5 research outputs found
Studies Exploring Non-Adherence in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients
Non-adherence to immunosuppressive medication is a major risk factor for poor clinical outcomes post-transplantation, including graft rejection and graft loss. However, it remains a common issue. Patients can experience side effects that are problematic and there may be a range of other life and psychosocial factors that interfere with treatment regimens. Withstanding such issues, adherence is vital to provide the kidney with the best chance of survival and function. In addition to patient outcomes, ill health resulting from non-adherence is costly to the NHS, since dialysis services are more expensive than those required to support transplantation. The programme of work within this thesis aims to further explore what is known about adherence in adult transplant recipients in order to drive advances in patient support. A series of studies were designed to assess different elements of adherence. This was achieved through: 1) a systematic review of existing research on adherence; 2) retrospectively considering the relationship between pre and post-transplant adherence in haemodialysis (HD) patients who later go onto receive a solid organ; 3) qualitative enquiry of the views and beliefs of clinical staff in relation to the importance of adherence for kidney transplant wait listing; 4) cross-sectional data collection with transplant recipients about treatment beliefs that may help understand behavioural patterns.
The systematic review provided a comprehensive evidence synthesis of literature exploring non-adherence to immunosuppressants among renal transplant recipients. A total of 60 studies were identified as relevant for inclusion. Studies varied in how they measured adherence, including self-report, electronic monitoring, pharmacy refill, blood levels and collateral report, with some studies combining more than one measure in an attempt to increase reliability. The overall non-adherence prevalence ranged across studies from 0.06% to 89.2%, dependent on how adherence was measured and operationalised. Self-report was the most commonly utilised measurement method to assess adherence behaviour. Meta-analysis of 38 studies revealed the pooled prevalence of self-reported non-adherence was 37.6%. The findings highlight a clear lack of consistency in how adherence is measured and defined, with greater guidelines needed across all measurement types.
A retrospective study examined the relationship between clinical measures of pre and post-transplant adherence in a group of patients who moved from HD to receive a transplant. Little previous research has explored if adherence behaviour transfers across modalities. Data was collected for 88 patients about adherence to HD regimens in the six months prior to transplantation, and for one-year post-transplantation following return transfer to the post-transplant clinic from the transplanting centre. Pre-transplant definitions of non-adherence included if patients: on average shortened their dialysis prescription by >10 minutes; shortened by >15 minutes; missed two or more HD sessions; and had mean serum phosphate levels >1.8mmol/l. Post-transplant definitions of non-adherence included: mean tacrolimus levels outside 5-10ng/mL; missed one or more post-transplant clinic appointments. Non-adherence ranged from 25%-42% pre-transplant and 15.9%-22.7% post-transplant dependent on how it was operationalised. There was little relationship between pre-transplant data and post-transplant adherence, with the exception of a significant relationship between pre-transplant phosphate and post-transplant clinic attendance. Patients who had missed one or more transplant clinic appointments had higher mean pre-transplant phosphate levels. Non-adherent patients with high phosphate levels pre-transplant and missed clinic appointments post-transplant were significantly younger.
Qualitative inquiry was used to gain in-depth understanding of how clinicians recognise non-adherence and whether or not pre-transplant adherence features in their decision making when determining if a patient is eligible for transplant listing. Thirty-six staff members who work closely with renal transplant recipients were recruited across two NHS trusts, and interviewed using a semi-structured interview. Staff members included nephrologists, transplant surgeons, registrars, transplant nurse specialists and pharmacists. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Five main themes were extracted on understanding of non-adherence: âBarriers to adherenceâ (including risk factors and control in ensuring adherence messages are conveyed), âStriving for normalityâ (in terms of how patients view transplantation as an opportunity for normality and to avoid dialysis) , âMutuality in maximising patient adherenceâ (through ensuring patients receive multi-disciplinary care, addressing barriers to adherence, and promoting patient autonomy through education and peer support), âComplexity in shining light on adherence in wait listingâ (highlighting subjectivity in the importance of adherence) and âPost-transplant normalizationâ (with patients less adherent due to perceptions of wellness and a lack of immediate consequences following missed medication doses). Findings demonstrate that clinicians recognise and understand the barriers that patients face with adherence, and work to try and make treatment management easier. Patient understanding and engagement was considered an effective way to promote adherence. Agreement on how adherence is viewed as part of eligibility for wait listing was lacking, with clinicians managing pre-transplant non-adherence in different ways.
