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΠΈ, ΠΌΡΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Ρ ΡΠ° ΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΊΡ Π² ΡΡΡΡΠ² Π·Π° ΡΠΌΠΎΠ² Π·Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ±Π°ΠΌΠ°Π·Π΅ΠΏΡΠ½Ρ ΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½Ρ.
We investigated the histological changes in rats after new complex drug administration. Seventy male white rats were used for this experiment. During 90 days they received carbamazepin and thyotriazolin compound. Compound were administered orally via gavage. We observed damaging action of high dose carbamazepin on hepar, myocardium and stomach. Our data suggest that thyotriazolin reduce toxic effect of carbamazepin on hepar, myocardium and stomach.Π ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
Π½Π° Π±Π΅Π»ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΡΡΠ°Ρ
Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π³ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°Π±Π»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΊ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ±Π°ΠΌΠ°Π·Π΅ΠΏΠΈΠ½Π° Ρ ΡΠΈΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π΄Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ 90-Π΄Π½Π΅Π²Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΊ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ, ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΊΠ°. Π£ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π΄Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ· ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ±Π°ΠΌΠ°Π·Π΅ΠΏΠΈΠ½Π° Π²ΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΄ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΄Π²ΠΈΠ³ΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Ρ Π³Π΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎ-Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°ΠΏΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°,Π² ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄ΡΠ° Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΈ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°, ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ Π΄ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΡΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π³Π°ΡΡΡΠΈΡ. Π’ΠΈΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ½ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π» ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π» ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎ-, Π³Π°ΡΡΡΠΎ- ΠΈ Π³Π΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ· ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ±Π°ΠΌΠ°Π·Π΅ΠΏΠΈΠ½Π°.Π£ Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π½Π° Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ
Π·Π° Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡ Π³ΡΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ·Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π΄ΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°Π±Π»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΊ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ±Π°ΠΌΠ°Π·Π΅ΠΏΡΠ½Ρ Π· ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎΠΌΡ 90-Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½Ρ Π½Π° ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π½ ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΠΈ, ΠΌΡΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄Π°, ΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΊΠ°. ΠΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Π΅ Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌ Π²ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ· ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ±Π°ΠΌΠ°Π·Π΅ΠΏΡΠ½Ρ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΄ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π· Π±ΠΎΠΊΡ Π³Π΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎ-Π±ΡΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°, Π² Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ, ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ³Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΈ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠΎΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°Π±ΡΡΠΊΡ, Π²ΠΈΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ·Π°Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Π³Π°ΡΡΡΠΈΡ. Π’ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ Π·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ²Π°Π² Π°Π±ΠΎ Π½ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΡΠ²Π°Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΡΠΎ-, Π³Π°ΡΡΡΠΎ- Ρ Π³Π΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ½Ρ Π΄ΡΡ Π²ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ· ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ±Π°ΠΌΠ°Π·Π΅ΠΏΡΠ½Ρ
ΠΠ½ΡΠΈΠ±ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ: Π²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Ρ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ
Age-specific aspects of nephrotoxicity with antibiotic therapy, its main pathophysiological mechanisms, methods of diagnosis, prevention and correction of nephropathy have been analyzed in a brief review.Π ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ, ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ.Π£ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΎΠ³Π»ΡΠ΄Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Ρ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠ±ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΡΡ, Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΡΡΠ·ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½Ρ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΡΠ·ΠΌΠΈ, ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈ Π΄ΡΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΡΡ
Features of in-hospital clinical course of pulmonary embolism in patients of different age groups
