26 research outputs found
Oregon Department of Forestry's Landscape Resiliency Program : assessing the project selection process for the 2021-2023 biennium
35 pagesThe Oregon Department of Forestry’s (ODF) Landscape
Resiliency Program (LRP) is a grant program to support cross-boundary restoration of landscape
resiliency and fuels reduction within Oregon. In
fall 2021, ODF requested the Ecosystem Workforce Program
(EWP) at the University of Oregon (UO) devise
and carry out a plan for monitoring investments and
outcomes of the LRP. LRP monitoring focuses on three stages–
Project Selection, Implementation, and Outcomes. The
purpose of this working paper is to report the results
of the Project Selection monitoring phase. This report
presents 1) stakeholders’ experiences with the LRP
program development, application process, and project
selection, 2) characterization of grantee organizations,
and 3) characterization of project geographies.Funding for this study was provided by the Oregon Department of Forestry to the University of Oregon’s Ecosystem
Workforce Program (Agreement number M0177, Task order #5)
Oregon Wildfire Smoke Communications and Impacts: An Evaluation of the 2020 Wildfire Season
50 pagesOregon Health Authority and the University of Oregon partnered to conduct a
survey-based evaluation of wildfire smoke communications and impacts experienced
by Oregon residents during the 2020 wildfire season. The purpose of this
survey was to (1) understand how Oregonians respond to wildfire smoke and
(2) provide an open-source evaluation tool and data to support wildfire smoke
communication practitioners in Oregon.
This evaluation is intended to guide improvement of public risk communication,
programs, and recommendations. This document is intended to inform practitioners
and staff at public agencies (public health, emergency management,
natural resource management), academics, and community members about key
findings and recommendations from the survey related to:
1. patterns and correlations surrounding information sources and needs.
2. patterns around health behaviors related to preventing smoke exposure.
3. information relevant for raising awareness and preparedness of specific
risk groups.
4. potential areas and questions for future research
Oakridge-Westfir Smoke and Air Quality: Community Survey
13 page report; 28 page appendix I; 19 page appendix II; 1 spreadsheetThis report summarizes the results of a 2024 Oakridge Air community survey on air quality and smoke from wildfire and woodstoves. This community survey was informed by interviews conducted with community leaders to identify key information needs and actions related to air quality and smoke locally. Oakridge, in Lane County, Oregon, has historically been ranked among the top 20 communities in the United States with the worst air quality due to high concentrations of particulate matter (PM2.5) from home wood heating (woodstove) and wildfire smoke. Supplemental materials that accompany this report include two appendices: Appendix I: Oakridge Smoke & Air Quality Survey is the survey instrument, Consent Form, Gift Card form, and Oakridge Air Survey Hand-Out. Appendix II: Detailed Survey Methods and Results reports all response categories for all survey questions, in the order the survey was designed. The full de-identified survey results are also included.This research was funded through the Lane Regional Air Protection Agency as part of the Environmental Protection Agency 2021 Targeted Airshed Program (TAG2), under intergovernmental agreement number LRAPA 22-05-01 TAG
ODF Landscape Resilience Program monitoring plan
16 pagesThe Oregon Department of Forestry’s (ODF)
Landscape Resiliency Program (LRP) is a
grant program established by Senate Bill
762 (SB762), Section 18-20 (2021) to support crossboundary
forest restoration and resiliency within
Oregon. In early 2022, the grant program awarded
funding in the amount of $20 million to nine
landscape-scale projects to reduce wildfire risk on
public and private forestlands and rangelands and
around homes and critical infrastructure through
the restoration of forest resiliency and hazardous
fuels reduction for the 2021-2023 biennium.
