A Ligand Channel through the G Protein Coupled Receptor Opsin

The G protein coupled receptor rhodopsin contains a pocket within its seven-transmembrane helix (TM) structure, which bears the inactivating 11-cis-retinal bound by a protonated Schiff-base to Lys296 in TM7. Light-induced 11-cis-/all-trans-isomerization leads to the Schiff-base deprotonated active Meta II intermediate. With Meta II decay, the Schiff-base bond is hydrolyzed, all-trans-retinal is released from the pocket, and the apoprotein opsin reloaded with new 11-cis-retinal. The crystal structure of opsin in its active Ops* conformation provides the basis for computational modeling of retinal release and uptake. The ligand-free 7TM bundle of opsin opens into the hydrophobic membrane layer through openings A (between TM1 and 7), and B (between TM5 and 6), respectively. Using skeleton search and molecular docking, we find a continuous channel through the protein that connects these two openings and comprises in its central part the retinal binding pocket. The channel traverses the receptor over a distance of ca. 70 Å and is between 11.6 and 3.2 Å wide. Both openings are lined with aromatic residues, while the central part is highly polar. Four constrictions within the channel are so narrow that they must stretch to allow passage of the retinal β-ionone-ring. Constrictions are at openings A and B, respectively, and at Trp265 and Lys296 within the retinal pocket. The lysine enforces a 90° elbow-like kink in the channel which limits retinal passage. With a favorable Lys side chain conformation, 11-cis-retinal can take the turn, whereas passage of the all-trans isomer would require more global conformational changes. We discuss possible scenarios for the uptake of 11-cis- and release of all-trans-retinal. If the uptake gate of 11-cis-retinal is assigned to opening B, all-trans is likely to leave through the same gate. The unidirectional passage proposed previously requires uptake of 11-cis-retinal through A and release of photolyzed all-trans-retinal through B

New Insight into the Effects of Various Parameters on the Crystallization of Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase (RuBisCO) from <i>Alcaligenes eutrophus</i>

Crystallization remains a bottleneck for determining the three-dimensional X-ray structure of proteins. Many parameters influence the complexity of protein crystallization. Therefore, it is not easy to systematically examine all of these parameters individually during crystallization because of a limited quantity of purified protein. We studied several factors that influence crystallization including protein concentration, pH, temperature, age, volume of crystallization, inhibitors, metal ions, seeding, and precipitating agents on RuBisCO samples from Alcaligenes eutrophus which are not only freshly purified, but are also dissolved both individually and in combination from microcrystals and precipitated droplets of recycled RuBisCO. Single-, twin-, and/or microcrystals are dependent upon the concentration of RuBisCO by both RuBisCO samples. The morphology, either orthorhombic- or monoclinic-space group, depends upon pH. Furthermore, ammonium sulfate((NH4)2SO4) concentration at 20 °C (22% saturated) and/or at 4 °C (28% saturated) affected the crystallization of RuBisCO differently from one another. Finally, the age of RuBisCO also affected more uniformity and forming sharp edge during crystallization. Unexpected surprising monoclinic RuBisCO crystals were grown from dissolved microcrystals and precipitated droplets recycled RuBisCO samples. This quaternary RuBisCO single crystal, which contained Mg2+ and HCO3 for an activated ternary complex and is inhibited with a transition substrate analogue, CABP (2-carboxyarabinitol-1,5-bisphosphate)−, diffracts better than 2.2 Å. It is different from Hansen S. et al. reported RuBisCO crystals which were grown ab initio in absence of Mg2+, HCO3− and CABP, a structure which was determined at 2.7 Å resolution

A Short Review on Cryoprotectants for 3D Protein Structure Analysis

The three-dimensional structure of protein is determined by analyzing diffraction data collected using X-ray beams. However, X-ray beam can damage protein crystals during data collection, lowering the quality of the crystal data. A way to prevent such damage is by treating protein crystals with cryoprotectants. The cryoprotectant stabilizes the protein crystal and prevents lowering the quality of the diffraction data. Many kinds of cryoprotectants are commercially available, and various treatment methods have also been reported. However, incorrect selection or treatment of such cryoprotectants may lead to deterioration of crystal diffraction data when using X-ray beams

A Short Review on Cryoprotectants for 3D Protein Structure Analysis

The three-dimensional structure of protein is determined by analyzing diffraction data collected using X-ray beams. However, X-ray beam can damage protein crystals during data collection, lowering the quality of the crystal data. A way to prevent such damage is by treating protein crystals with cryoprotectants. The cryoprotectant stabilizes the protein crystal and prevents lowering the quality of the diffraction data. Many kinds of cryoprotectants are commercially available, and various treatment methods have also been reported. However, incorrect selection or treatment of such cryoprotectants may lead to deterioration of crystal diffraction data when using X-ray beams

Three-dimensional structure of the E. coli DMA-binding protein FIS

The factor for inversion stimulation, FIS, is involved in several cellular processes, including site-specific recombination and transcriptional activation. In the reactions catalysed by the DNA invertases Gin, Hin and Cin, FIS stimulates recombination by binding to an enhancer sequence. Within the enhancer, two FIS dimers (each 2 x 98 amino acids) bind to two 15-base-pair consensus sequences and induce bending of the DNA. Current models propose that the enhancer-FIS complex organizes a specific synapse, either through direct interactions with Gin, or by modelling the substrate into a configuration suitable for recombination. Using X-ray analysis at 2.0 A resolution, we now show that FIS is composed of four alpha helices tightly intertwined to form a globular dimer with two protruding helix-turn-helix motifs. The 24 N-terminal amino acids are so poorly defined in the electron density map as to make interpretation doubtful, indicating that they might act as 'feelers' suitable for DNA or protein (invertase) recognition. We infer from model building that DNA has to bend for tight binding to FIS

Location of the retinal docking sites.

<p>(a) The docking sites (I, II, III) are restricted to all residues within the radius of 10 Å (circles) from Met44 (I), Tyr268 (II) and Ala269 (III), respectively. Site I is close to opening A and the 90° kink of the channel, site II represents the retinal binding pocket, and site III is close to opening B. (b) Selected final conformations of retinal isomers resulting from the three docking procedures (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004382#pone-0004382-g005" target="_blank">Figures 5</a>–<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004382#pone-0004382-g006" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004382#pone-0004382-g007" target="_blank">7</a> for details). Blue, 11-<i>cis-</i>retinal docked to site I; green, all-<i>trans</i>-retinal docked to site II; and cyan, all-<i>trans</i>-retinal docked to site III. (c) View onto the ligand channel (electrostatic surface potentials as in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004382#pone-0004382-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1a</a>) with docked 11-<i>cis</i>- (blue) and all-<i>trans</i>-retinal (green, cyan). Parts of the receptor were omitted to visualize the two openings (A and B), the constrictions (C1–C4) and the neighbouring cavity (NC).</p

Constriction sites within the channel.

<p>Minimum inner width (d_min) measured at intervals of 0.6 Å progressing from opening A to opening B. The residues defining the constriction sites (C1–C4) are indicated, as well as the maximum and minimum extensions of the β-ionone moiety of the retinal.</p