Aim. To study the clinical course and management of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) of various age groups hospitalized in a cardiology hospital.Material and methods. This prospective single-center study in the period from 2016 to 2018 included 154 patients with PE verified by computed tomography. Statistical processing was conducted using the MedCalcVersion 16.2.1 software package (Softwa, Belgium).Results. In all groups, female patients dominated, but the highest number of women (70,7%) belonged to the group of senile patients, while in the group <60 years, only half of patients with PE were women. Comorbid cardiovascular disease and deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed in eldest patients significantly more often than in those <60 years of age. The highest prevalence of cancer and recurrent PE were identified in the group of elderly patients. Thrombolytic therapy was performed most often in patients 60-75 years old, since these patients had a high risk of 30-day mortality according to Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index, but did not have severe comorbidities, as patients older than 75 years. An increase of right atrium size was found in the group of elderly and senile patients in comparison with patients <60 years. The highest pulmonary artery systolic and diastolic pressure was observed in the patients older than 75 years.Conclusion. In the Kemerovo Oblast, PE most often develops in patients aged 60-75 years and is characterized by a more severe clinical course compared with patients younger than 60 years. Patients over the 60 years of age have severe cardiovascular comorbidity status, atrial fibrillation/flutter and recurrent PE. Surgical treatment for senile patients is limited due to the high risk of postoperative complications, which specifies high mortality. Patients <60 years of age are a third of all patients hospitalized with PE. They have a low risk of mortality, but have an unfavorable course of the hospital period
Risk factors associated with the development of death events during the first year of follow-up after pulmonary thromboembolism
Purpose: to identify the factors associated with the development of death events during the year follow-up after hospitalization for pulmonary embolism (PE). Materials and methods: 93 patients with PE discharged to the outpatient stage of observation were studied. 45 (61,6%) patients were female with an average age of 66 years. The examination of patients at the stage of inclusion in the study consisted of standard methods of examination for this pathology. The diagnosis was confirmed by multislice computed tomography. Follow-up was 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using the MedCalc Version 16.2.1. Results: during the one-year follow-up period 62 (66,7%) patients with PE were alive but 11 patients (11,8%) died, and no information was obtained about 20 patients. The causes of death were as follows: the development of recurrent PE β 4 (36,4%) patients, cancer β 3 patients (27,3%), stroke β 2 (18,1%), one patient (9,1%) died due to severe heart failure and one β myocardial infarction. A comparative analysis in the groups of alive patients (n = 62) and patients with a fatal events (n = 11) showed that the dead patients were older (78 (68; 81) vs. 65 (49; 75) years; p = 0,003), had a higher PESI score (119,0 (99,7; 137,2) vs. 88,0 (68,0; 108,0); p = 0,016) and were less compliant to prolonged anticoagulant therapy during the one year of observation (45,5% of patients (n = 5) vs. 82,3% ( = 51); p = 0,015). The ROC curve determined that a high risk of death during the one year after PE is associated with age over 70 years (p = 0,0001) and more than 95 points by PESI in the hospital period (p = 0,0001). Conclusion: The death events were developed in 11,8% of cases in patients with pulmonary embolism during the first year of follow-up. The death outcomes were significantly associated with elderly age, intermediate and high risk by PESI in the hospital period and low compliance to anticoagulant therapy extended during the year after pulmonary embolism
Antiarrhythmic drug therapy after atrial fibrillation ablation: data of the ESC-EHRA registry
Aim. Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective approach for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF), however antiarrhythmic therapy (AAT) remains important. There is a lack of data about long-term AAT use after CA. This study evaluates AAT after CA for AF.Material and methods. In 2012-2016, EURObservational Research Programme of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Long-Term (EORP AFA L-T) registry was conducted, which included 476 Russian patients (57,1% β men; mean age β 57,1Β±8,7 years). The follow-up after CA was 12 months (available in 81,9% of patients). The use of AAT was evaluated prior to hospitalization, during hospitalization for CA, as well as at 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up.Results. Prior to CA, 439 (92,2%) patients received AAT During CA, 459 (96,4%) patients were treated with AAT. After CA, AAT was used by 463 (97,3%), 370 (94,8%), and 307 (78,7%) patients at 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up, respectively. There was no arrhythmia recurrence in 187 (47,9%) subjects. Among these patients, 40 (21,4%) received class IC or III AAT. The peak of AAT use was found for class IC agents within 3 months after CA (P<0,05), while for other drugs this trend was not observed. There were no factors associated with AAT usage in patients without arrhythmia recurrence after CA. A positive correlation of arrhythmia non-recurrence with a minimum number of previously used antiarrhythmic agents was revealed (RR=0,85; 95% CI 0,73-0,98; P=0,03).Conclusion. The frequency of AAT use after AF ablation is significantly reduced. However, there is a cohort of patients without documented arrhythmia recurrence still receiving AAT, which requires special attention of physicians. There were no clinical predictors of continued AAT in subjects without arrhythmia recurrence