ODF requested the Ecosystem Workforce Program
(EWP) at the University of Oregon (UO) to devise a
plan for monitoring investments and outcomes of
the LRP. This draft document outlines a monitoring
plan that proposes questions, indicators, methods,
deliverables, and timelines for the LRP monitoring.This work was funded via an agreement with the Oregon Department of Forestry (Agreement number
M0177, Task order 4)
Social-ecological enabling conditions for payments for ecosystem services
The concept of “enabling conditions” centers on conditions that facilitate approaches to addressing social and ecological challenges. Although multiple fields have independently addressed the concept of enabling conditions, the literature lacks a shared understanding or integration of concepts. We propose a more synthesized understanding of enabling conditions beyond disciplinary boundaries by focusing on the enabling conditions that influence the implementation of a range of environmental policies termed payments for ecosystem services (PES). Through an analysis of key literature from different disciplinary perspectives, we examined how researchers and practitioners refer to and identify enabling conditions within the context of PES. Through our synthesis, we identified 24 distinct enabling conditions organized within 4 broad themes: biophysical, economic, governance, and social-cultural conditions. We found that the literature coalesces around certain enabling conditions, such as strong ecosystem science and existing institutions, regardless of disciplinary background or journal audience. We also observed key differences in how authors perceive the direction of influence for property type, program objectives, and number of actors. Additionally, we noted an emphasis on the importance of the contextual nature of many enabling conditions that may cause certain conditions to have a disproportionate impact on successful implementation in some circumstances. Unraveling the relative importance of specific enabling conditions in diverse contexts remains a research frontier. Ultimately, no single disciplinary perspective is likely to provide all necessary insights for PES creation, and given the intertwined nature of enabling conditions, practitioners need to consider insights from multiple dimensions. Our work suggests opportunities to better connect diverse conversations through integration of concepts, a common vocabulary, and a synthetic framework
Wildfire smoke and athletic events : understanding public concerns, experiences, and preparedness
21 pagesThe increasingly longer
and more severe wildfire smoke events in the Pacific
Northwest are likely to occur during outdoor athletic
events. We investigated wildfire smoke concerns,
air quality communication preferences, and protective
action behaviors among sporting event attendees
through a survey created by our interdisciplinary research
team from the UO. This report presents survey
results and implications for improving communication
and protocol for air quality and smoke during
future outdoor athletic events.Funding for this study was provided by the University of Oregon
Oregon Department of Forestry's Landscape Resiliency Program : assessing implementation and outcomes for the 2021-2023 biennium
41 pagesThe Oregon Department of Forestry’s (ODF) Landscape
Resiliency Program (LRP) is a grant program to support cross-boundary restoration
of landscape resiliency and fuels reduction within
Oregon. In fall 2021, ODF requested the Ecosystem
Workforce Program (EWP) at the University of Oregon
(UO) to devise and carry out a plan for monitoring
investments and outcomes of the LRP. The LRP monitoring
plan focused on three stages: Project Selection,
Implementation, and Outcomes. The purpose of this
working paper is to report the results of the Implementation
and Outcomes monitoring phases. This report presents 1) an overview
of selected projects, 2) project participants' experiences
with project implementation successes, challenges,
and lessons learned, 3) on-the-ground accomplishments
of LRP projects, and 4) an assessment of
the economic aspects of LRP.Funding for this study was provided by the Oregon Department of Forestry to the University of Oregon’s Ecosystem
Workforce Program (Agreement number M0177, Task order #5)
Monitoring investments in Oregon's Federal Forest Restoration Program, 2019-2021 biennium
36 pagesThe Federal Forest Restoration Program (FFR Program)
is a partnership between the state of Oregon,
federal forest managers, and public lands stakeholders
to increase forest restoration and economic
opportunity on federal forest lands across Oregon.
The purpose of this working paper is to provide an
update for the investments made by the FFR Program
for the 2019–2021 state funding biennium as
well as an assessment of the tangible and intangible
impacts of those investments over the same period.
Previous findings for Oregon state fiscal years
(FY) 2014–2019, including a cumulative report, are
reported elsewhere. This report presents: 1) FFR
Program expenditures, 2) economic impacts of FFR
Program expenditures, 3) on-the-ground accomplishments
of FFR Program expenditures, and 4)
stakeholders’ perspectives about FFR Program successes
and current and future challenges.Funding for this study was provided by the Oregon Department of Forestry to the University of Oregon (M0177, Task order #2), Oregon State University (Task order #191-677-3), and the USDA Forest Service (#20-CO-11261979-021)
Monitoring investments in Oregon's Federal Forest Restoration Program, 2021-2023 biennium
35 pagesThe Federal Forest Restoration (FFR) Program is a joint
effort among the Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF),
federal forest managers, and public lands stakeholders to
increase the pace, scale, and quality of federal forest restoration
across Oregon. The program supports management
for forest resilience on federal lands as well as economic
opportunities for surrounding communities. This working
paper provides an update on FFR Program investments and
outcomes for the 2021-2023 biennium. Reports from the
previous biennium (2019-2021) can be found elsewhere.
Here we report: 1) FFR Program expenditures, 2) economic
activity from timber sales and the FFR grant investments,
3) on-the-ground accomplishments of the FFR Program,
and 4) stakeholders’ perspectives on the FFR Program’s
successes and challenges.Funding for this study was provided by the Oregon Department of Forestry to the University of Oregon’s Ecosystem
Workforce Program (Agreement number M0177, Task order #5)
Private contracting on national forest lands : preseason contracting and fire response
22 pagesThe U.S. Forest Service is facing unprecedented challenges in wildfire suppression, and increasingly depends on private wildfire suppression to bolster capacity for direct attack resources, such as aerial resources, firefighter hand crews and other equipment. The processes and procedures employed for contracting such resources are complex and can be difficult to follow and understand. The purpose of this paper is to provide a clear and step-wise presentation of the private contracting system for wildfire suppression on federal lands, highlighting the key actors, actions, policies and procedures used throughout.This study was made possible by funding from the Joint Fire Sciences Program