The impact of preoperative anxiety and education level on long-term mortality after cardiac surgery

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Psychosocial factors have shown independent predictive value in the development of cardiovascular diseases. Although there is strong evidence to support the role of psychosocial factors in cardiovascular mortality, there is a scarcity of knowledge about how these factors are related. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between depression, anxiety, education, social isolation and mortality 7.5 years after cardiac surgery.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>After informed consent, 180 patients undergoing cardiac surgery between July 2000 and May 2001 were prospectively enrolled and followed for ten years. During the follow-up period, the patients were contacted annually by mail. Anxiety (Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI-S/STAI-T), depression (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI) and the number and reason for rehospitalizations were assessed each year. Those patients who did not respond were contacted by telephone, and national registries were searched for deaths.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>During a median follow-up of 7.6 years (25^th to 75^th percentile, 7.4 to 8.1 years), the mortality rate was 23.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.3-29.9; 42 deaths). In a Cox regression model, the risk factors associated with an increased risk of mortality were a higher EUROSCORE (points; Adjusted Hazard Ratio (AHR):1.30, 95%CI:1.07-1.58)), a higher preoperative STAI-T score (points; AHR:1.06, 95%CI 1.02-1.09), lower education level (school years; AHR:0.86, 95%CI:0.74-0.98), and the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events during follow up (AHR:7.24, 95%CI:2.65-19.7). In the postdischarge model, the same risk factors remained.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our results suggest that the assessment of psychosocial factors, particularly anxiety and education may help identify patients at an increased risk for long-term mortality after cardiac surgery.</p

Donor Pericardial Interleukin and Apolipoprotein Levels May Predict the Outcome after Human Orthotopic Heart Transplantation

The proinflammatory cascade that is activated at the time of brain death plays a crucial role in organ procurement. Our aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the clinical outcome of orthotopic heart transplantation, as well as cytokine and apolipoprotein profiles of the pericardial fluid obtained at donation. Interleukin, adipokine and lipoprotein levels in the pericardial fluid, as well as clinical data of twenty donors after brain death, were investigated. Outcome variables included primary graft dysfunction, the need for posttransplantation mechanical cardiac support and International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade ≥ 2R rejection. Hormone management and donor risk scores were also investigated. Lower levels of IL-6 were observed in primary graft dysfunction (median: 36.72 [IQR: 19.47–62.90] versus 183.67 [41.21–452.56]; p = 0.029) and in the need for mechanical cardiac support (44.12 [20.12–85.70] versus 247.13 [38.51–510.38]; p = 0.043). Rejection was associated with lower ApoAII (p = 0.021), ApoB100 (p = 0.032) and ApoM levels (p = 0.025). Lower adipsin levels were detected in those patients receiving desmopressin (p = 0.037); moreover, lower leptin levels were found in those patients receiving glucocorticoid therapy (p = 0.045), and higher T3 levels were found in those patients treated with L-thyroxine (p = 0.047) compared to those patients not receiving these hormone replacement therapies. IL-5 levels were significantly associated with UNOS-D score (p = 0.004), Heart Donor Score (HDS) and Adapted HDS (p < 0.001). The monitoring of immunological and metabolic changes in donors after brain death may help in the prediction of potential complications after heart transplantation, thus potentially optimizing donor heart allocation

'It's not just about the money': Non-resident fathers' perspectives on paying child support

This article explores the question 'Why do fathers resist paying child support?' through interviews with 26 separated or divorced non-residential fathers in Australia. Drawing on Zelizer's typology we argue that the men in this study attempt to define child support as a gift - a payment that emphasizes the power and beneficence of the payer and the obligation of the receiver - but struggle to do so in legal and bureaucratic structures that position its receipt as an entitlement. The tension between child support as a gift and child support as entitlement is informed by gendered power over money, a key element of fathering in traditional and non-traditional family structures.The payment and non-payment of child support is used to reinforce the economic dimensions of fathering identities and define family relationships in remarkably traditional ways