A cross-sectional study further elucidated the relationship between self-reported adherence and markers of adherence obtained from clinical data. Additionally, the association between psychological factors, including illness perceptions and beliefs about medicines, with adherence was explored. Self-report measures used included the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5), Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (Brief IPQ) and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). Open-ended questions were also utilised to investigate how patients conceptualise their post-transplant treatment. Patients were recruited from one renal unit during the post-transplant weekly clinic, with 128 patients completing questionnaires. Findings showed no correlations between clinical data and MARS-5 adherence score. Certain illness perceptions were highlighted as independently predicting adherence behaviour. Perceptions of personal and treatment control were found to increase adherence. Conversely, perceptions of consequences and emotional representation were found to predict lower adherence. Patients reported higher scores on the necessity sub-scale than the concerns sub-scale of the BMQ, indicating they perceive the âbenefitsâ of immunosuppressant medication to outweigh the âcostsâ, however, the BMQ sub-scales did not significantly predict MARS-5 adherence. The qualitative comments via open-ended questions provided a mixed view towards experience of transplantation. Those reporting positive experiences had feelings of regained life, however, for some, life after transplant did not meet their expectations due to e.g. symptom burden or side effects. The findings point to areas for potential intervention by considering whether illness perceptions in particular should be assessed to signal patients who may struggle to engage with treatment regimens.
In conclusion, it is clear that non-adherence is a prevalent issue among the renal transplant population. This thesis has advanced clear areas of inconsistency in adherence research, alongside chartering new courses for further research and the development of clinical practice. Clearer definitions and measures of adherence are needed to provide greater reliability in reported non-adherence prevalence rates, and to allow for comparisons to be made across studies. A longitudinal follow-up is necessary to explore how and at which point adherence behaviour changes post-transplant. Agreement is needed across clinicians on how to consider the importance of adherence in transplant eligibility for listing. Finally, promoting patient autonomy to self-manage treatment regimens through education and communication is essential to addressing barriers to adherence
Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety in children and young people on the autism spectrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.Abstract: Background: Anxiety is common in youth on the autism spectrum and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been adapted to address associated symptoms. The aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the efficacy of CBT for reducing anxiety in autistic youth. Method: Searches of PubMed and Scopus databases were undertaken from January 1990 until December 2020. Studies were included if they consisted of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using CBT to reduce anxiety in autistic youth. Separate random effects meta-analyses assessed anxiety ratings according to informant (clinician; parent; child), both at end-of-trial and at follow-up. Results: A total of 19 RCTs met our inclusion criteria (833 participants: CBT N = 487; controls N = 346). Random effects meta-analyses revealed a large effect size for clinician rated symptoms (g = 0.88, 95% CI 0.55, 1.12, k = 11), while those for both parent (g = 0.40, 95% CI 0.24, 0.56; k = 18) and child-reported anxiety (g = 0.25, 95% CI 0.06, 0.43; k = 13) were smaller, but significant. These benefits were not however maintained at follow-up. Moderator analyses showed that CBT was more efficacious for younger children (for clinician and parent ratings) and when delivered as individual therapy (for clinician ratings). Using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, we found concerns about reporting bias across most trials. Conclusions: The efficacy of CBT for anxiety in autistic youth was supported in the immediate intervention period. However, substantial inconsistency emerged in the magnitude of benefit depending upon who was rating symptoms (clinician, parent or child). Follow-up analyses failed to reveal sustained benefits, though few studies have included this data. It will be important for future trials to address robustness of treatment gains overtime and to further explore inconsistency in efficacy by informant. We also recommend pre-registration of methods by trialists to address concerns with reporting bias.Peer reviewe
Non-adherence to immunosuppressants following renal transplantation: a protocol for a systematic review
