33 research outputs found
Large Scale Structure of the Universe
Galaxies are not uniformly distributed in space. On large scales the Universe
displays coherent structure, with galaxies residing in groups and clusters on
scales of ~1-3 Mpc/h, which lie at the intersections of long filaments of
galaxies that are >10 Mpc/h in length. Vast regions of relatively empty space,
known as voids, contain very few galaxies and span the volume in between these
structures. This observed large scale structure depends both on cosmological
parameters and on the formation and evolution of galaxies. Using the two-point
correlation function, one can trace the dependence of large scale structure on
galaxy properties such as luminosity, color, stellar mass, and track its
evolution with redshift. Comparison of the observed galaxy clustering
signatures with dark matter simulations allows one to model and understand the
clustering of galaxies and their formation and evolution within their parent
dark matter halos. Clustering measurements can determine the parent dark matter
halo mass of a given galaxy population, connect observed galaxy populations at
different epochs, and constrain cosmological parameters and galaxy evolution
models. This chapter describes the methods used to measure the two-point
correlation function in both redshift and real space, presents the current
results of how the clustering amplitude depends on various galaxy properties,
and discusses quantitative measurements of the structures of voids and
filaments. The interpretation of these results with current theoretical models
is also presented.Comment: Invited contribution to be published in Vol. 8 of book "Planets,
Stars, and Stellar Systems", Springer, series editor T. D. Oswalt, volume
editor W. C. Keel, v2 includes additional references, updated to match
published versio
Measuring our universe from galaxy redshift surveys
Galaxy redshift surveys have achieved significant progress over the last
couple of decades. Those surveys tell us in the most straightforward way what
our local universe looks like. While the galaxy distribution traces the bright
side of the universe, detailed quantitative analyses of the data have even
revealed the dark side of the universe dominated by non-baryonic dark matter as
well as more mysterious dark energy (or Einstein's cosmological constant). We
describe several methodologies of using galaxy redshift surveys as cosmological
probes, and then summarize the recent results from the existing surveys.
Finally we present our views on the future of redshift surveys in the era of
Precision Cosmology.Comment: 82 pages, 31 figures, invited review article published in Living
Reviews in Relativity, http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2004-
The expansion field: The value of H_0
Any calibration of the present value of the Hubble constant requires
recession velocities and distances of galaxies. While the conversion of
observed velocities into true recession velocities has only a small effect on
the result, the derivation of unbiased distances which rest on a solid zero
point and cover a useful range of about 4-30 Mpc is crucial. A list of 279 such
galaxy distances within v<2000 km/s is given which are derived from the tip of
the red-giant branch (TRGB), from Cepheids, and from supernovae of type Ia (SNe
Ia). Their random errors are not more than 0.15 mag as shown by
intercomparison. They trace a linear expansion field within narrow margins from
v=250 to at least 2000 km/s. Additional 62 distant SNe Ia confirm the linearity
to at least 20,000 km/s. The dispersion about the Hubble line is dominated by
random peculiar velocities, amounting locally to <100 km/s but increasing
outwards. Due to the linearity of the expansion field the Hubble constant H_0
can be found at any distance >4.5 Mpc. RR Lyr star-calibrated TRGB distances of
78 galaxies above this limit give H_0=63.0+/-1.6 at an effective distance of 6
Mpc. They compensate the effect of peculiar motions by their large number.
Support for this result comes from 28 independently calibrated Cepheids that
give H_0=63.4+/-1.7 at 15 Mpc. This agrees also with the large-scale value of
H_0=61.2+/-0.5 from the distant, Cepheid-calibrated SNe Ia. A mean value of
H_0=62.3+/-1.3 is adopted. Because the value depends on two independent zero
points of the distance scale its systematic error is estimated to be 6%.
Typical errors of H_0 come from the use of a universal, yet unjustified P-L
relation of Cepheids, the neglect of selection bias in magnitude-limited
samples, or they are inherent to the adopted models.Comment: 44 pages, 4 figures, 6 tables, accepted for publication in the
Astronony and Astrophysics Review 15
Shedding Light on the Galaxy Luminosity Function
From as early as the 1930s, astronomers have tried to quantify the
statistical nature of the evolution and large-scale structure of galaxies by
studying their luminosity distribution as a function of redshift - known as the
galaxy luminosity function (LF). Accurately constructing the LF remains a
popular and yet tricky pursuit in modern observational cosmology where the
presence of observational selection effects due to e.g. detection thresholds in
apparent magnitude, colour, surface brightness or some combination thereof can
render any given galaxy survey incomplete and thus introduce bias into the LF.
Over the last seventy years there have been numerous sophisticated
statistical approaches devised to tackle these issues; all have advantages --
but not one is perfect. This review takes a broad historical look at the key
statistical tools that have been developed over this period, discussing their
relative merits and highlighting any significant extensions and modifications.
In addition, the more generalised methods that have emerged within the last few
years are examined. These methods propose a more rigorous statistical framework
within which to determine the LF compared to some of the more traditional
methods. I also look at how photometric redshift estimations are being
incorporated into the LF methodology as well as considering the construction of
bivariate LFs. Finally, I review the ongoing development of completeness
estimators which test some of the fundamental assumptions going into LF
estimators and can be powerful probes of any residual systematic effects
inherent magnitude-redshift data.Comment: 95 pages, 23 figures, 3 tables. Now published in The Astronomy &
Astrophysics Review. This version: bring in line with A&AR format
requirements, also minor typo corrections made, additional citations and
higher rez images adde