Smile outcomes when using masseteric nerve-based nerve transfers versus direct muscle neurotization in facial palsy patients

Background: When dealing with a weak smile, nerve transfer is a viable strategy. We evaluated outcomes of masseteric nerve to facial nerve transfers and compared them with direct muscle neurotization (DMN). Methods: In a retrospective cohort study of 20 patients (n = 20), we compared nerve transfer versus DMN over a 6-year period (2016–2021). Outcomes were measured using the validated Sunnybrook score, Ackerman Smile Index, and Terzis scores. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon sign rank and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Comparing pre- versus postoperative scores after nerve transfers, there was a significant improvement in median overall Sunnybrook score (24 versus 47, P = 0.043), lip elevation (1 versus 2, P = 0.046), open mouth smile (1 versus 3, P = 0.003), and Terzis scores (1 versus 3, P = 0.005), with no difference in resting symmetry (−15 versus −5; P = 0.496). Compared with DMN, there was no difference in median Terzis score improvement from preoperative to postoperative state (2 versus 1, P = 0.838), median smile improvement (2 versus 2, P = 0.838), resting symmetry (10 versus 5, P = 0.144) or overall Sunnybrook score (23 versus 21, P = 1.000). Lip elevation improvement was in favor of nerve transfers (1 versus 0, P = 0.047). Conclusions: This is the first study evaluating nerve transfer neurotization of smile-mimetic muscles and comparing the outcomes with DMN, with masseteric nerve as donor. Nerve transfer leads to improved facial mimetic function, smile excursion and open mouth smiles, as does DMN, with improvement in lip elevation in favor of nerve transfer. Nerve transfer was preferred for more severe smile weakness

A comparison of outcomes between finger and pulp replantation/revascularization in a single centre

Background: Supermicrosurgery has allowed the replantation/revascularization of the pulp, but how does this currently compare with more proximal digit replantation/revascularization? Methods: In a retrospective case study over a 5-year period at our institute, a total of 21 patients (n = 21) had either finger or pulp replantation-revascularization posttrauma. All pulp replants had a single-vessel anastomosis viz., “artery-to-artery” or “artery-to-vein” only, with venous outflow dependent on the skin-shave technique, while more proximal replants had both arterial and venous anastomoses. Age, sex, ischemic time, handedness, smoker status, and injury-replant interval were compared between the two groups, with all procedures performed by a single surgeon. The outcome parameters studied were length of hospital stay, timeline for wound healing, viability, and functional outcomes. Results: Our patients consisted of 18 men and three women, of which 14.3% were smokers and 85.7% were right-handed. There were 11 finger replantation/revascularizations (n = 11) versus 10 pulp replantation/revascularizations (n = 10). The average age of digit replantation/revascularization patients was 44.8 years compared with 26.4 years in pulp replantation/revascularization patients (Student t test, P = 0.04). Mean ischemia time in digital replants was 67 minutes versus 32.3 minutes in pulp replantation/revascularization (Student t test, P = 0.056). Digital replantation/revascularization was viable in 72% of cases versus a 90% viability in the pulp subcohort. Conclusions: In our patient cohort, pulp replantation/revascularizations produced better postoperative viability. Where supermicrosurgery expertise is available, pulp replantation/revascularization should be considered a worthwhile option when compared with digital replantation/revascularization

Isolation of monomeric s-trans-acrylic acid as a hydroxy host inclusion crystal showing anomalous C=O stretching absorptions

The structure of monomeric s-trans-acrylic acid, trapped in an inclusion complex with an hydroxy host, was elucidated by X-ray analysis

Complex reconstructions in head and neck cancer surgery: decision making

Defects in head and neck after tumor resection often provide significant functional and cosmetic deformity. The challenge for reconstruction is not only the aesthetic result, but the functional repair. Cancer may involve composite elements and the in sano resection may lead to an extensive tissue defect. No prospective randomized controlled studies for comparison of different free flaps are available. There are many options to cover defects and restore function in the head and neck area, however we conclude from experience that nearly all defects in head and neck can be closed by 5 different free flaps: radial forearm flap, free fibula flap, anterior lateral thigh flap, lateral arm flap and parascapular flap

Nerve tolerance to high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Brachytherapy, interstitial tumor bed irradiation, following conservative surgery has been shown to provide excellent local control and limb preservation in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS), whereas little is known about the tolerance of peripheral nerves to brachytherapy. In particular, nerve tolerance to high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy has never been properly evaluated. In this study, we examined the efficacy and radiation neurotoxicity of HDR brachytherapy in patients with STS in contact with neurovascular structures. METHODS: Between 1995 and 2000, seven patients with STS involving the neurovascular bundle were treated in our institute with limb-preserving surgery, followed by fractionated HDR brachytherapy. Pathological examination demonstrated that 6 patients had high-grade lesions with five cases of negative margins and one case with positive margins, and one patient had a low-grade lesion with a negative margin. Afterloading catheters placed within the tumor bed directly upon the preserved neurovascular structures were postoperatively loaded with Iridium-192 with a total dose of 50 Gy in 6 patients. One patient received 30 Gy of HDR brachytherapy combined with 20 Gy of adjuvant external beam radiation. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 4 years, the 5-year actuarial overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control rates were 83.3, 68.6, and 83.3%, respectively. None of the 7 patients developed HDR brachytherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Of 5 survivors, 3 evaluable patients had values of motor nerve conduction velocity of the preserved peripheral nerve in the normal range. CONCLUSION: In this study, there were no practical and electrophysiological findings of neurotoxicity of HDR brachytherapy. Despite the small number of patients, our encouraging results are valuable for limb-preserving surgery of unmanageable STS involving critical neurovascular structures