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Abstract Introduction Adherence to immunosuppressant medication is essential for renal transplant recipients. This review aims to summarise what is known about non-adherence, with a view to providing comprehensive evidence to inform strategies aimed at advancing adherent behaviour. Methods and analysis A systematic review of quantitative studies that report adherence to immunosuppressants in adult (over 18 years) renal transplant recipients. The review will follow the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines; study quality will be assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. Systematic searches will be completed across relevant databases. Two reviewers will independently extract data using a predefined data extraction form. We will summarise the operationalisation of adherence across studies and use narrative synthesis to identify factors associated with non-adherence. A meta-analysis will be conducted if there is sufficient homogeneity, and available data, across studies to estimate the prevalence of non-adherence in renal transplant recipients. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I2 test. Survival analysis will be conducted to estimate hazard ratios to explore the impact of non-adherence on graft survival, graft failure and patient survival. Ethics and dissemination Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at conferences for professionals and researchers. Review outcomes will help support clinical practice by highlighting the extent of non-adherence among adults, and in doing so, signpost the need for suitable intervention. Trial registration number PROSPERO registration number (CRD42016038751).Peer reviewedFinal Published versio
Illness perceptions of Turkish Cypriot patients receiving haemodialysis: A qualitative study
This is a peer reviewed version of the following article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12351. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.Background: Illness perceptions refer to cognitive appraisals that help patients understand and make sense of their condition. Although their importance in health behaviour and outcomes has been evidenced, less is known about cultural influences on mental representations of kidney failure amongst patients receiving haemodialysis in different settings. Objective: To explore the illness perceptions of Turkish patients receiving haemodialysis in North Cyprus (Turkish Cypriots). Design: A qualitative study involving individual semistructured interviews. Participants: Fourteen patients receiving haemodialysis, recruited from three state hospitals in North Cyprus. Approach: All interviews were conducted in Turkish, audioârecorded, and transcribed verbatim. They were analysed inductively in the original language using reflexive thematic analysis. Once the analysis was completed, it was translated into English. Quality assurance was integral to the research process to retain semantic equivalence. Findings: Three themes were developed. âIllness appraisalâ highlighted a lack of factual knowledge about kidney failure and how this is related to attempts at senseâmaking, whilst retaining hope for the future. âLifeâchanging effectsâ centred around the negative consequences of haemodialysis across multiple domains (e.g., emotional and physical).âActive coping strategiesâ focused on mechanisms that patients adopt to manage the burden of haemodialysis, particularly approaches that are culturally rooted.Peer reviewe
Committed to work but vulnerable:Self-perceptions and mental health in NEET 18-year olds from a contemporary British cohort
BackgroundLabour market disengagement among youths has lasting negative economic and social consequences, yet is poorly understood. We compared four types of work-related self-perceptions, as well as vulnerability to mental health and substance abuse problems, among youths not in education, employment or training (NEET) and among their peers.MethodsParticipants were from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) longitudinal study, a nationally representative UK cohort of 2,232 twins born in 1994-1995. We measured commitment to work, job-search effort, professional/technical skills, 'soft' skills (e.g. teamwork, decision-making, communication), optimism about getting ahead, and mental health and substance use disorders at age 18. We also examined childhood mental health.ResultsAt age 18, 11.6% of participants were NEET. NEET participants reported themselves as committed to work and searching for jobs with greater diligence than their non-NEET peers. However, they reported fewer 'soft' skills (B = -0.98, p < .001) and felt less optimistic about their likelihood of getting ahead in life (B = -2.41, p < .001). NEET youths also had higher rates of concurrent mental health and substance abuse problems, but these did not explain the relationship with work-related self-perceptions. Nearly 60% of NEET (vs. 35% of non-NEET) youths had already experienced â„1 mental health problem in childhood/adolescence. Associations of NEET status with concurrent mental health problems were independent of pre-existing mental health vulnerability.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that while NEET is clearly an economic and mental health issue, it does not appear to be a motivation issue. Alongside skills, work-related self-perceptions and mental health problems may be targets for intervention and service provision among this high-risk population